Current filters:  
United States
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP
The most significant for most trademark practitioners are the new email and specimen requirements.
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Despite the existence of a copyright registration, the SDNY recently dismissed a copyright infringement claim for the control panel of a portable clothes dryer system, finding that the registered...
Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP
To ease the burden on our foreign-domiciled clients, Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie will waive its professional fees associated with recording itself as local U.S. counsel.
Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP
Trade dress rights provide protection for product appearance and configuration when those attributes have come to identify the source of the product.
Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP
The Examination Guide is unclear as to when existing applications and registrations must be updated with this new information.
Squire Patton Boggs LLP
Highlighting the patent law developments you should know in biotech, biologics and pharmaceutical cases, legislation and federal agency actions in January 2020.
Smith Gambrell & Russell LLP
Patagonia Inc., an outdoor apparel company known for its commitment to conservation efforts, filed suit on Monday against a Colorado-based retailer for trademark and copyright infringement
Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C.
In Cheetah Omni LLC v. AT&T Services, Inc., [2019-1264] (February 6, 2020) the Federal Circuit affirmed the dismissal of claims for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,522,836.
Jones Day
The institution rate for post-grant challenges in current FY 2020 (Oct. 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019) stands at 55% compared to 63% in the previous fiscal year.
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
A TTAB Administrative Trademark Judge once said to me that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d)...
Hogan Lovells
On February 7, 2020, and effective February 15, 2020, the USPTO issued a new examination guideline titled, Mandatory Electronic Filing and Specimen Requirements (Guide 1-20)...
DLA Piper
Under 35 U.S.C. § 315(e), a petitioner, real party in interest, or privy of the petitioner in an IPR that results in a final written decision may not assert in a district court litigation that a claim
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
This article breaks down the arguments likely to be heard by the Supreme Court.
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Ever wonder if you can get a refund after you pay an oral hearing fee? As provided under 37 CFR § 1.26(a), a change of purpose after the payment of a fee...
Pryor Cashman LLP
On Friday, the United States Trademark Office ("USPTO") announced changes to the trademark rules of practice that will go into effect on February 15th, 2020.
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
The USPTO refused registration of the proposed mark J HUTTON for "Eyewear, eyewear frames and sunglasses," finding the mark to be primarily merely a surname under Section 2(e)(4).
Ropes & Gray LLP
The Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) does not accept trial grounds under 35 U.S.C § 112 in Inter Partes Review.
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz
Late last week, the Trademark Office made waves when it published Examination Guide 1-20, which contains the latest update on the procedures for filing and examining trademark applications.
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz
Benjamin's video begins with abbreviated scenes of Hughes's pre-election optimism and post-election disappointment.
Ward and Smith, P.A.
Who knows, but on January 15, 2020, the United States ("U.S.") and China signed Phase One of the Economic and Trade Agreement between the U.S. and China (the "Agreement").
FREE News Alerts
Sign Up for our free News Alerts - All the latest articles on your chosen topics condensed into a free bi-weekly email.
Popular Contributors
Upcoming Events
Conference New York United States
Font Size:
Mondaq Social Media