Current filters:  
USA
IP
United States
Stites & Harbison PLLC
Feb 14, 2020: Edit: Today the US PTO surprised everyone with a lovely Valentine. It revised the examination guide to note that applicants represented by counsel may provide
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
It has been said that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) appeal 95% of the time just by looking at the marks and the involved goods or services!
Global Advertising Lawyers Alliance (GALA)
When you retweet - using functionality built into Twitter's platform that is fundamental to how Twitter works - can you be held responsible for copyright infringement...
Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer Baratz
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that a binding settlement agreement generally moots a lower court action even where the agreement requires future performance.
Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer Baratz
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that the patent marking statute, 35 U.S.C. § 287, limits damages even after a patentee or licensee ceases sales of unmarked products, and that willful infringement ...
Squire Patton Boggs LLP
After deliberating less than three hours, a jury in the Northern District of Illinois recently awarded Motorola Solutions over $700 million in damages for ...
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
A federal judge in the Northern District of California recently rejected an argument that would have expanded inter partes review (IPR)
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
In a three-page Order, the Board ruled that a party domiciled in Canada, despite the appearance of an authorized Canadian trademark attorney/agent on its behalf,...
Klein Moynihan Turco LLP
A trademark is a word, phrase, symbol, or design, or combination thereof, that identifies and distinguishes the source of goods/services.
Morrison & Foerster LLP
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) just issued new rules that directly affect trademark owners.
Haug Partners
On February 15, 2020, a rule change went into effect requiring trademark Applicants and Registrants to list a working email address at the USPTO.
Squire Patton Boggs LLP
In a recent district court decision, Judge Stark (D. Del.) further clarified the scope of the rights derived from a Patent Term Extension (PTE) during the extension period.
Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C.
In Apple Inc. v. Andrea Electronics Corp., [2018-2382, 2018-2383] (February 7, 2020), the Federal Circuit vacated the Board's decision in a first IPR on U.S. Patent No. 6,363,345
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz
In September 2018, Kiva Health Brands LLC ("KHB"), which supplies natural foods under the trademark KIVA, sued Kiva Brands Inc.
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz
Last week, I discussed the USPTO's new rules, including the requirement that applicants supply an email address to which they have direct access (in addition to any email address provided by the...
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz
When Colors in Optics, Ltd. sought registration of J HUTTON for its "eyewear, eyewear frames, and sunglasses," it likely did not anticipate that...
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz
In February 2018, we wrote a detailed summary of the procedural background of the case and Judge Block's decision (available here)...
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz
When you retweet - using functionality built into Twitter's platform that is fundamental to how Twitter works - can you be held responsible for ...
Jones Day
In a recent decision, the PTAB admitted that it erred in its prior determination of unpatentability, and authorized supplemental briefing on the patentability of substitute claims.
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
[This guest post was authored by John L. Strand, Shareholder in the Trademark and Litigation Groups at Wolf Greenfield].
FREE News Alerts
Sign Up for our free News Alerts - All the latest articles on your chosen topics condensed into a free bi-weekly email.
Popular Contributors
Upcoming Events
FEB28
Conference New York United States
Tools
Font Size:
Translation
Mondaq Social Media