United States:
Where Party Joined Pending IPRs, Delaware Takes Broad View Of § 315 Estoppel, PTAB Litigation Blog
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
In Parallel Networks Licensing, LLC v. International Business
Machines Corporation, No. 1:13-cv-02072, Dkt. No. 366 (D. Del. Feb.
22, 2017) (Slip Op.), the court held IBM was estopped from
asserting obviousness under §103 based on prior art
combinations of which IBM was aware before its filed its IPR
petitions. Id. at 24-26.
Read the full article at ptablitigationblog.com.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Intellectual Property from United States
Are Your NDAs Up To Date?
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
Nondisclosure agreements (NDAs) can be used to protect companies' confi dential and trade secret information. But you should resist the urge to have a vendor...
Legal Implications Of New York Times vs. OpenAI
BoyarMiller
The New York Times recently filed a landmark lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft, accusing them of copyright infringement in the training of the chatbot ChatGPT which launched just over a year ago.
