New Zealand: Impact of the TPPA on New Zealand's Overseas Investment Regime

Last Updated: 26 November 2015
Article by Oliver Roberts

On 5 October 2015, Trade Ministers of 12 Pacific-rim countries negotiating the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA) announced the formal conclusion of negotiations. The TPPA is a free trade agreement between New Zealand, Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Peru, Singapore, the United States and Viet Nam (TPP Countries). The TPPA is expected to come into force within two years, once the TPP Countries have completed their domestic legislative processes.1

The full text of the TPPA was made available to the public on 5 November 20152 and the New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFAT) has published New Zealand-specific factsheets on the content of the TPPA.3 Our comments below are based on a review of the MFAT factsheets and the full text of the Investment chapter (Chapter 9) of the TPPA.

One of the aims of the TPPA is to promote increased investment by investors from TPP Countries in other TPP Countries, while acknowledging existing investment screening regimes already in place.

Overseas investment into New Zealand is subject to the Overseas Investment Act 2005 (Act) and the Overseas Investment Regulations 2005 (Regulations). The Act acknowledges that it is a privilege for overseas persons to own or control sensitive New Zealand assets, by requiring overseas investments in those assets to meet criteria for consent before being made, and by imposing conditions on those overseas investments. The Act and the Regulations require an overseas investor to apply to the Overseas Investment Office (OIO) for consent before investing in "significant business assets" or "sensitive" New Zealand land.

This article examines the extent to which the TPPA will affect New Zealand's overseas investment regime.

Overseas Investment in Sensitive Business Assets – Current Position

Investments in "significant business assets" include the acquisition of business assets with a value of more than $100 million, or interests of at least 25% in companies that have assets valued at more than $100 million. Australian investors benefit from a higher asset threshold for investments in "significant business assets."4

Overseas investments in significant business assets need to be approved by the OIO[5], but the criteria that must be satisfied are less onerous than those for investments in sensitive land. To obtain OIO approval the overseas person must satisfy the OIO that they:

  • Have business experience and acumen relevant to the investment;
  • Have demonstrated financial commitment to the investment;
  • Are of good character; and
  • Are not an individual referred to in sections 15 or 16 of the Immigration Act 2009 (which list certain persons not eligible for visas or entry permission).

Overseas Investment in Sensitive Land – Current Position

Investments in "sensitive" New Zealand land include all purchases of non-urban land of more than 5 hectares, as well as smaller land purchases where the land has other sensitive features, such as including or adjoining reserves, conservation land, historic places, lakes or the foreshore. An overseas person wishing to invest in sensitive land must meet the good character and business experience criteria that apply to investments in significant business assets (as listed above). In addition, they must satisfy the OIO that either:

  • They intend to reside in New Zealand indefinitely; or
  • The overseas investment will, or is likely to, benefit New Zealand and where the land is non-urban land exceeding 5 hectares, that benefit will or is likely to be, substantial and identifiable.

Effect of the TPPA on the Overseas Investment Regime

Preferential Screening Threshold for Investments in Significant Business Assets

The most immediate change to the overseas investment regime resulting from the TPPA is that the TPP Countries have agreed to offer preferential screening thresholds for all other TPP Countries. To give effect to this, the New Zealand Government has agreed that the threshold for OIO approval for investments in "significant business assets" will increase to $200 million for TPP Countries. This will mean that investments of less than $200 million will not be subject to OIO approval and the "good character" and "business experience" investor tests.

It is important to note that if the assets being acquired by an overseas person as part of a business acquisition include any sensitive New Zealand land, the investment will still require OIO consent even if it falls within the $200 million dollar threshold. The $200 million threshold will only exclude investments in New Zealand business assets where no sensitive land is being acquired as part of the investment. Investments in sensitive New Zealand land will continue to be subject to approval by the OIO regardless of their dollar value.

The MFAT resources note that some provisions in the Investment chapter of the TPPA, including the higher $200 million screening threshold, will flow through to New Zealand's free trade agreements with China, Chinese Taipei and Korea, in which there are "most favoured nation" provisions.[6]

National Treatment Subject to Continued Right to Screen Investments in New Zealand

The TPPA contains general provisions that effectively mean New Zealand cannot treat investors from TPP Countries any differently than it treats New Zealand investors.

However, New Zealand will retain the right to screen all foreign investments that are currently subject to the Act and Regulations (subject only to the increased threshold for investments in significant business assets) and purchases of sensitive land will still have to meet a "benefit to New Zealand" test. New Zealand is not obliged to relax the criteria in the Act or Regulations to give preferential treatment to the TPP Countries. This is because the general obligations in Chapter 9 are subject to existing "non-conforming" measures that have been recognised and accepted by the TPP Countries. This is achieved using a "negative list" approach - each TPP Country's "negative list" sets out the existing measures that the TPP Country is permitted to maintain, despite being contrary to the general nature of the Investment provisions of the TPPA.

The "negative list" consists of two parts: Annex I and Annex II. Annex I sets out existing measures that can be maintained provided they are not made more restrictive in the future. Annex II sets out existing measures that can be maintained but also freely amended, notwithstanding that the amendments may increase the non-conformance with the provisions of the TPPA.

Annex I of New Zealand's negative list refers to the need for approval for overseas investments in significant business assets (with reference to the new $200 million threshold for TPP Countries) and sensitive land. Under Annex II of its negative list New Zealand reserves the right to adopt or maintain any measure that sets out the approval criteria to be applied to the categories of investments that require approval under its overseas investment regime. The effect of this is:

  • New Zealand cannot change (i.e. increase) the types of overseas investments that require approval under the overseas investment regime;
  • New Zealand can change the criteria to be applied to overseas investments that require approval.

The TPP Countries have accepted that New Zealand is entitled to continue to screen foreign investments in significant business assets and sensitive land through the OIO and require investments in sensitive land to meet a "benefit to New Zealand" test.

The "criteria" for the approval of sensitive land acquisitions include satisfaction of the "good character" and "business acumen" tests, and satisfying the OIO that the investment will or is likely to benefit New Zealand (in a substantial and identifiable way where the land being purchased is non-urban land over 5 hectares). The Act and Regulations set out factors for assessing whether the "benefit to New Zealand" test is satisfied. While these factors are not expressly referred to in Annex I or Annex II, we suggest that as New Zealand has full discretion over the approval criteria, the factors that assist in applying those criteria are likely to also be considered to be freely changeable.

However, in describing the existing regimes, Annex I and Annex II each simply refer to overseas investments in "sensitive land". What is not clear is whether New Zealand has the right under the TPPA to amend the description of "sensitive land" under the Act, for example by expanding the definition to cover a wider range of land acquisitions, or reducing land area thresholds. Arguably, because the "nature" of investments subject to the regime is referred to in Annex I, while Annex II refers to the approval criteria, an attempt to amend the "sensitive land" definition could be met with a challenge from one of the TPP Countries.

Applying the Benefit to New Zealand test – New Zealand's International Obligations

The Act and Regulations contain factors that must be considered by the OIO in assessing whether an overseas investment in sensitive New Zealand land will or is likely to benefit New Zealand. Regulation 28(c) requires consideration of whether refusing the application for consent will, or is likely to (i) adversely affect New Zealand's image overseas or its trade or international obligations, or (ii) result in New Zealand breaching any of its international obligations.

In past applications, the OIO has often commented on this factor with a statement along the following lines:

"The OIO considers that a refusal would not likely result in New Zealand breaching any of its international obligations. The OIO further considers that any decline would be on the basis that Ministers were not satisfied that the relevant criteria for consent were met. The OIO would think it unlikely that a well reasoned decision to decline will, or is likely to, adversely affect New Zealand's image overseas or its trade or international relations."

The issue with this approach is that it seems to place greater weight on the other factors in the Act and Regulations, by stating that a well reasoned decision (effectively based on those other factors) would mean Regulation 28(c) was not met. However, Regulation 28(c) is one of those factors that should be considered in reaching the decision.

The OIO's approach as outlined above does not consider Regulation 28(c) as a stand-alone factor, effectively making the factor in Regulation 28(c) redundant and potentially making decisions open to a legal challenge as to the weight given to that factor. However, given the express recognition of New Zealand's existing overseas investment regime in the TPPA, we do not consider that proper application and consideration of this factor would likely result in a different outcome in any application made by a TPP Country.

Investor State Dispute Settlement Mechanism

The TPPA Investment chapter contains an "investor state dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanism" that allows foreign investors to pursue remedies directly against a TPP Country in relation to breaches of the TPPA investment provisions. New Zealand has secured a country-specific exception which means government decisions under the Act to grant or decline consent for foreign investment are not subject to ISDS.


1 In New Zealand, this includes a Parliamentary treaty examination process, where the TPPA and a National Interest Analysis is presented to Parliament for examination by the Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Select Committee. The public will be invited to make submissions as part of the consultation process. Legislative changes required to implement the TPPA will then go through normal Parliamentary procedures, including select committees.



4 The Overseas Investment (Australia) Amendment Regulations 2013 increased the threshold for Australian non-Government investments to $477 million.

5 Under powers delegated by the responsible Ministers, the OIO has the power to make final decisions on some OIO applications. For non-delegated applications, the OIO makes a recommendation to the responsible Ministers, who are responsible for the final decision. References in this article to OIO approval include approval by the Ministers where applicable.

6 "Most Favoured Nation" provisions require that any better treatment relating to investment that New Zealand extends to other countries must also be extended to these FTA partners.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions