United States: Adobe Data Breach Ruling Gives New Hope To Plaintiffs

Data breach class actions have multiplied rapidly in the wake of several sophisticated, large-scale attacks on corporate computer systems, and a recent decision in California federal court may have added some new fuel to the fire. In a sharp departure from a string of recent decisions across the country, Judge Lucy H. Koh of the Northern District of California concluded that plaintiffs suing Adobe Systems Inc. had standing to bring claims against Adobe arising from a massive breach in 2013 even though they could not allege actual misuse of their stolen personal information.

The decision in In re Adobe Systems Inc. Privacy Litigation, No. 13-CV-05226-LHK (N.D. Cal. Sept. 4, 2014), is significant, as most other courts since the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Clapper v. Amnesty International USA, 133 S. Ct. 1138 (2013), have dismissed similar actions for lack of standing where data breach plaintiffs have not alleged actual misuse of their data.

In a series of recent decisions, defendants have successfully relied on Clapper to dismiss data breach class actions, seemingly without regard to the individual facts of each case. The Adobe decision is a reminder that the law remains unsettled in this active area of class action and data security litigation, and appears likely to spur additional lawsuits in California federal court.

In re Adobe Systems arose from a 2013 attack on Adobe's computer network, in which hackers gained unauthorized access to Adobe's servers, including their "Creative Cloud" platform, a subscription-based program where customers pay a monthly fee to access Adobe's products and services. Adobe collects a variety of personal information from its users, including names, email and mailing addresses, telephone numbers, passwords, and credit card numbers and expiration dates for millions of customers.

In July 2013, hackers attacked Adobe's servers and spent several weeks inside Adobe's network without detection. During this sophisticated, weeks-long intrusion, hackers removed gigabytes of customer data and Adobe source code, an intrusion that remained undiscovered until September 2013 when independent security researchers discovered stolen Adobe source code on the Internet. Adobe disclosed the data breach in October 2013, announcing that hackers had accessed personal information belonging to 38 million customers, including names, login IDs, passwords, credit and debit card numbers, expiration dates, and mailing and email addresses. Adobe also disclosed that hackers were able to decrypt customers' credit card numbers.

In the wake of the data breach, various plaintiffs whose personal information had been compromised brought actions against Adobe alleging numerous violations of California's Customer Records Act, Calif. Civil Code §§ 1798.81.5 and 1798.82, and seeking injunctive relief under California's Unfair Competition Law, Calif. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17200 et seq. Plaintiffs also sought a declaratory judgment that Adobe had breached its contractual obligations to provide reasonable security protection to its customers.

Clapper v. Amnesty International USA: Article III Standing and "Increased Risk of Harm"

Following in the footsteps of other data breach defendants, Adobe moved to dismiss all claims, arguing, among other things, that the plaintiffs lacked standing under Clapper v. Amnesty International USA. Clapper involved a challenge to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, where various attorneys at public interest and media organizations whose work required them to communicate with individuals outside of the United States argued that they were likely to be the subject of surveillance by the government. They claimed to have suffered injury based on "an objectively reasonable likelihood that their communications [would] be acquired [under FISA] at some point in the future." 133 S. Ct. at 1146.

The respondents in Clapper did not allege that any of their communications actually had been intercepted, or that the government even sought to target them directly. The Supreme Court thus concluded that their fears were "highly speculative" and based on a "highly attenuated" chain of possibilities that did not result in a "certainly impending" injury. Id. at 1148.

Since Clapper, federal courts in Ohio, Illinois, New Jersey and California have dismissed claims, concluding that increased risk of harm resulting from a data breach is insufficient to confer Article III standing. For instance, in In re Sci. Applications Int'l Corp. Backup Tape Data Theft Litig. (SAIC), No. 12-347 (JEB) (D.D.C. May 9, 2014), a thief stole encrypted backup data tapes containing personal medical information for over 4 million U.S. military members and their families out of the back of a car. The SAIC court concluded that plaintiffs had suffered no immediate injury because the thief would have needed to identify the tapes, obtain specialized equipment to read them, break the records' encryption, and view their contents with specialized software. The court thus found plaintiffs' injuries to be as attenuated as the chain of events rejected in Clapper.

Similarly, in Polanco v. Omnicell Inc., 988 F. Supp. 2d 451 (D.N.J. 2013), a thief stole a laptop out of a car. The plaintiffs did not allege that the thief targeted the laptop for its data or any actual misuse of their personal information, and were therefore dismissed for lack of standing.

In Galaria v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance, No. 2:13-cv-118 (S.D. Ohio, Feb. 10, 2014), victims of a data breach claimed they suffered harm because they were statistically more likely than the general public to become victims of fraud. The court, citing Clapper, found that the plaintiffs' injury could hardly be "certainly impending" when the harm they feared had "less than a 20% chance of occurring."

Adobe argued that Clapper had implicitly overruled Krottner v. Starbucks Corp., a 2010 Ninth Circuit decision which held that "the possibility of future injury may be sufficient to confer standing" where the plaintiff is "immediately in danger of sustaining some direct injury as the result of the challenged conduct." 628 F.3d 1139, 1142 (9th Cir. 2010). Unlike Clapper, Krottner was a data breach case where a thief stole a laptop from Starbucks containing unencrypted names, addresses and Social Security numbers of approximately 97,000 Starbucks employees.

Judge Koh disagreed with Adobe, holding that Clapper did not abrogate Krottner and did not fundamentally change the law of standing or reformulate "the familiar standing requirements of injury-in-fact, causation, and redressability." Rather, Judge Koh limited Clapper to its unique facts, stating that the Supreme Court "merely held that the Second Circuit had strayed from these well-established standing principles by accepting a too-speculative theory of future injury."

More significantly, Judge Koh concluded that even if Krottner no longer applied, plaintiffs still had standing under Clapper itself because "the risk that Plaintiffs' personal data will be misused by the hackers who breached Adobe's network is immediate and very real." Recognizing that hackers who intruded Adobe's computer systems deliberately targeted Adobe's servers and spent several weeks collecting names, usernames, passwords, email addresses, phone numbers, mailing addresses, and credit card numbers and expiration dates, and that some stolen data had already surfaced on the Internet, Judge Koh concluded that the danger that the plaintiffs' data would be misused was "certainly impending," and that plaintiffs need not wait until they suffer identity theft or credit card fraud in order to have standing.

Ultimately, Judge Koh trimmed some of the plaintiffs' claims, concluding that the plaintiffs had failed to establish any injury traceable to Adobe's failure to timely notify customers of the breach, and that some plaintiffs had not adequately pleaded injury under California's UCL. The court denied the remainder of Adobe's motion to dismiss, and gave the plaintiffs 30 days to file a seconded amended complaint curing the pleading deficiencies identified in the order.

Effect of the Decision

The Adobe decision creates new uncertainty for data breach defendants and raises some hope for class action plaintiffs and their lawyers. Before this opinion, only one other court had ruled that Article III standing exists without allegations of actual misuse of the breached information. See In re Sony Gaming Networks and Customer Data Sec. Breach Litig., 996 F. Supp. 2d 942 (S.D. Cal. Jan 21, 2014).

Judge Koh's decision demonstrates that data breach class actions can move forward even where plaintiffs cannot allege actual misuse of their data, at least in cases involving sophisticated hacker attacks where the intent to misappropriate data is obvious.

In light of the continued proliferation of data breaches, litigation in this area is likely to grow. Although the majority of courts have held that allegations of injury in the absence of misuse of data are insufficient to establish Article III standing under Clapper, the Adobe and Sony decisions are proof that the issue is far from settled.

Originally published in Law360, New York (September 24, 2014, 9:39 AM ET) --

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions