United States: Where Do Plaintiffs Stand On Data Breach Litigation?

Last Updated: July 7 2015
Article by Amy C. Purcell

Article III standing has been a data breach plaintiff's worst enemy (and, thus, a defendant's best friend). Courts have routinely dismissed data breach cases because plaintiffs cannot demonstrate that they have standing to bring claims against a company that suffered a data breach. Simply put, courts across many jurisdictions have subscribed to the proposition of "no harm, no foul." Despite this formidable obstacle, plaintiffs continue to pursue these types of claims.

Plaintiffs typically allege that, as a result of a data breach, they suffered injuries including an increased risk of identity theft or fraud, time and expenses incurred in efforts to mitigate the risk associated with identity theft or fraud, improper disclosure of their personal information and loss of privacy. Generally, to establish standing under Article III, a plaintiff must allege: (1) an injury in fact that is concrete and particularized, as well as actual and imminent; (2) that injury is fairly traceable to the challenged action of the defendant; and (3) that it is likely (not merely speculative) that injury will be redressed by a favorable decision. Historically, courts have found that data breach plaintiffs failed to meet this standard because the "possibility" of future harm was speculative.

In February 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Clapper v. Amnesty International USA, 133 S. Ct. 1138 (2013). Although Clapper did not involve a data breach, it quickly became data breach defendants' most powerful argument in support of a motion to dismiss. In Clapper, the plaintiffs argued that because their work required them to communicate with individuals outside the United States, they suffered injury because there was an "objectively reasonable likelihood" that their communications would be acquired under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, and that they took costly steps to protect the confidentiality of their communications. The Supreme Court concluded that the plaintiffs' fears were "highly speculative" and based on a "highly attenuated" chain of possibilities that did not result in a "certainly impending" injury. The court further held that the plaintiffs could not "manufacture" standing based upon money spent to protect against hypothetical future harm.

Seizing upon this reasoning, defendants in courts all across the country began to analogize the situation in Clapper to a data breach. For example, in In re Barnes & Noble Pin Pad Litigation, Case No. 12-cv-8617 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 3, 2013), relying on Clapper, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois granted Barnes & Noble's motion to dismiss and found that the plaintiffs lacked standing to bring an action against Barnes & Noble. The court held that the plaintiffs failed to allege an injury in fact that was "certainly impending" and that speculation of future harm does not constitute actual injury. The court found that an increased risk of identity theft does not constitute actual harm for purposes of standing. In addition, the court held that the "only cognizable potential injury" alleged by plaintiffs was a fraudulent charge on one of the plaintiff's credit cards. The court stated that, even if the fraudulent charge was due to Barnes & Noble's actions or inactions, the plaintiff alleged only that she was without the use of her credit card for an unspecified period of time until she received her replacement card. The court found this insufficient to establish standing because the plaintiff did not have an unreimbursed charge on her credit card and, thus, failed to allege an actual injury.

Since Clapper, the majority of courts have dismissed data breach claims based upon lack of standing. In fact, there are only a handful of cases that go against the trend. In 2014, the Northern District of California found that plaintiffs' allegations satisfied the standard articulated by the court in Clapper, in In re Adobe Systems Privacy Litigation, Civ. A. No. 13-05226 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 4, 2014). The plaintiffs argued that they had standing because they suffered three types of injuries: (1) increased risk of future harm; (2) costs to mitigate risk of future harm; and (3) loss of the value of their Adobe products. The court found that because certain of the data appeared on the Internet, the potential for misuse of that data was "certainly impending" and that the costs for credit monitoring were an injury in fact that conferred standing.

Initially, the Adobe case signaled that data breach plaintiffs might be gaining ground. Then, less than two weeks after the decision in Adobe, based upon a similar set of facts, the Northern District of Illinois found that data breach plaintiffs lacked Article III standing, in Remijas v. Neiman Marcus, Civ. A. No. 14-1735 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 16, 2014). Despite the fact that more than 9,000 card holders had unauthorized charges on their credit cards, the court held that the plaintiffs failed to allege "concrete" injuries because they did not allege that they would be held financially responsible for those charges. In addition, the court found that plaintiffs failed to allege "precise" costs for mitigating future risk of fraudulent charges and, thus, these costs were not a cognizable injury for purposes of standing. The Neiman Marcus case is pending before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

Perhaps recognizing the difficulty in overcoming the standing hurdle (and that the Adobe ruling was not as widely accepted as plaintiffs had hoped), data breach plaintiffs have started to assert statutory claims under, among others, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, Stored Communications Act, Telephone Consumer Privacy Act and Video Privacy Protection Act. Under these statutes, a plaintiff may be able to establish standing even without suffering any actual injury.

In Robins v. Spokeo, 742 F.3d 409 (9th Cir. 2014), the Ninth Circuit affirmed the trial court's decision finding that the plaintiff had standing to sue Spokeo under the Fair Credit Reporting Act for allegedly reporting inaccurate information on its website about the plaintiff's income and education. Even though the plaintiff did not suffer any concrete injury, the court held that he had standing based purely upon the fact that Spokeo's acts violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Certain appellate courts have agreed with the decision in Spokeo, while others have held that, without some sort of actual injury, a plaintiff cannot establish standing based solely upon a statutory violation. Although it denied certiorari on this same issue a few years ago, early this year, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari review of Spokeo. If the Supreme Court affirms the Ninth Circuit's decision, then, even without showing any actual injuries, plaintiffs will likely be able to rely upon statutory violations to advance their data breach claims.

At the moment, in the absence of any concrete injury, defendants in data breach cases continue to have the upper hand. However, the data breach litigation landscape is constantly changing and, like any other area of litigation, defendants must be prepared to refine their arguments in response to case law and plaintiffs' evolving theories of liability.

Originally published in The Legal Intelligencer

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions