European Union: 8-In-8 Recent Trends In European Law And Policy Alert Series: Update On Brexit And International Trade

This is the fifth issue of WilmerHale's 8-in-8 Recent Trends in European Law and Policy Alert Series. Our attorneys will share insights on current and emerging issues affecting companies doing business in Europe and across the Atlantic. Attorneys from across various practice groups at the firm will offer their take on issues ranging from Brexit to Big Data to EU energy market regulation. WilmerHale has offices in key European capitals, including Brussels, Berlin, Frankfurt and London, as well as lawyers qualified in a range of European countries. With one of the leading European law and policy practices in the world, we follow and work on a broad range of EU legal and policy issues, including data protection and privacy, competition, trade, technology, intellectual property, financial services, and a range of other EU and transatlantic regulatory and policy challenges that our clients face. Read all issues in this series and our other recent publications.

I. Introduction

This update considers some of the key trade issues facing the United Kingdom ('UK') and the European Union ('EU') in light of the UK's decision to leave the EU ('Brexit'). Most public and media attention on this topic to date has focused on the impact of Brexit as it pertains to trade relations between the UK and the EU; much less analysis has been undertaken with respect to the impact on the UK's membership in the World Trade Organization ('WTO') or its trade relations with third countries – including key UK trading partners such as the United States ('U.S.'). This update will discuss each of these topics in turn.

II. EU-UK Trade Negotiations for an FTA

The UK stated, at an early stage, that – following or as part of Brexit – it would like a bespoke comprehensive and ambitious Free Trade Agreement ('FTA') with the EU, covering both goods and services.1 At the same time, it has also indicated that it does not want to be in the European Economic Area2 ('EEA') – the extensive FTA that currently exists between the EU and certain other European countries such as Norway – or a customs union with the EU.3 The EU position similarly appears to be that the consequence of the UK's various negotiating limits ('so-called redlines') is that the UK would not be in any 'special' trading relationship, including a customs union.4 Instead, it would have to negotiate an FTA – that may or may not be comprehensive, ambitious, and/or bespoke.

Numerous existing FTA-type models have been discussed as possible precedents. The only mutually acceptable solution may be a framework similar to the FTAs that the EU has entered into with the Republic of Korea and Canada ('CETA'), but with a number of UK-EU specific provisions and/or chapters. For example, in each of these FTAs, the EU excluded coverage of sectors -- financial services being a notable example – which are likely to be crucial for an EU-UK FTA. Indeed, the UK for its part has already made it clear that it would like this and other sectors to be covered. In the words of its chief Brexit negotiator, David Davis, it wants a 'CETA plus, plus, plus'.5

For a number of industries, the UK has also expressed its desire that an EU-UK FTA be on similar terms as the current EU-UK relationship to guarantee no disruption in trade. For example, the UK wishes to continue current trade patterns for its car industry (with no duties on parts or finished cars); an outcome that it argues would be in both sides' interests. The UK is also particularly concerned about broadcasting and financial services,6 arguing, amongst other things, that its trade deficit in goods should be counterbalanced by its surplus in such services.7

A more detailed discussion of the ongoing negotiations between the EU and the UK and their status can be found here (see, in particular slides 2-24).

The UK has announced that it will publish a new 'White Paper' on the future EU-UK relationship shortly. The EU's position is that the 'principles' of that relationship should be agreed by October 2018 (together with other outstanding items in the Withdrawal Agreement) to allow for European Parliament review and finalization by March 2019.8

III. The UK's Membership in the WTO

The WTO, formally established in 1995, provides a global multilateral system for trading goods and services between WTO Members. Key principles include the 'most favoured nation' principle (WTO Members must offer the most favourable tariff and non-tariff treatment they would offer one particular trading partner to every other WTO Member) and 'national treatment' (i.e. non-discrimination between domestic and imported goods). WTO rules cover everything from customs duties and charges, to non-tariff regulatory and domestic taxation issues, subsidization, and intellectual property rights. In addition to general obligations of membership, all WTO Members undertake specific commitments in their goods and services schedules, which specify maximum tariff levels for goods and establish varying levels of commitments in specified services sectors.

In a sense, the WTO provides a worldwide ('multilateral') FTA, with rules and commitments that do not go as far and are often not as specific or tailored as most bilateral FTAs, but that set a basic floor and minimum rules to which all WTO Member countries are bound. In some areas, WTO rules go further than many bilateral or regional FTAs, including, in particular, in the area of dispute settlement/enforceability. As such, WTO membership is both critical for the UK in its own right – as it will help determine the country's trade relationship with all other WTO member countries – and has been described by some as a potential fall-back if EU-UK FTA negotiations fail.

The UK's WTO membership: current status and required process

The UK was a founding member of the WTO and remains a full and independent WTO Member in its own right. It is also a signatory to the majority of WTO agreements. As such, it will not need to re-apply to the WTO on leaving the EU, as some early reports and analyses erroneously suggested. However, some of the UK's more specific WTO commitments are currently a part of the joint EU goods and services schedules (just as the EU's commitments specifically include the UK market).

The UK Government's position on this issue is that, with respect to these more specific commitments, it must adopt its own standalone WTO schedules. The UK's International Trade Secretary, Liam Fox, has stated that the UK Government intends to submit new WTO schedules that will 'replicate [the] existing trade regime as far as possible' to ensure that trade with WTO partners is not disrupted. The UK's Department for International Trade (the 'DIT') has already initiated consultations with the WTO and its members to achieve this objective.

Because the WTO is a consensus-driven organization, it is possible that some WTO Members will take advantage of this process to raise objections to the UK's new schedules. However, this risk should not be overstated, as any such objections would likely be limited to arguments that a proposed change has reduced the value of a given concession or commitment, or that it does not accurately reflect the UK's WTO commitments. If the UK were unable to resolve such objections, the objecting Member(s) would have the option of challenging the UK's actions under WTO dispute settlement rules, but the challenge would take several years to resolve, and it would not directly impact the UK's ability to continue trading. In addition, the UK, the EU (which may need to update some of its own schedules as well), and other WTO Members will likely have a broad range of mutual incentives to come to a negotiated agreement instead. Overall disruption, in other words, is likely to be minimal.

The economic impact of trading under the WTO Rules

Most studies suggest that, as compared to a UK-EU 'deal' scenario, a 'no-deal' scenario – i.e. trading only under WTO rules – would likely have a significant negative economic impact on the UK. One of the key principles of the WTO, the most favoured nation principle, would require the EU to treat the UK 'no less favourably' than other WTO Members that are not members of the EU. In many sectors, this could result in higher tariffs and less favourable trade and regulatory treatment than the UK currently enjoys (the same would also be true the other way around).

The UK Government's own impact assessment9, referred to as the 'EU Exit Analysis', concluded that the UK will be economically worse off under the 'no-deal' scenario. It predicts that the UK will see a reduction in economic growth by 7.7% over the next 15 years. The document also suggests that major sectors of the UK economy will be affected, including chemicals, manufacturing, automobiles and retail. Other reports have estimated that at least some portion of goods exported from the UK to the EU would face at least some tariffs (with over 16% of goods exported potentially facing tariffs of over 7%). The same would be true in the other direction.

IV. Post-Brexit Trade Relationships

One key point that the EU and the UK have already agreed upon is that the UK may sign and ratify FTAs with third countries before Brexit (extended by the Transitional/Implementation Period that the UK and EU agreed to earlier this year10). However, the agreements cannot enter into force until the UK has left the EU. Thus, another important point from a trade perspective is that the UK's withdrawal from the EU will allow it to create its own independent trade policy and enter into trade agreements with non-EU countries. The DIT has stated explicitly that this is a key part of the UK's post-Brexit trade strategy.11

Non-EU countries, according to recent figures, account for 57% of the UK's exports. Some argue that number could grow substantially in a post-Brexit world. According to the EU Exit Analysis, new trade deals with these export markets could result in a total long-term increase of 0.2 to 0.7% of UK GDP. This could potentially mitigate the predicted reduction in economic growth that is expected in the 'no deal' scenario discussed above, as well as any potential negative effects of a post-Brexit EU-UK FTA that offers lesser or different levels of EU market access than the UK currently enjoys.12

Institutional framework: the UK's Department of International Trade (DIT)

Immediately after the Brexit referendum, the UK created the DIT, as noted above, led by International Trade Secretary, Liam Fox. The DIT was established to play a role similar to that of the European Commission's Directorate General for Trade (plus the trade-focused lawyers in the European Commission's Legal Service), or some combination of the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative ('USTR') and key externally focused divisions of the Department of Commerce in the U.S.

The DIT was tasked, among other things, to commence trade negotiations with non-EU countries. The 40-some FTAs that the UK currently benefits from through its membership in the EU will likely not survive automatically post-Brexit and will require re-negotiation or some sort of UK-specific deal. The DIT is responsible for this, as well as for negotiating new trade deals with other major export partners.13 The DIT has also been active in developing a UK-specific trade remedies law, whereby the UK would administer its own anti-dumping and anti-subsidy or 'countervailing duty' laws.14

A US-UK Trade Deal?

As the UK's largest trading partner, the U.S. is at the front of the queue for a potential bilateral agreement. The UK Government predicts that a comprehensive UK-U.S. trade agreement could result in 0.2% growth in UK GDP in the long-term.15 The two sides have already held initial discussions, including a first meeting of the U.S.-UK Trade and Investment Working Group in July 2017.16

It is too soon to say whether and when such negotiations could be successfully concluded. In the words of a former British ambassador to the US, the prospect of a 'generous' free trade deal with President Trump may be an 'illusion', and the attitude of the Trump Administration towards international trade and tariffs in recent months may foreshadow difficult negotiations. The Trump Administration's efforts to renegotiate the North American Free Trade Agreement ('NAFTA') have not borne fruit and President Trump has threatened more than once to withdraw from that trade agreement. The U.S. Government also recently applied tariffs to U.S. steel and aluminium imports from a wide range of countries, including the UK and other members of the EU. Many have also voiced concerns about the pressure that a U.S. trade deal might put on the UK's agriculture sector, as well as the risk that, in order to secure a deal, the UK Government will have to agree to lower regulatory standards and allow the imports of genetically-modified or hormone treated food products. This is currently a hotly debated issue in the UK, so it is far from clear how likely (or feasible) any such regulatory changes would be.

On the other hand, the UK may well see negotiations with the U.S. as a key tool not only to help further cement the strong economic, trade, and political relationship between the two countries that already exists, but also to create additional business opportunities, for example for the financial sector, as well as a range of other UK exports and global industries. Some even see the negotiations as a helpful opportunity to move further towards a more de-regulated economy, and closer to the model already in place in the U.S.

Trade Negotiations with ASEAN, the Commonwealth and other Non-EU Countries

In addition to negotiating with the U.S., the UK Government has also announced its intention to enter into agreements with other non-EU countries, including the Gulf Cooperation Council ('GCC'), ASEAN, China, India, Australia and New Zealand. According to UK Government estimates, this could add a further long-term increase of 0.1% to 0.4% to UK GDP. Other fast-growing countries, such as Malaysia, Egypt and Bangladesh, may also be attractive export markets for the UK post-Brexit.

As of April 2018, the DIT has set up trade working groups with 21 countries, including the U.S. Each of these effectively suggests the early start of FTA negotiations (such negotiations typically start informally through such so-called 'working groups' before commencing in a more formal way). There has also been some discussion of the UK negotiating to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership ('CPTPP'), the successor agreement to the Trans-Pacific Partnership ('TPP') which the U.S. negotiated with a range of Asian-Pacific countries, including Japan, Australia, New Zealand and others, and from which President Trump withdrew shortly after taking office.

* * *

This client update has aimed to offer a high-level overview of some of the key trade-related issues in the ongoing discussions about the UK's exit from the EU. A lot more is obviously happening, including in terms of the establishment of the UK Government's own anti-dumping and anti-subsidy or countervailing duty rules. WilmerHale's Trade, EU, and Brexit groups are actively following these and many related issues and would be happy to answer any follow-up questions that readers may have.


  1. See for instance, UK first 'White Paper' on the exit and new partnership with the EU available at:
  2. The EEA model is close to that of the EU. However, for the UK there are concerns about: (i) the free movement of persons; (ii)the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Union; and (iii) lack of involvement in EU rule/decision-making.
  3. See BBC News, Brexit: Hammond rejects business calls for customs union (23 May 2018) available at
  4. The EU position on the UK redlines and the models available for a trade relationship was outlined in a slide presented by Michel Barnier (European Commission Chief Negotiator) available at
  5. David Davis (UK Brexit Secretary of State) said the UK wants the agreement to extend to services: 'an overarching trade deal which has no tariffs. An overarching trade deal, including services. Canada, plus, plus, plus would be one way of putting it'. See BBC News, Brexit: David Davis wants 'Canada plus plus plus' trade deal (10 December 2017) available at
  6. See further the WilmerHale overview of "Brexit: Where are we now?" (as of 27 March 2018), available at, especially slides 25 to 32.
  7. The UK had an overall trade deficit of £72 billion with the EU in 2017. A surplus of £14 billion on trade in services was outweighed by a deficit of £96 billion on trade in goods. See Statistics on UK-EU trade, Briefing Paper No. 7851 of 1 May 2018 by Matthew Ward, House of Commons Library, available at
  8. A current focus is on a solution to the issue of the border between the Republic of Ireland, and Northern Ireland in the UK, insofar as that may involve customs and regulatory alignment as a 'backstop'. See the Joint Statement of the EU/UK negotiators on progress of negotiations under Article 50 TEU, 19 June 2018, at para.7, available at
  9. See EU Exit Analysis, Cross Whitehall Briefing (January 2018) available at
  10. See, e.g.,
  11. See EU Exit Analysis, Cross Whitehall Briefing (January 2018) available at See also Department of International Trade White Paper: Preparing for our future UK trade policy (5 January 2018) available at
  12. Another factor mentioned in several analyses is possible growth of the greater regulatory flexibility that the UK may have post-Brexit, which might account for another 2% additional GDP growth.
  13. As noted above, while the UK Government is not yet legally permitted under EU law to enter into any trade deals with third countries, it can take a significant number of steps in its negotiations with third countries before that time. This is agreed in the draft text on the UK's withdrawal from the EU ('the Withdrawal Agreement') published earlier this year and the Trade Bill currently before the UK House of Commons, both of which include the ability for the UK to negotiate and sign new trade agreements (which would then enter into force after Brexit). In practice, therefore, DIT teams have been working with several foreign governments already, both with a view to (re-)negotiating the UK's membership in the WTO, and towards potential future bilateral or regional trade agreements with certain key third countries.
  14. The DIT also intends to create a new network of trade commissioners to boost its capacity for investment and trade efforts overseas. See DIT, Preparing for our future UK Trade Policy (9 October 2017) available at
  15. See EU Exit Analysis, Cross Whitehall Briefing (January 2018) available at
  16. See Office of the US Trade Representative, Joint Release by USTR Ambassador Lighthizer and UK International Trade Secretary Dr Liam Fox (July 2017) available at

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions