Cayman Islands: The Cayman Restructuring Toolkit: Exploring The Flexible Restructuring Options On Offer In The Cayman Islands

Last Updated: 23 November 2018
Article by Sophie Kassam and Luke Petith


The Cayman Islands provisional liquidation regime has proven to be an extremely useful and flexible tool to assist with complex financial restructurings. In circumstances where a Cayman Islands company is insolvent or potentially insolvent, its board of directors must have regard to creditors' interests as a whole when discharging their fiduciary duties and ideally be engaging with the company's creditors in order to try and agree upon a consensual restructuring solution. However, such a consensual out-of-court process would typically require unanimous support (or acquiescence) from all of the company's creditors and therefore the company's board of directors may wish to consider alternative options to mitigate the risk that a disgruntled creditor may seek to disrupt any restructuring process by commencing proceedings against the company. This article focuses on the provisional liquidation regime in the Cayman Islands and how it can be a useful tool for companies who are facing an imminent debt crisis.

Provisional liquidation in the Cayman Islands – traditional v 'soft touch'

The traditional purpose of the appointment of provisional liquidators is to preserve and protect a company's assets pending the hearing of a winding up petition in respect of the company where there is evidence of potential dissipation or misuse of assets. In such circumstances, a creditor can make an application to the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands (the 'Grand Court') seeking the appointment of provisional liquidators to a company pursuant to section 104(2) of the Companies Law (2018 Revision) (the 'Companies Law').

However, the Cayman Islands provisional liquidation regime offers an alternative route to appointing provisional liquidators in circumstances where a Cayman Islands company intends to implement a financial restructuring. Pursuant to section 104(3) of the Companies Law, provisional liquidators can be appointed on a 'soft-touch' basis in order to protect the company from creditor enforcement action or proceedings being commenced or continued without the leave of the Court. The moratorium that is triggered on the appointment of provisional liquidators provides breathing space for a company to negotiate with its stakeholders and propose and implement a restructuring without the risk of the process being derailed by the actions of one or more dissenting creditors. Notably, however, such moratorium does not extend to restrict the rights of secured creditors who may enforce their security notwithstanding the appointment of provisional liquidators. Accordingly, standstill agreements with secured creditors or seeking supporting relief in other relevant jurisdictions (such as Chapter 15 in the United States) may still be necessary.

Pursuant to section 104(3) of the Companies Law, following the presentation of a winding up petition, a company may at the same time make an application seeking the appointment of provisional liquidators where (a) the company is or is likely to become unable to pay its debts; and (b) the company intends to present a compromise or arrangement to its creditors. There is no statutory definition of the terms 'compromise' or 'arrangement' in the Companies Law. The Grand Court typically construes these terms broadly but they must involve some element of 'give and take' on both sides.1 In practice, this can include a Cayman Islands scheme of arrangement, a Chapter 11 plan or restructuring, or a foreign scheme of arrangement

Provisional liquidation is available to any company liable to be wound up under the Companies Law following the presentation of a winding up petition against the company. Any creditor, shareholder, the company itself or (in respect of regulated businesses) the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority can apply for the appointment of provisional liquidators between the presentation and the hearing of the winding up petition. However, an application seeking the appointment of 'soft touch' provisional liquidators on restructuring grounds pursuant to section 104(3) of the Companies Law (that is, where a company is or is likely to become unable to pay its debts and the company intends to present a compromise or arrangement to its creditors) may only be made by the company itself (if properly authorised). Accordingly, as it stands a creditor can only make an application seeking the appointment of provisional liquidators where there is a genuine need to safeguard the assets of the company pending the hearing of a winding up petition and there are no provisions in the Companies Law which allow creditors to apply for the appointment of 'soft touch' provisional liquidators.

Whilst the presentation of a winding up petition is a necessary prerequisite to access the Cayman Islands provisional liquidation regime, 'soft touch' provisional liquidation does not necessarily result in the formal winding up of the debtor company. Rather, where a 'soft touch' provisional liquidation is used to support a successful financial restructuring where the debtor company survives, the end result is usually that the winding up petition is dismissed and the newly restructured company continues as a going concern. Provisional liquidation when used in a restructuring context in the Cayman Islands is therefore somewhat of a misnomer since the object of the proceedings is to typically rescue the company as a going concern rather than to liquidate and dissolve the company.

Provisional liquidators are officers of the Grand Court and agents of the company to which they owe fiduciary duties to act in good faith and in the interests of the company as a whole. However, the powers of the provisional liquidators are not circumscribed by statute and instead are expressly set out in the court order appointing them. Accordingly, there is scope for the provisional liquidation regime to be used with real flexibility in the context of a restructuring depending upon how much control over the process the provisional liquidators are intended to have.

In a 'soft touch' provisional liquidation, the provisional liquidators would typically work alongside the existing directors to develop and propose a restructuring without completely displacing the directors' powers. Ultimately, the order appointing the provisional liquidators will clearly set out which powers the provisional liquidators are able to exercise (often limited to oversight of the progress of the restructuring and reporting to the Grand Court and the company's creditors) and which powers will be retained by the directors.

Typically the Grand Court has been flexible in allowing sufficient time for the provisional liquidators to consider whether a restructuring is capable of being agreed and implemented in the circumstances. However, if it is evident to the Grand Court that there is no realistic prospect for a successful restructuring to be implemented and for the company to continue as a going concern, it is likely that the winding up petition will be listed and an order made for the appointment of official liquidators to the company.

Recent restructurings in the Cayman Islands

The Cayman Islands has recently seen a number of large cross-border restructurings in the Grand Court where companies have benefited from the flexibility of the 'soft touch' provisional liquidation regime. In June 2018, the Grand Court appointed 'soft touch' provisional liquidators to Abraaj Holding ('Abraaj'), the largest private equity fund in the Middle East, and its wholly owned subsidiary, Abraaj Investment Management Limited ('AIML'), both of which are Cayman Islands companies.2

One of Abraaj's creditors, The Public Institution for Social Security in Kuwait ('PIFSS'), presented a winding up petition in the Grand Court on 25 May 2018 on the grounds that Abraaj had failed to pay an undisputed debt and was therefore unable to pay its debts as they fell due. A week later, another creditor of Abraaj, Auctus Fund Ltd ('Auctus'), filed an application pursuant to section 104(2) of the Companies Law for the appointment of provisional liquidators to Abraaj and AIML on the grounds that the companies were being mismanaged by the incumbent management team and the appointment of provisional liquidators was necessary to avoid further mismanagement and the potential dissipation of assets. Auctus also presented a winding up petition in relation to AIML. In response to the applications filed by PIFFS and Auctus, Abraaj and AIML respectively filed applications with the Grand Court for the appointment of 'soft touch' provisional liquidators which were supported by a number of Abraaj and AIML's secured creditors.

In reaching its decision to appoint 'soft touch' provisional liquidators to Abraaj and AIML, the Grand Court noted that an application for the appointment of 'soft touch' provisional liquidators is only available to the company and cannot be made by a creditor under Cayman Islands law. In the circumstances, the Grand Court noted that Auctus' applications for the appointment of provisional liquidators to Abraaj and AIML, although alleging mismanagement of both companies, had accepted that provisional liquidators needed to be appointed with a mandate to promote a restructuring of Abraaj and AIML.

Whilst the Companies Law is clear on who may present a winding up petition and/or make an application for provisional liquidators to be appointed, the Grand Court has grappled on numerous occasions with the issue of whether or not the directors of a company are authorised to present a winding up petition in circumstances where they are not duly authorised by the company's shareholders. Such issue stems from what is known as the Emmadart principle, which originates from the English case of Re Emmadart Ltd.3 The effect of Emmadart was that the directors may only present a winding up petition in the name of the company if such action is authorised or ratified by the company's shareholders at a general meeting. The Emmadart principle has been upheld as applicable in the Cayman Islands, most recently in Re China Shanshui Cement Group Limited4 where Mangatal J held that a winding up petition presented by the company's directors was not valid on account of the directors not having been authorised by the shareholders to present the winding up petition. Accordingly, the Grand Court was bound to conclude that the directors' application to also appoint provisional liquidators must also fail given that the prerequisite winding up petition had not been validly presented.

That requirement for shareholder authorisation is also reflected in the Companies Law which provides that where the company's articles of association (if the company was incorporated post 1 March 2009) authorise the directors to do so, the directors may present a winding up petition without the sanction of a resolution of the shareholders passed at a general meeting. However, an issue arises in circumstances where the company was either incorporated prior to 1 March 2009 or the articles of association do not, in any event, authorise the directors to present a petition without shareholder authorisation. In a restructuring context, this could be fatal since extracting the necessary authorisation from shareholders who are economically disenfranchised may not be possible. Additionally, where the debtor is listed, extracting the necessary consent from a dispersed group of shareholders may be practically impossible or at least logistically challenging. As such, concern existed that if a company's directors were unable to present the necessary winding up petition in the name of the company due to a lack of shareholder authorisation, the company could not seek the appointment of 'soft touch' provisional liquidators in order to implement a restructuring. That concern has however been abated following the successful Cayman Islands restructuring of CHC Group Ltd5 ('CHC'), the world's largest commercial helicopter services provider, where the Grand Court determined that in certain circumstances, directors of a company can make an application for the appointment of 'soft touch' provisional liquidators without the need for a shareholders' resolution or authorisation in the company's articles of association.

The CHC restructuring was primarily achieved by way of a Chapter 11 proceeding in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas filed by CHC and certain of its subsidiaries. The CHC restructuring however envisaged a transfer of CHC's assets to a new Cayman Islands limited liability company which would become the parent company of the restructured group. The method of implementing that transfer involved an asset sale to be completed within the framework of a Cayman Islands provisional liquidation proceeding which required validation by the Grand Court. However, CHC's articles of association did not authorise the directors of CHC to present a winding up petition without shareholder authorisation. The solution was for an intra-group creditor to petition for the winding up of CHC, thereby opening the gateway for the company itself to apply for the appointment of 'soft touch' provisional liquidators. This caused the Grand Court to consider whether an application to appoint provisional liquidators required shareholder authorisation. The Grand Court found that shareholder authorisation was not required and that the decision in China Shanshui had ' bearing on the situation where there is a separate creditor winding up petition in existence and where in those limited circumstances there [is] an application by the company, through its directors, for the appointment of [joint provisional liquidators]'. The CHC decision is the first time that the Grand Court has provided a judgment confirming the validity of this work around.

Cayman Islands schemes of arrangement

There have been a number of recent high-profile cross-border restructurings in the Cayman Islands, such as Ocean Rig UDW Inc.6 and Mongolian Mining Corporation,7 where the scheme of arrangement process and 'soft touch' provisional liquidation regime were successfully used together to implement their respective debt restructurings. The sophisticated restructuring toolkit on offer has ensured that the Cayman Islands remains at the forefront as one of the premier jurisdictions of choice to implement complex cross-border restructurings.

A Cayman Islands scheme of arrangement is a court approved compromise or arrangement between a company and its creditors or shareholders. A scheme of arrangement is frequently used to implement a restructuring of a company's financial liabilities by varying or cramming in the rights of the relevant creditors and/ or shareholders of a company but may also be used to complete corporate transactions such as a group restructuring or reorganisation, acquisitions, mergers and take-private transactions. Accordingly, a scheme is not a formal insolvency process as such and the directors would remain in control of the company whilst formulating the terms of and promoting a scheme outside of a liquidation. It is however usual for a restructuring that is implemented by way of a Cayman Islands scheme of arrangement to be conducted within the framework of a 'soft touch' provisional liquidation so as to take advantage of the automatic stay on creditors' claims whilst the restructuring is ongoing. A scheme requires the approval of each class of affected stakeholder that is, at least a majority in number representing 75 per cent in value of those actually voting need to vote in favour of the terms of the proposed scheme at the court convened scheme meeting(s). Once the proposed scheme of arrangement has been approved by the relevant stakeholders and sanctioned by the Grand Court, all affected stakeholders will be bound by the terms of the scheme (including any dissenting stakeholders and/or any stakeholders that have not voted).

Proposed reform

It is proposed that a new court supervised restructuring moratorium regime will be in force in the Cayman Islands in the near future. The process would allow a company to petition for the appointment of restructuring officers to obtain a stand-alone restructuring moratorium (separate from the winding up regime) thereby offering companies with more avenues by which to benefit from an automatic stay on claims. In the meantime, 'soft touch' provisional liquidation is an extremely helpful tool for any Cayman Islands company that is considering its options in the face of a possible default, and provides a formal Court led process, and statutory protection, in order to effectively restructure its debt and continue as a going concern.


1 Re XL Capital Ltd (unreported, Smellie CJ, Cause No. FSD 66 of 2010) (5 March 2010).

2 Abraaj Holdings, (unreported, McMillan J, Cause No. FSD 95 of 2018) (June 2018).

3 Re Emmadart Ltd [1979] Ch 540.

4 Re China Shanshui Cement Group Limited [2015] (2) CILR 255.

5 In the matter of CHC Group Ltd (unreported, McMillan J, Cause No. FSD 5 of 2017) (24 January 2017).

6 Ocean Rig UDW Inc., (in provisional liquidation) and others (unreported, Parker J, Cause Nos. FSD 100, 101, 102 and 103 of 2017) (18 September 2017).

7 Mongolian Mining Corporation (unreported, McMillan J, Cause Nos. FSD 99 of 2016) (7 July 2016).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions