India: Court Cannot Appoint The Arbitrator In Case Arbitration Clause Is Contained In An Unstamped Or Insufficiently Stamped Agreement: Supreme Court

Last Updated: 20 May 2019
Article by Krrishan Singhania and Srishti Singhania

The Supreme Court in Garware Wall Ropes Ltd. v. Coastal Marine Constructions & Engineering Ltd.1, held that the Court cannot appoint the arbitrator in case the arbitration clause is contained in an unstamped or insufficiently stamped agreement. This judgment overruled the Bombay High Court judgment in Gautam Landscapes Pvt. Ltd. v. Shailesh S. Shah & Anr.2, wherein the Court held that on an application for the appointment of the arbitrator, the Courts should not await the adjudication of the stamp authorities in case the agreement is unstamped or not adequately stamped and go ahead to appoint the arbitrator.

Factual Background

Garware Wall Ropes Ltd. (Appellant) hired Coastal Marine Constructions & Engineering Ltd. (Respondent) for installation of a geotextile tubes embankment with toe mound at village Pentha in Odisha for protection against coastal erosion. Parties entered into a sub-contract agreement which contained an arbitration clause. Disputes arose between the parties, the Appellant terminated the sub-contract.

Respondent sent a notice for appointment of sole arbitrator. Appellant replied stating that the appointment is unacceptable as invocation of arbitration in pursuance of the agreement is premature. Respondent, therefore, filed a petition for appointment of the arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Act) before the Bombay High Court. The petition was allowed by the Court and sole arbitrator was appointed to adjudicate upon the arisen disputes between the Parties.

Aggrieved by the order of the Bombay High Court, Appellant filed an appeal in the Supreme Court. The question raised in the appeal was as to what is the effect of an arbitration clause contained in an unstamped or inadequately stamped agreement.

Appellant's contentions

  • Appellant based its arguments on the merits of the judgement passed in the case of in SMS Tea Estates (P) Ltd. v. Chandmari Tea Co. (P) Ltd.3 e case, Section 33 and 35 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (similar to Section 33 and 34 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958) mandates the judicial authorities to impound such instruments, which cannot be admitted in evidence or cannot be acted upon until duly stamped. Thus, the agreement containing the arbitration clause should be impounded before appointment of the arbitrator.
  • It was argued that the 246th Law Commission Report which led to the amendment contained in Section 11(6A) of the Act does not disturb the precedence set by the SMS Tea Estates4. He articulates that as a result of operation of law, an instrument is to be impounded, upon which stamp duty and penalty (if any) are then to be paid, must be followed as Section 11(6A) does not seek to interfere with the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, at all.

Respondent's contentions

  • Respondent argued that the case at hand should be adjudged according to the provisions of Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015. The object of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015, in introducing Section 11(6A), was to confine the Court hearing the Section 11 application to examination of the 'existence' of an arbitration agreement. Respondent stated that the provisions of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, are a fiscal measure intended merely to collect revenue and, if at all, will question the 'validity' of an arbitration agreement and not its 'existence'.
  • Further, the Respondent's counsel argued that an arbitration agreement once in writing, is independent of the agreement in which it is contained. Hence, when a Court hears an application under Section 11 of the Act, it is just to appoint an arbitrator for furtherance of justice. The Court should not engage in a mini-trial at the Section 11 stage, impounding the agreement that contains an arbitration clause.
  • Respondent also emphasised upon Section 11(13) of the Act, which states that application for appointment of the arbitrator ought to be disposed-off within a period of 60 days from the date of service of the notice. This would be impossible to achieve if questions relating to stamping were to be decided at the Section 11 stage, thereby defeating the object of the amendment.
  • Another argument that came up was that it is the Appellant who is to pay stamp duty under the Indian Contract Act, 1872. By impugning the agreement, it will end up in him taking advantage of its own wrong and benefitting from his own mistake.


The Supreme Court ordered that while proceeding with the Section 11 application, the High Court must impound the instrument which has not borne stamp duty. It must hand over the agreement to the authority under the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958, who will then decide issues relating to payment of stamp duty and penalty (if any) preferably within a period of 45 days.

Once that is done, any of the parties can bring the instrument to the notice of the High Court for the hearing. Consequently, an arbitrator can be appointed for the disposal of the Section 11 application. The arbitrator can then proceed to decide the dispute within the time frame provided under Section 29A of the Act.

The Supreme Court relied heavily on the rationale applied in the case of SMS Tea Estates5. The logical inferences that helped Supreme Court construe the judgement are as follows:

  • When a contract or instrument is voidable at the option of a party (as for example under Section 19 of the Contract Act, 1872), the invalidity that attaches itself to the main agreement may also attach itself to the arbitration agreement. It so happens if the reasons which make the main agreement voidable exist in relation to the making of the arbitration agreement also.
  • Therefore, the Court should, before admitting any document into evidence or acting upon such document, examine whether the instrument/document is duly stamped. If not, Section 35 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, bars the said document being acted upon. Consequently, even the arbitration clause therein cannot be acted upon. The Court should then proceed to impound the document under Section 33 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, and follow the procedure under Sections 35 and 38 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899. By doing so, the Supreme Court or High Court is only giving effect to the provisions of a mandatory enactment which, no doubt, is to protect revenue. It is important to remember that the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, applies to the agreement or conveyance as a whole. Therefore, it is not possible to bifurcate the arbitration clause contained in such agreement or conveyance so as to give it an independent existence.
  • When an arbitration clause is contained "in a contract", it is significant that the agreement only becomes a contract if it is enforceable by law. Under the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, an agreement does not become a contract, namely, that it is not enforceable in law, unless it is duly stamped. Therefore, even a plain reading of Section 11(6A), when read with Section 7(2) of the Act and Section 2(h) of the Contract Act, 1872, would make it clear that an arbitration clause in an agreement would not exist when it is not enforceable by law.

Our Analysis

A quick look at the object of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, will convince one to consider the provisions of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, as a fiscal measure, the principal object of which is to secure revenue for the State. The object of the enactment is not to enable parties to raise technical objections to meet the case of their opponent.6

On the contrary, the whole object and scheme of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act was to secure an expeditious resolution of disputes.7 Moreover, the purpose of the 2015 amendment was to facilitate and encourage alternative dispute mechanism, especially arbitration, for settlement of disputes in a more user-friendly, cost effective and expeditious manner since India is committed to improve its legal framework to facilitate disposal of cases.

As per sub-section (6-A) of Section 11 of the Act, the power of the Court has now been restricted only to examination of the existence of an arbitration agreement. This is also followed in the judgments of the Supreme Court in SBP and Co. v. Patel Engg. Ltd.8 and National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Boghara Polyfab (P) Ltd.9 and was even reiterated in the judgement of Duro Felguera v. Gangavaram Port Ltd.10

The precedence set by the said judgement will only open a flood-gate of litigation, allowing the parties to take objection in order to delay the arbitral proceedings. This will adversely affect the pro-arbitration regime and disallow the system from a speedy, hassle free dispute resolution mechanism.

The entire exercise will prove to be more cumbersome in situations when either of the parties or even both the parties are of foreign origin with the arbitration seated in India. Moreover, where the unstamped agreement seated in India is between an Indian party and a foreign party then the foreign party in desperation will end up paying the opposition party's stamp duty obligations and incur yet additional time and money for the disposal of justice. All of this will hamper the image of India aiming to become a hub for international commercial arbitration.

In case this judgment is applied to applications for interim measures under Section 9 of the Act, then the parties seeking urgent remedy will have to get the document impounded first before the Court adjudicates upon their substantive rights. This will make applications under Section 9 of the Act lengthy and may also make the Section 9 proceedings unfruitful.

This issue of an arbitration clause being in an unstamped or insufficiently stamped agreement can be resolved by allowing the parties to impound the documents after the Court appoints the arbitrator under Section 11 of the Act. No prejudice would be caused to any party if the arbitrator were to commence the arbitration and if at all desirous, ask the parties to impound the documents containing the arbitration clause thereafter. This will also ensure that none of the parties are benefitted from their own wrong and safeguard India's image of being a pro-arbitration jurisdiction.

In alternative, the Court should clarify that this judgment will only apply to current and future agreements where the arbitration has not commenced. Such clarification will avoid any further delays in the arbitration process by not allowing the parties to raise objections regarding the stamping of agreements in front of the court or the arbitrator.

In most of the jurisdictions, there is no requirement of payment of stamp duties on commercial contracts. Therefore, in a matter of international commercial arbitration, where one of the parties is from foreign jurisdiction, the obligation to pay the stamp duty shall be on the Indian party. Further, the legislature should put a uniform stamp duty in all the commercial agreements or should remove any stamp duty where the agreement includes the possibility of international commercial arbitration.

1 Civil Appeal No. 3631 of 2019.

2 Arbitration Petition No. 466 of 2017.

3 (2011) 14 SCC 66.

4 Ibid.

5 SMS Tea Estates (P) Ltd. v. Chandmari Tea Co. (P) Ltd., (2011) 14 SCC 66.

6 J.M.A Raju v. K. Bhatt, AIR 1976 Gujarat 72.

7 Gas Authority of India Ltd. v. Keti Construction (I) Ltd., (2007) 5 SCC 38

8 (2005) 8 SCC 618.

9 (2009) 1 SCC 267.

10 (2017) 9 SCC 729.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Link Legal India Law Services
In association with
Practice Guides
by Mondaq Advice Centres
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Link Legal India Law Services
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions