United States: Federal District Court Rules OCC Lacks Authority To Issue FinTech Charters

On May 2, 2019, a court in the Southern District of New York ("SDNY") held that the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency ("OCC") lacked the statutory authority to charter nondepository special purpose national banks (the so-called "FinTech Charter"). In denying, with one exception, the OCC's motions to dismiss claims by New York's Department of Financial Services ("DFS"), the Court held that the OCC could not charter a nondepository "national bank" because the National Bank Act "unambiguously requires that, absent a statutory provision to the contrary, only depository institutions are eligible to receive national bank charters from the OCC."

On July 31, 2018, the OCC announced it would begin to accept and review applications for the FinTech Charter after previously deferring action in response to state regulator opposition. In response, on September 14, 2018, DFS refiled its litigation challenging the OCC's authority to grant FinTech Charters. The DFS asserted three claims: (1) the OCC did not have authority to grant FinTech Charters because the "business of banking" under the National Bank Act (12 U.S.C. § §24 (Seventh) and 27(a))requires "receiving deposits", (2) similarly the OCC overstepped its authority in adopting its 2003 chartering regulation (12 C.F.R. § 5.20(e)(1)) because the regulation did not condition a national bank charter on "receiving deposits", and (3) the proposed FinTech Charter violates the Tenth Amendment of the United States Constitution.

After assessing the statutory language and history of the National Bank Act, as well as its meaning within the broader context of other banking laws, the court upheld DFS's claims that the OCC had overstepped its authority. The court analyzed the meaning of the OCC's authority to charter national banks by reviewing the meaning of "business of banking". Tracing the meaning back to the original National Bank Act in 1863, the court concluded that the activities identified as part of the "business of banking" – including receiving deposits – in predecessor versions of 12 U.S.C. § 27(a) are mandatory parts of the business of any national bank. In the court's view, this requirement was unambiguous. Accordingly, the court found 12 C.F.R. § 5.20 and, therefore, the FinTech Charter exceeded the OCC's statutory authority.

Separately, the court dismissed DFS's Tenth Amendment claimbecause DFS had claimed that the OCC exceeded its statutory authority and not, as required for a Tenth Amendment claim,that Congress had exceeded its constitutional authority by intruding into authority left to the states under the amendment.

What does it mean?

For the states, the decision represents a major victory in their effort to prevent a federal take-over of the regulation of nonbank FinTech companies. While the OCC is likely to appeal either now or upon final disposition of the case, and it represents only a single decision in the SDNY, the court's conclusion buttresses the current model relying principally on state regulation of FinTech businesses.

For the OCC, the decision is a significant rebuff of its long-standing regulatory position. Under 12 C.F.R. § 5.20(e), which was adopted in 2003, the OCC claimed that it had the authority under the NBA to charter national banks so long as the chartered entity conducted at least one of the following three activities that it deemed core banking activities: check cashing, receivingdeposits or lending money. Interestingly, the Court viewed the OCC's adoption of § 5.20(e) in 2003, over 140 years after the NBA first granted the OCC authority to charter national banks, as reason to doubt the OCC's interpretation of its authority.

In the short term the decision clearly makes the FinTech Charter less appealing and probably means that the OCC will not grant a FinTech Charter for some time – even outside the SDNY. Why would an applicant seek a charter that, for now, will be challenged immediately upon approval and lead to significant expenditures for legal representation before starting operations?

For market participants, the decision is frustrating because the current inconsistent and complex regulatory frameworks across 50 states plus the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico make conducting a nationwide business more costly, more operationally complex, and more subject to diverging standards.

To date, the states have become the principal regulators of many FinTech activities because of the jurisdictional constraints on federal regulators, such as the SEC, CFTC, and banking regulators. The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, part of Treasury, has provided helpful guidance and imposes reporting and other requirements on money services businesses.

Notably, the states have generally applied pre-existing statutory and regulatory frameworks to digital asset businesses, with the notable exception of New York, which created the BitLicense regulatory framework in 2015. Some other states, such as Wyoming, have adopted digital asset-specific amendments to existing laws, while others, such as Pennsylvania and Texas, have provided guidance to how existing laws apply to digital assets (principally cryptocurrencies).

State regulation of cryptocurrency transactions and businesses has followed a money transmitter-based model and has focused on the movement of money, or in some cases cryptocurrencies, as part of digital asset exchanges or transfers.

State regulation of other FinTech businesses, such as online lending and data aggregation, has tended to be based on state privacy and consumer protection regulatory and enforcement frameworks. FinTech payments companies similarly face many different standards across the states.

Market participants are already looking for alternatives. The current inconsistencies and contradictions between state regulators makes the state alternative unappealing. If the states wish to be a preferred regulator, then the rapid development of consistent, reasonable state regulation with ample reciprocity from state to state is imperative. The Conference of State Banking Commissioners is seeking to develop a more consistent framework for some FinTech businesses, but that may be a lengthy process.

Other options such as the Industrial Loan Company ("ILC") charter are also laden with question marks. Although the ILC charter would permit a deposit–taking FinTech company to operate in many of the same ways as a national bank, while avoiding Federal Reserve holding company oversight, the ILC has historically been controversial in the banking community.Current Chairman Jelena McWilliams clearly does not have the negative attitude to ILCs as former Chairman Martin Gruenberg, but it remains to be seen whether and how she will wade into the tricky currents of opposition to ILCs among many bankers.


Stay tuned. The United States requires a consistent national legal framework to govern businesses that have a nationwide – and international – scope of operations. State law provides important consumer protections. However, the inconsistencies in state laws today do not provide an efficient or effective regulatory framework.

The SDNY decision simply reflects the trade-offs that our federal system imposes in economic and financial regulation. Nonetheless, it is imperative that we navigate those trade-offs to develop a more consistent regulatory framework if we are to harness the potential that FinTech businesses, like the Internet today, represent for the future.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions