The solvency test for the payment of dividends has been in effect for two years. It was hailed as enabling the liberation of about $100 billion in franking credits on corporate Australia's collective balance sheet to Australian investors.

However, the ATO's final view in Taxation Ruling TR 2012/5 (released last week on the eve of the reporting season for the 2012 financial year) threatens this objective. The ATO have held firm in their general position that any dividends paid by companies where net assets are below share capital are unfrankable, but with particular exceptions. Accordingly, companies should now be able to consider the declaration and payment of franked dividends with a higher degree of certainty than has been the case in this past 12 months.

We disagreed with the blanket position taken by the ATO in their Draft Fact Sheet released in June 2011 as we considered it to be contrary to the policy intent of this law reform.

Our understanding of the initial ATO view was that any dividends paid by companies where net assets are below share capital cannot be franked, irrespective of source (be it current-period profits or a reserve). Our view has always been that a dividend can be franked if it can be sourced from a positive 'profit' account, despite net assets being less than share capital.

The ATO seemed to soften their position in Draft Taxation Ruling TR 2011/D8 (released on 21 December 2011). In this Draft Ruling, the general ATO view was that dividends paid out of profits in accordance with the new section 254T of the Corporations Act 2001 can be franked, notwithstanding the existence of prior year losses or net assets being less than share capital. For further information on the Draft Ruling, please read the Moore Tax News article prepared by Stephen O'Flynn, Simon Tucker and Gopi Yogeswaran of Moore Stephens Melbourne on 17 January 2012.

The Final Ruling provides further clarification on a number of issues raised in submissions made for the Draft Ruling. In particular, it:

  • specifically excludes amounts disclosed as 'Other comprehensive income' from the definition of 'profits' for the purposes of this Ruling;
  • confirms that 'profits' must be recognised in the stand-alone accounts of the company (as opposed to the consolidated accounts of a corporate group);
  • approves the practice of transferring current-year profits to a separate 'profit appropriation reserve' from which frankable dividends could be paid both now and in the future. This can only be done as a result of a directors resolution reflected in the accounts or approving the accounts. Without this evidence, profits offset or netted against accumulated losses in the accounts will generally be viewed as being no longer available for dividend distribution; and
  • states that it also applies to private companies even if they are not required to maintain audited accounts kept in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards.

If you have any questions in relation to this Ruling, please contact the author or your Moore Stephens relationship partner.

This publication is issued by Moore Stephens Australia Pty Limited ACN 062 181 846 (Moore Stephens Australia) exclusively for the general information of clients and staff of Moore Stephens Australia and the clients and staff of all affiliated independent accounting firms (and their related service entities) licensed to operate under the name Moore Stephens within Australia (Australian Member). The material contained in this publication is in the nature of general comment and information only and is not advice. The material should not be relied upon. Moore Stephens Australia, any Australian Member, any related entity of those persons, or any of their officers employees or representatives, will not be liable for any loss or damage arising out of or in connection with the material contained in this publication. Copyright © 2011 Moore Stephens Australia Pty Limited. All rights reserved.