Australia: Sea level rise impact on coastal development must now be taken into account

Planning Update (Australia)
Last Updated: 21 June 2013
Article by Mark Baker-Jones

After 35 days of hearing, the Queensland Planning and Environment Court has delivered its most significant climate change adaptation decision yet. Rainbow Shores P/L v Gympie Regional Council & Ors1 sets a new precedent for decision makers considering development in the Queensland coastal zone.

To date, climate change adaptation has surfaced as an issue in only a handful of Queensland planning court cases. A summary of these key cases follows:


The first, although more a precursor to than an actual climate change case itself, identified an important principle. It found that the court was not a planning authority and therefore it was not the court's responsibility to set design standards for development susceptible to the impacts of extreme weather events.

In its 2003 decision of Daikyo (North Qld) Pty Ltd v Cairns City Council & Ors2 , the Planning and Environment Court considered the appropriateness of a condition imposed on a proposed 60 hectare residential and tourist accommodation development, a development similar in nature to that of Rainbow Shores. The planning authority, the Cairns City Council, in an attempt to avoid the development being exposed to marine inundation during cyclones, sought to impose a condition requiring the development to meet certain design standards. The standards, in light of recent, although anecdotal, evidence about wave run-up penetration, required higher floor levels than those required for earlier, neighbouring development. The court noted that if the higher standards were accepted, it would be impractical to allow infill or redevelopment works in much of Cairns, including the CBD and airport as well as in Townsville and Mackay (large areas of which are now mapped as coastal hazard areas - see below).

Not prepared to assume the role of arbiter of the appropriate standard, the court decided the condition was unreasonable and should not have been imposed. Although the court considered prophetically that while research would one day change the way we look at the effect of cyclones, it concluded that it was not the court's function to preempt proper consideration by the council and other relevant bodies of that research.

A year later in 2004, another application for an integrated residential and tourism development (68 hectares) was before the Planning and Environment Court. In Mackay Conservation Group Inc v Mackay City Council3 the court was asked to consider cyclonic risk in an appeal by the conservation group against a decision by the Mackay City Council to approve the development. Although not the fundamental objection to the development, one issue in the appeal was a concern about public safety and risk from storm surge. The court refused the appeal, and in doing so, allowed the development to proceed. While accepting that the current standards safeguarding against inundation would prove inadequate, the court, following Daikyo, was satisfied that it was not its responsibility to set the standards. It was human nature, the court said, to live or holiday in areas under threat from disaster of one kind or another "if the benefits by way of a pleasant environment, economic activity, adherence to some tradition or other, et cetera, are judged to make the risk worth taking"; and while there was a lack of clear policy to take the necessary steps to protect human life from the most severe events, "the Court's approach ought not be dictated by the anticipated folly or stubbornness of the recalcitrants who refuse to follow direction issued to keep them safe". Again , the court acknowledged the changes that further research might effect, recommending that "the door should be kept open to admit [those] further changes if new technical advice ... dictates them".


Two years later, in 2006, the first real climate change adaptation case appeared.

In the matter of Charles & Howard Pty Ltd v Redland Shire Council4 , the Planning and Environment Court dismissed an appeal by a developer who was seeking to change a condition of an approval that confined the location of a house he intended to build. The decision was appealed to the Court of Appeal.

The main issue was whether the council could impose a condition requiring the proposed house to be located on the western part of the land. The council wanted the house to be located there because it was above the one in a hundred year flood level. For convenience of access to the site, the appellant wanted the house located on the eastern part, which was below the one in a hundred year flood level, and intended to place fill there to raise the ground level. The primary judge's decision to dismiss the appeal was supported by evidence before the court that the appellant's proposed building site may be vulnerable to rising sea levels because of climate change. The decision was upheld by the Court of Appeal5 which found that the primary judge was entitled to take into account the impact of climate change on sea levels.

Despite this rather pioneering decision, the next case in Queensland did not appear for another six years. In the matter of Copley v Logan City Council & Anor6 , an appeal was filed against a decision by what is now the Logan City Council to approve a development application for a small 25 lot rural residential development. Local resident, Mr Copely, raised a number of grounds as to why the application should be refused but was unsuccessful on all but one.

Mr Copely submitted that upon consideration of: the impact of flooding on the subject site in 1947, 1974 and 1976; the more severe impacts from the floods before and including 1887 and the 1893; anticipated new flood levels based on climate change sea level rise predictions; and that prospective buyers of land at the subject site would be unforgiving if they were to find out that their inundated homes were built with a full knowledge that flooding was inevitable, the development would be unacceptable. The applicant sought to strike out Mr Copely's appeal but the court found that whereas the development complied with the planning scheme standards relevant to flooding, it was not prepared to determine that a reasonable cause of action had not been raised or that Mr Copely had no prospect of succeeding in the appeal.


We now arrive at Rainbow Shores, where, by its decision delivered on 13 June, the court has dismissed an appeal by the developer of a large integrated resort and residential community at Rainbow Beach on the basis of its potential exposure to erosion, storm surge and climate change related sea level rise.

The subject land was overlaid by coastal hazard mapping. The court noted that mapping of coastal hazards has been carried through from State Planning Policy 3/11: Coastal Protection - which took effect in 3 February 2012 and was subsequently suspended in October that year - to its replacement by what is currently draft coastal protection state planning regulatory provisions, this being the type of policy found wanting in Mackay Conservation Group.

Having considered evidence as to the extent to which the proposed development would potentially be subject to storm surge, including having regard to potential sea level rise consequent upon climate change, the court has found that a greater part of the site (approximately 17 hectares) would be potentially susceptible to storm surge inundation unless protected by measures such as dune enhancement, boundary level enhancement or rock walls. In dismissing the appeal and thereby disallowing the development to proceed, the judge stated, at paragraph [360]:

It would, in my view, be unwise to grant a preliminary approval, which is to set the framework for substantial development over a long period of time in this locality, without ensuring that the future development is protected from potential inundation. The appellant impliedly accepts that general proposition, since it accepts that its proposal should make allowance for the 100 year ocean surge level. Once that is accepted, it is difficult to justify ignoring the current predictions of sea level rise which affect the identification of that proportion of the site which is potentially susceptible. The [Plan of Development] is inadequate in its current form.

At the same time as recognising that the concept of climate change adaptation is not new in Queensland coastal policy and therefore a matter that the courts must have regard for, the decision recognises that predicted long term climate change impacts, at least in respect of sea level rise, must be considered when deciding development applications for development proposed in the coastal zone.


The decision in Rainbow Shores marks a critical point in planning law and sends an important message to coastal planning decision makers about the increasing relevance to coastal development of sea level rise and climate change related coastal inundation. It brings together the body of case law in Queensland that allows planning decision makers to consider whether development will be affected by the climate change impact on sea level rise and the requirement to assess development against state planning policy that identifies coastal hazards. Consequently, where development is proposed in a coastal hazard area and is potentially susceptible to storm surge inundation, unless otherwise protected, it is unlikely to be approved. This will have significant implications for coastal development throughout Queensland, as the court in Daikyo predicted.


1 [2013] QPEC 26.
2 [2013 QPELR 606.
3 [2006] QPELR 209.
4 [2006] QPEC 095.
5 Charles & Howard Pty Ltd v Redland Shire Council (2007) 159 LGERA 349.
6 [2012] QPEC 39.

© DLA Piper

This publication is intended as a general overview and discussion of the subjects dealt with. It is not intended to be, and should not used as, a substitute for taking legal advice in any specific situation. DLA Piper Australia will accept no responsibility for any actions taken or not taken on the basis of this publication.

DLA Piper Australia is part of DLA Piper, a global law firm, operating through various separate and distinct legal entities. For further information, please refer to

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions