Australia: Shipping amd container detention charges - Lloyds List Australia – Hazel Brasington

Last Updated: 29 April 2015
Article by Hazel Brasington

Some recent court decisions shed new light on the law concerning container detention charges, write Hazel Brasington and Dean Kambovski.

This article was originally published by Lloyd's List Australia and has been reproduced with permission.

Container detention charges – up in the air again?

Shipping companies would find it difficult to keep container stock moving efficiently without charging cargo interests a daily rate for overdue containers. For the most part, cargo interests accept this as a necessary evil, but overprotective container detention terms cause friction and have received airplay in Australian courts.

The English High Court, meanwhile, has recently taken a fresh look at whether escalating and unending charges can be enforced regardless of the circumstances. What does this all mean for Australia?

The current Australian position

Container demurrage had surprisingly little judicial consideration in Australia until 2010, when the NSW Consumer Trader and Tenancy Tribunal found that a daily container "detention fee" imposed by a bill of lading, was an unenforceable penalty, on the basis that it was extravagant and unconscionable in comparison to the greatest loss that could conceivably be proved to have flowed from the breach of contract by the shipper. That decision was overturned on appeal to the Supreme Court of NSW on technical jurisdictional grounds. This meant that it was unnecessary for the Court to deal with the central question about the enforceability of the charges.

However in 2011, the question returned to the Tribunal in a different case and it was determined that daily charges payable for late return of containers were not penalties. It characterised them as agreed compensation for possession and use of the containers and found that the charges did not arise from a breach of contract.

In 2012, the New South Wales District Court made a similar determination concerning Cosco Container Lines' "Impor Net Agreement". Although it required return of the containers after 10 days "free time", no amount was immediately payable if this was not done. This meant the charges were not penalties because again, they did not arise from a breach of the contract. Accordingly, at this point, it appeared reasonably settled that a breach of contract was the necessary trigger to detention charges being determined to be unenforceable penalties.

Then came Andrews v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd in which the High Court (in the context of bank fees and charges) found that the penalty doctrine may apply in circumstances where the payment is not triggered by a breach of contract. The High Court also emphasised a distinction between a fee that is security for performance of an obligation and a fee under a pre-existing arrangement for the provision of further services or accommodation. There has as yet been no further judicial determination as to how this distinction might be applied in the context of container detention. However, this might not be the case for long. The Australian law on contractual penalties continues to evolve with the Full Federal Court just (at the time of writing) having reversed the first instance decision in the bank fees class action Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2015] FCAFC 50.

The English position

English High Court - MSC v Cottonex Anstalt [2015] EWHC 283

An English case decided late last year, concerned a cargo of cotton discharged at Chittagong in mid-2011. Luckily for Cottonex, it had been paid for most of the cargo just before a collapse in the price of cotton at that time.

The Consignee never made any attempt to collect the cargo and the Bangladesh customs authorities would not allow anyone to remove the containers without a Court order. In September 2011, the carrier, Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC) notified both shipper and consignee that it reserved the right to dispose of the cargo if not collected holding each responsible for all costs and charges. Cottonex denied liability on the basis that title to the goods had passed on payment.

MSC's clause stated:

"The Carrier allows a period of free time for the use of the Containers in accordance with the Tariff... The Merchant is required and has the responsibility to return ... the Container ... before or at the end of the free time allowed at the Port of Discharge or the Place of Delivery. Demurrage, per diem and detention charges will be levied and payable by the Merchant thereafter in accordance with the Tariff."

MSC also had the right to unpack and store the goods and, if they remained unclaimed, to abandon or dispose of them.

After a 14 day "free" period, the applicable demurrage charge was US$10 per container per day for the first 10 days, US$18 daily for the next 10 days and US$24 daily thereafter. By January 2015, the total demurrage claim had reached over US$1 million, or approximately 10 times the value of the containers.

The English High Court held that the parties intended demurrage to start to run as soon as "free time" ran out. Cottonex was in breach of contract from that time. It did not matter that no one had taken delivery of the cargo. The Court determined the purpose of the clause was to quantify the damages payable for the breach of contract, namely the Merchant's failure to return a container to the Carrier within the agreed period of "free time".

Unsurprisingly, Cottonex argued that the Carrier had failed to take steps to mitigate its loss by unpacking the goods and retrieving the containers, or if necessary, buying replacement containers.

The Court held that because the parties had agreed specific amounts payable by the Shipper as damages for its breach of the contract, the mitigation principle did not apply and demurrage could accrue. Any argument that demurrage ceased to be payable after a specific period of time must however be founded upon some legal principle capable of bringing the parties contractual obligations to an end.

Does detention continue indefinitely?

In MSC v Cottonex, Cottonex argued that its inability or failure to collect the containers amounted to a repudiation of the contract of carriage, which brought any obligation to pay demurrage charges to an end.

The Court agreed, finding that title in the cotton had passed to the consignee so that Cottonex had no right to take delivery. Nor could Cottonex have compelled the Consignee to take delivery. At that stage, Cottonex was wholly and finally disabled from further performance of the contact. The court determined that by September 2011 the delay in collecting the goods had become so prolonged as to "frustrate the commercial purpose of the venture". Cottonex's liability for demurrage continued only until then.

"Legitimate interest" principle

In response to a repudiatory breach, an innocent party may choose either to terminate the contract (from which point the parties are released from their obligations) and seek damages, or maintain the contract. The Court confirmed that this choice is constrained to the extent that the innocent party must have a "legitimate interest" in maintaining the contract.

Had MSC elected to terminate, Cottonex would have been relieved of its obligations under the contract, including the obligation to pay ongoing container demurrage, and would have been liable to pay damages (the calculation of which would have been subject to the mitigation principle).

Ordinarily, where the carrier has control over its containers, it could exercise its rights to unpack the containers and re-take possession of them. This case was unusual as the Bangladesh customs authorities' actions did not allow that to occur. Once it became clear that there was no realistic prospect that Cottonex could collect the goods and return the containers, MSC no longer had any reason to keep the contracts in force other than to continue to claim demurrage. The carrier's election was entirely unreasonable, as it was not invoking the demurrage clause for a proper purpose, but rather to "seek to generate an unending stream of free income".

The Court noted that it would be proper for a carrier to keep the contract in force and claim demurrage even after repudiation by the Merchant, provided there was some basis for supposing that the Carrier's inability to use the containers was causing it to suffer ongoing loss. In the circumstances of this case where the customs authorities had refused to allow the containers to be released (a matter outside Cottonex's control) the Court inferred that a reasonable carrier would have acquired replacement containers.

Is an unlimited demurrage clause a penalty?

The Court also considered the separate question of whether MSC's container demurrage provision amounted to an unenforceable penalty. Hon Leggatt J found that a provision which allows demurrage to be recovered indefinitely even when no reasonable Carrier would be suffering a loss, goes outside compensation, and he would hold such a clause unenforceable as a penalty.


If the decision in MSC v Cottonex is followed in Australia, it seems that where circumstances prevent a merchant from returning containers, or the delay is such that the contract of carriage has been repudiated, the carrier will not be permitted to keep the contract alive and recover ongoing demurrage unless it has a "legitimate interest" in doing so. A carrier in that situation is unlikely to have the required legitimate interest unless it can show that it continued to suffer actual loss and damage that could not be avoided by taking repossession of containers or purchasing replacements.

Considering the evolving judicial position in Australia on the question of penalties, container detention charges may once again be closely scrutinised.

Australian courts must also consider the High Court's distinction between security for performance of an obligation and a fee charged for the provision of further services or accommodation. As this distinction is difficult to apply in the specific context of container detention charges, MSC v Cottonex could provide useful guidance to the industry.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions