Canada: Case Comment: T A & K Enterprises Inc. v. Suncor Energy Products Inc. and Suncor Energy Inc.

Last Updated: December 6 2011
Article by Sarah J. Armstrong and Zohaib I. Maladwala

The recent decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal in T A & K Enterprises Inc. v. Suncor Energy Products Inc. and Suncor Energy Inc. will be viewed positively by defendants in class actions, and particularly defendant franchisors, in light of a recent spate of class actions against franchisors in Ontario regarding franchise disclosure requirements. In T A & K, the Ontario Court of Appeal unanimously upheld the lower court decision of Justice Perell dismissing the plaintiff's summary judgment motion on behalf of the proposed class and granting summary judgment in favour of the defendant franchisor. The proposed class action against Suncor Energy Products Inc. and Suncor Energy Inc. (collectively "Suncor") was one of a number of recent franchise class actions brought against an array of franchisors regarding the disclosure requirements under Ontario's Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise Disclosure), 2000, S.O. 2000, c.3 (the "Wishart Act").


The Suncor decision is significant for a number of reasons:

  1. in the franchise law and franchise class actions context, the decision provides clarity on the exemptions to disclosure requirements listed in the Wishart Act;
  2. the Ontario Court of Appeal has now confirmed that royalties and service/imaging fees will most likely not be considered a "franchise fee" under the Wishart Act; and
  3. the decision is also noteworthy because of its interpretation of the revised summary judgment rule in the 2010 amendments to the Rules of Civil Procedure. Although we continue to wait for the Court of Appeal to deliver rulings directly interpreting the revised summary judgment rule, the Suncor decision suggests that courts in Ontario may be more willing to consider summary judgment motions in class actions in which the central issue is one of contractual or statutory interpretation, there is an adequate evidentiary record and there are no serious issues surrounding credibility.


The putative representative plaintiff, T A & K Enterprises ("TAK") entered into a series of one-year franchise agreements with Suncor to operate a gas station under the Sunoco banner.  The most recent of TAK's franchise agreements covered the period between November 15, 2008 and November 14, 2009.  TAK and the other members of the proposed class did not pay Suncor a fee to become a Sunoco franchise, but were required to pay royalties to Suncor, as well as additional fees for imaging and training. Suncor did not deliver a disclosure document to TAK or any of the proposed class members prior to the signing of their franchise agreements.

In the summer of 2009, a few months before the expiry of its 08/09 franchise agreements, Suncor merged with Petro Canada. To ensure that the merger did not run afoul of Canada's competition laws, the Commissioner of Competition required the newly amalgamated corporation to divest 194 retail gas stations in Ontario. Consequently, in October 2009, Suncor announced that it would not offer its current franchisees new one-year agreements when the 08/09 agreements expired in November 2009, and instead would extend the franchise agreements on a month-to-month basis following the end of their respective terms. In January 2010, Suncor delivered termination notices to approximately 125 franchisees, including TAK, advising them that their franchise agreements would terminate in seven months time. After receiving the termination notice, TAK sent Suncor a notice of rescission and served notice of the proposed class action.

Disclosure Requirements under the Wishart Act

Section 5 of the Wishart Act requires that all franchisors deliver a disclosure document to a prospective franchisee not less than 14 days before the earlier of (i) the signing of the franchise agreement or other agreement related to the franchise; or (ii) the payment of any consideration by or on behalf of the prospective franchise to the franchisor or franchisor's associate relating to the franchise. However, the section also provides for exemptions from the requirement to deliver a disclosure document in specific circumstances. One of the exemptions, central in this case, is if "the franchise agreement is not valid for longer than one year and does not involve the payment of a non-refundable franchise fee". However, the Wishart Act does not define the terms "valid" or "franchise fee".

If a franchisor does not meet one of the listed exemptions in section 5 and fails to provide a disclosure document to a franchisee, section 6(2) of the Wishart Act allows the franchisee to rescind the franchise agreement without penalty or obligation within two years of entering into the agreement. Upon such a rescission, the franchisor is obligated to make payments to the franchisee to compensate it for any expenses and losses that the franchisee incurred as a consequence of setting up the franchise. Under section 7 of the Wishart Act, the franchisee also maintains a right of action for damages against the franchisor, its broker, agent and/or associate if a disclosure document is not provided.

The Parties' Positions

In an attempt to obtain a swift result, both sides moved for summary judgment under the revised summary judgment rule in the 2010 amendments to the Rules of Civil Procedure.

TAK sought a summary declaration that Suncor breached its obligations under section 5 of the Wishart Act, by failing to deliver a disclosure document to each of its franchisees prior to the signing of their most recent franchise agreements. Accordingly, on behalf of the Sunoco franchisees, TAK sought to obtain the option to rescind their franchise agreement with Suncor and claim up to $200 million in damages.

TAK submitted that certain isolated and recurring fees paid to Suncor by its franchisees, including royalties, customer service dues, fees for store imaging and training program fees, constitute a "franchise fee" under the Wishart Act. TAK also argued that the agreement was "valid" for longer than one-year by virtue of the fact that the franchise agreement was signed a few days before it actually came into force on November 15, 2008 and continued until November 14, 2009. Alternatively, TAK argued that the franchise agreement was "valid" for longer than one-year after its month-to-month extension in October 2009. In the further alternative, TAK also relied on a specific term of the franchise agreement, which permitted it to continue operating as a Sunoco franchise on a month-month basis if TAK remained in possession of the store after expiry of the franchise agreement, as proof that the agreement was "valid" for longer than one-year.

Suncor moved to have the action dismissed in its entirety, on the grounds that a disclosure document was not required. Suncor contended that its franchise agreement with TAK and the other class members fell under the exemption listed in section 5(7)(g)(ii), which exempts a franchisor from providing a disclosure document if the franchise agreement is not "valid" for more than one year and does not involve the payment of a non-refundable franchise fee. Suncor also relied on a second exemption under the Wishart Act which exempted a franchisor from providing a disclosure document where there was a renewal or extension of a franchise agreement with no interruption in the operation of the franchisee's business and no material change since the previous franchise agreement.

The Motions Judge's Decision

At the outset, Justice Perell held that "there are no genuine issues that require a trial" and accepted both parties' submission that he, as a motions judge, was "in as good a position as a trial judge to decide this matter."

Justice Perell then went on to consider the exemptions listed under section 5(7) of the Wishart Act.  With respect to the definition of "franchise fee", Justice Perell rejected TAK's submission that any payment from a franchisee to franchisor, including dues, fees and royalties is a "franchise fee" under the Act. He held that "a franchise fee means a direct or indirect payment to obtain the right to purchase a franchise, to operate a franchised business, or to become a franchisee in a franchise chain." With this definition in mind, Justice Perell found that Suncor's franchise agreement did not impose a non-refundable franchise fee upon its franchisees, and consequently the first element of the exemption in section 5(7)(g)(ii) of the Wishart Act was met.

Justice Perell also rejected TAK's arguments on the term of its franchise agreement. The motions' judge held that the duration of an agreement was the defined term within which the rights and obligations of the parties were operational. Although a party is not precluded from bringing an action for anticipatory breach prior to the commencement of the actual term of an agreement, the enforceable and operational rights and obligations in a franchise agreement only exist for the duration of its term, which in Suncor's case was November 15, 2008 to November 14, 2009. Consequently the agreement was not "valid" for longer than one year according to Justice Perell.

Justice Perell also rejected TAK's alternative arguments that Suncor's option and decision to extend the franchise agreement on a month-to-month basis precluded it from relying on the s.5(7)(g)(ii) exemption. As Suncor was not obligated to extend or offer a new franchise agreement to TAK at the time the agreement was entered into, Justice Perell found that TAK could not rely on events or circumstances that occurred after the signing of the agreement to argue that Suncor was now unable to rely on the s.5(7)(g)(ii) exemption. To accept such an argument would practically render the s.5(7)(g)(ii) exemption ineffective, as the possibility of a future extension of the franchise agreement by the franchisor always exists. 

The Court of Appeal Decision

The Court of Appeal unanimously adopted Justice Perell's findings with regards to the exemption listed in s.5(7)(g)(ii) and dismissed TAK's appeal.

The Court accepted that the duration of the franchise agreement was twelve months even though it had been executed before the start of its term. The Court of Appeal also rejected TAK's suggestion that the franchise agreement remained 'valid' for longer than one-year because the indemnity and confidentiality provisions in the agreement survived the termination or expiration of the agreement. The relevant consideration was the length of the enforceable grant of a franchise, not the fact that other provisions in the agreement survived for longer. The Court unanimously rejected TAK's argument that the possibility of an extension at the time the agreement was entered into extends the duration of the agreement, holding that "a section that merely creates the possibility of a month-to-month tenancy after the [franchise agreement] expires cannot be taken to extend it." The Court added that the October 2009 letter extending the franchise agreements on a monthly basis created new monthly agreements following the expiry of the franchise agreement, and did not extend the prior agreement.

Finally, the court expressly rejected TAK's assertion that royalties constitute franchise fees. Instead, the court agreed with Justice Perell and held that "a franchise fee is in the nature of a fee paid for the right to become a franchisee. It does not include royalties or payments for goods and services."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions