On March 1, 2013, the Canadian Government introduced Bill C-56, Combating Counterfeit Products Act.  This Bill, which is being promoted by the Government as a means of reducing the presence of, and trade in, counterfeit goods in Canada, also introduces wide sweeping amendments to the Trade-marks Act.

The changes proposed to the Trade-marks Act are stated to be intended to foster innovation and creativity by simplifying the registration process for trade-mark owners, providing protection for non-traditional marks and introducing new civil and criminal remedies for counterfeiting and related activities supplemented by powers of search, seizure, detention and forfeiture of offending goods. However, many of the amendments proposed in this Bill appear to be housekeeping matters not directly related to combating counterfeit activities.

The principal highlights of the Bill which will be of interest to trade-mark owners include:

  • the modernization of certain definitions and the relaxation of formal filing requirements to permit or facilitate registration of non-traditional trade-marks including scents, tastes, textures, holograms, three dimensional shapes and modes of packaging goods. Also among the non-traditional marks, Bill C-56 expressly recognizes the registrability of sound marks, which the Canadian Trade-marks Office began to accept for registration  last year;

  • the ability to file applications to register certification marks on a proposed use basis;

  • the expansion of the exclusive rights of owners of registered trade-marks to provide a civil cause of action for the unauthorized manufacture, possession, importation, exportation or attempted exportation of goods which bear a trade-mark identical to or confusing with a trade-mark registered for such goods;

  • amendments to the procedures applicable to trade-mark oppositions to permit the Registrar to strike all or part of a statement of opposition and to simplify the form of a counterstatement filed in response to an opposition;

  • the ability to divide applications to facilitate the issuance of an application to registration for limited goods or services that were within the scope of the specification at the date of advertisement and later merge registrations that stemmed from the same original application;

  • a provision conferring upon the Registrar the power to correct certain errors on the register within six months from the date on which the entry was made;

  • the introduction of new criminal offences punishable by fines or imprisonment for the manufacture, sale, importation or export of counterfeit goods or labels or packaging intended to be use in association with the sale, distribution or advertising of counterfeit goods; and

  • the introduction of a new procedure which will permit the owner of a registered trade-mark to file a request with the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness for assistance in pursuing remedies to restrain the importation or export of certain counterfeit goods.  As a corollary, the Bill provides enhanced powers to customs officers to detain goods suspected of being counterfeit and to the courts to deal with and grant relief in connection with the seizure and detention of such goods. 

Further information about the provisions of Bill C-56 as they relate specifically to counterfeit goods can be found in the Osler Update “Government Introduces Proposed Anti-Counterfeiting Legislation to Strengthen Rights of Copyright and Trade-mark Owners ”.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

AUTHOR(S)
Donna White
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
Barry Fong
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Intellectual Property from Canada
Moral Right To Authorship Tied To Copyright
Oyen Wiggs Green & Mutala LLP
The Federal Court of Appeal has upheld a finding that the Royal Canadian Legion did not infringe an author's moral rights by selling poppy patterned...
Federal Court Emphasizes Importance Of Meeting Legal Standards Even In Unopposed Cases
Oyen Wiggs Green & Mutala LLP
In McDowell v. A Drip of Honey, 2024 FC 453, the Plaintiff, Heather Ruth McDowell, brought an ex parte motion in writing seeking default judgment against the Defendant, A Drip of Honey.
Understanding The Legal Implications Of Patent Expiry In Canada
MLT Aikins LLP
The expiration of a patent is a significant event in the lifecycle of intellectual property (IP) rights.
Angelcare And Playtex Seal Another Win Against Patent Infringer Munchkin
Smart & Biggar
On August 17, 2023, the Federal Court issued its decision in Angelcare Canada Inc. et al. v Munchkin Inc. et al. (2023 FC 1111) regarding the Plaintiffs' entitlement to certain remedies for patent infringement.
"Poppy Puppy" Appeal Dismissed – Where Useful Articles Are Involved, The "Right To Attribution" May Not Be
Bereskin & Parr LLP
The Canadian Copyright Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42 provides authors with two types of moral rights: integrity and attribution (the right to be associated with the work or to remain anonymous).
Case Review 2023: Patent Motions
Seastone IP
In 2023, the Federal Court of Canada released more patent motion decisions than motion decisions in all other IP rights combined...