Canada: Insolvency And Environmental Law Collide: Supreme Court Of Canada Rules In Favour Of Alberta Energy Regulator In Redwater Decision

Last Updated: February 11 2019
Article by Tamara Farber and Sherry A. Kettle

The Supreme Court of Canada ("SCC") has released its decision in Orphan Well Association v. Grant Thornton Limited (2019 SCC 5) regarding the bankruptcy of Redwater Energy Corporation, and the strategy of Redwater's trustees in bankruptcy to try to sell off productive assets of the company to pay creditors, while disclaiming environmentally challenged assets and leaving them to the industry funded Orphan Well Association and potentially the Government of Alberta to address.

Not so fast, says the Supreme Court of Canada! There are end-of-life remedial obligations associated with the bankrupt's non-productive wells that have to be addressed. This isn't a battle of federal versus provincial legislation and paramountcy; it's a prioritization of the use of the bankrupt's assets for compliance with its regulatory obligations to clean up under the terms of its licenses.

"Insolvency professionals are bound by and must comply with valid provincial laws during a bankruptcy" says the SCC in its decision.

The story began when Grant Thornton ("GT") was appointed as receiver and trustee over the assets and liabilities of Redwater Energy Corporation ("Redwater") under Canada's Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act ("BIA") in 2015. Redwater was a publicly traded oil and gas company, which held licenses under the jurisdiction of the Alberta Energy Regulator ("AER") for various properties. Under the applicable provincial legislation, a receiver/trustee is a "licensee" who can operate the licensed assets of the debtor. GT's strategy was to disclaim non-producing wells – those that had no economic value and significant environmental liabilities – using the BIA to effectively pick and choose the prime assets to maximize recovery for Redwater's creditors. GT took the position that the end-of-life abandonment and reclamation obligations of Redwater were unsecured claims which could not take priority over the claims of secured creditors.

The AER, on the other hand, took the position that the remaining value of the bankrupt estate should be applied to satisfy the abandonment and reclamation obligations associated with the estate's licensed assets before any distribution to creditors. AER and the Orphan Well Association brought proceedings to compel GT, as trustee under the remedial orders in effect for each well, to comply with proper abandonment and remedial obligations. AER reasoned, as a regulator, that it was not a creditor, that Redwater's environmental obligations associated with the non-performing wells were not "claims provable in bankruptcy", and that its environmental obligations were therefore unaffected by the bankruptcy proceedings. When GT took over as receiver and trustee in bankruptcy, argued AER, it was obliged to discharge the licensee's obligations prior to distributing funds to Redwater's creditors. When GT purported to disclaim the non-performing assets, AER issued remedial orders for those disclaimed assets. GT objected.

At its first judicial hurdle before the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench (Re Redwater Energy Corporation, 2016 ABQB 278 (CanLII)), GT succeeded. The Court agreed with GT that it could disclaim un-economic assets of the bankrupt and sell off productive assets to satisfy the claims of Redwater's creditors under the priority scheme in the BIA. The Court found that claims of secured creditors had priority over the environmental obligations created under provincial statutes. The Court held that the doctrine of paramountcy was engaged. The provincial regulator's approach conflicted with section 14.06(4) of the BIA by (a) imposing obligations of a licensee on the trustee in respect to the disclaimed assets and (b) interfering with the priority scheme in the federal BIA by giving the regulator a super priority, to which it was not entitled, ahead of secured creditors. As such, the provincial environmental legislation was constitutionally inoperative to the extent of the conflict. The trustee was entitled to disclaim the unproductive assets pursuant to section 14.06(4) of the BIA and was not subject to any obligations in relation to the disclaimed assets.

The regulators appealed but, again, GT succeeded (Orphan Well Association v. Grant Thornton Limited, 2017 ABCA 124 (CanLII)). Relying on the history of changes to the BIA which specifically limited trustee liability, and relying upon the Supreme Court of Canada's 2012 decision in Newfoundland and Labrador v. AbitibiBowater Inc. (2012 SCC 67) ("Abitibi"), environmental claims are provable in bankruptcy if sufficiently expressed in monetary terms, (or if they will "ripen into a financial liability" considering the factors set out in Abitibi) and are still subject to the priorities established under the BIA for priority payment to secured creditors. Environmental obligations of the nature in Redwater did not create a super priority. The regulators' claim was able to be expressed in monetary terms because AER conceded that the cost of compliance with its orders would decrease the amount recoverable by the creditors. The Alberta Court of Appeal held that AER's objective was to disrupt the priority scheme for payments under the BIA. Although there was a lengthy dissenting opinion, AER and Orphan Well did not prevail.

If at first, (or second) you don't succeed.....

AER and the Orphan Well Association appealed to the SCC, which overturned the Court of Appeal’s decision. The SCC ruled that the trustee had license obligations while it managed the estate of the bankrupt. When it assumed control of the licensed assets, the regulatory obligations that attached to those licenses could not be ignored. There was no conflict between section 14.06 of the BIA and the relevant provincial legislation because section 14.06 of the BIA only resulted in the trustee not being personally liable for failing to comply with certain environmental orders while the liability of the bankrupt estate continued. Further, AER was not asserting a claim "provable in bankruptcy" and thus there was no conflict between the priority scheme in the BIA and the provincial environmental legislation. The SCC clarified and applied the test outlined in Abitibi for determining whether a regulatory obligation in the circumstances of each case amounts to a claim provable in bankruptcy: (1) there must be a debt, liability or obligation to a creditor; (2) the debt, liability or obligation must be incurred before bankruptcy; and (3) it must be possible to attach a monetary value to the debt, liability or obligation. It was not disputed that the second part of the test was met. With respect to the first part of the test, the majority of the SCC clarified that Abitibi does not stand for the proposition that a regulator who exercises its enforcement powers is always a creditor. In exerting its power to enforce a public duty, it was not a creditor. The regulator would not gain anything financially from the remedial orders. Rather, it was the public who would benefit from the orders in requiring the end-of-life environmental obligations be satisfied. Unlike in Abitibi, there was no apparent attempt by the regulator to recover a debt. Wagner C.J., on behalf of the majority went on to state that even if the regulator was a creditor, the third part of the Abitibi test was not met because it was not sufficiently certain that the regulator would perform the abandonments and make a claim for reimbursement.

"Insolvency professionals are bound by and must comply with valid provincial laws during a bankruptcy", said the SCC. It drew a distinction between the liability of the trustee personally, and the liability of the bankrupt's estate. The latter is unaffected by the BIA where the trustee disclaims assets. The SCC reiterated the test in Abitibi as applicable, and held that not all environmental obligations enforced by a regulator will be a "claim provable in bankruptcy" (despite this common interpretation post Abitibi). Because the regulator here acted in the public interest in issuing the remedial orders, and did not stand to benefit financially, it was not a creditor.

What to make of all of this? A few "tips" for trustees and creditors:

Trustees / insolvency professionals: Tread lightly. Insolvency professionals need to be mindful of personal liability, but not lose sight of a bankrupt estate's regulatory obligations.

Secured Creditors: The Supreme Court has given every regulator a roadmap to potentially overriding the BIA. A regulator can stand up and say it is not going to benefit financially, and is acting in the interests of the public. If the bright line under the Abitibi test is whether the environmental duty will "ripen into a financial liability", that is, it must be sufficiently certain that the contingency will come to pass that the regulator will actually incur the costs and undertake the remedial obligation, a regulator can actively take steps to obscure its regulatory enforcement path, or even block it. By doing so, it would take itself outside of the creditor definition, and ahead of secured creditors.

Secured creditors usually require debtors to provide financial and environmental liability disclosure at the beginning of a relationship, but are less diligent about updates. Environmental liabilities of a debtor should be investigated fully, financial reporting and disclosure of changes in environmental liabilities should be more frequent, and more detailed. Environmental covenants in loan documentation should be secured with a broader base of collateral from the debtor and related entities, together with guarantees. When solvency issues arise, secured creditors should consider whether some engagement with the regulator is warranted, although this carries some potential risk.

Secured creditors should engage in discussions with the debtor, environmental and insolvency professionals as quickly as possible to protect their investment in collateral. Secured creditors will need to consider whether it makes financial sense to commence an insolvency process as there is a risk that there will be no distribution to creditors after satisfying environmental obligations.

While some may attempt to limit the application of the Redwater decision in other cases, the scope and use of remedial powers of regulators like AER seems to be growing. If a solvency issue arises and there are ongoing regulatory obligations, creative strategies will have to be brought to the table. As noted by the SCC, the only issue on which the parties could agree was that the interpretation of section 14.06 of the BIA was not at all clear. What is clear is that the SCC has invited Parliament to re-examine this issue.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions