Canada: Supreme Court Of Canada Endorses The Federal Court Of Appeal's Denial Of GST/HST New Housing Rebate Where A Bare Trustee Takes Title – Application For Leave To Appeal Denied: Cheema v The Queen, 2019 Canlii 10518

Last Updated: March 14 2019
Article by David Rotfleisch

Introduction - The Queen v Cheema

On February 14, 2019, the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed the taxpayer's application for leave (permission) to appeal the Federal Court of Appeal's split decision in The Queen v Cheema (2018 FCA 45). In that case, a majority of the Federal Court of Appeal held that a new-home purchaser cannot claim the GST/HST New Housing Rebate if a co-signer of the purchase agreement doesn't also occupy the home—even if the co-signer acted as a bare trustee for the purchaser's benefit. The majority Federal Court of Appeal's decision stood in sharp contrast to the treatment of bare trusts in Canadian tax law, which generally ignores such a trust for tax purposes. By refusing to hear the taxpayer's appeal, the Supreme Court of Canada has thereby entrenched a move away from general tax principles and bare trusts.

After articulating both the requirements of the GST/HST New Housing Rebate and the nature of a bare trust, this article explores the development of the Cheema case from its start in the Tax Court of Canada to its end at the doorstep of the Supreme Court of Canada.

Sections 256.1 & 254(2) of the Excise Tax Act: The GST/HST New Housing Rebate

Section 256.1 of Canada's Excise Tax Act (along with the relevant provincial regulation) permits a new housing rebate. In Ontario, the rebate is an amount of up to $24,000 for a residential complex, and the availability of the Ontario rebate doesn't depend on the value of the home. The federal rebate, however, is available only if the fair market value of the newly built or substantially renovated home is $450,000 or less.

Subsection 254(2) of the Excise Tax Act sets out the conditions for receiving the GST/HST New Housing Rebate. All of these conditions must be satisfied to receive the new housing rebate:

  • The home or condo builder sells the property to an individual purchaser (i.e., the purchaser can't be a corporation or trust).
  • The purchaser buys the home or condo for use as his or her "primary place of residence" (or the primary place of residence of his or her relative or spouse). The timing of the intention is also relevant—in particular, the purchaser's intention to use the home or condo as a primary place of residence must exist "at the time the [purchaser] becomes liable or assumes liability under an agreement of purchase and sale."
  • The purchaser "has paid all tax [i.e., GST/HST] payable" for purchasing the new home or condo.
  • Ownership of the home or condo is transferred to the purchaser after the home or condo's construction or substantial renovation.
  • The purchaser (or his or her relative or spouse) was the first individual to occupy the home or condo as a place of residence after its construction or substantial renovation. And if there is more than one purchaser, all of them as a group must satisfy the occupancy requirement (subsection 262(3) of the Excise Tax Act).

The Bare Trust & Its Canadian Tax Treatment

The trust concept finds its roots in equity, a body of law developed in the English Court of Chancery and adopted by Canadian courts. Equity distinguishes legal ownership from beneficial ownership. A person legally owns a property if his or her name is on title, yet the beneficial owner is "the real owner of property even though it is in someone else's name." (Csak v Aumon, [1990] 69 DLR (4th) 567 (Ont. HCJ), at p. 570.)

A trust is a relationship between a trustee, a beneficiary, and a property. And it depends on the distinction between beneficial and legal ownership: the trustee legally owns the property; the beneficiary (unsurprisingly) beneficially owns the property.

Typically, the trust's creator (a.k.a. the settlor) will burden the trustee with duties to maintain or manage the trust property in the beneficiary's favour. For instance, the settlor might require that the trustee manage a large sum of money for a child or disabled beneficiary.

A bare trust, however, is a trust where the trustee legally owns a property with the sole duty of conveying title to the beneficiary upon demand. In other words, the difference between a bare trust and an ordinary trust lies in the trustee's power or discretion:

  • The distinguishing characteristic of the bare trust is that the trustee has no independent powers, discretions or responsibilities. His only responsibility is to carry out the instructions of his principals—the beneficiaries. If he does not have to accept instructions, if he has any significant independent powers or responsibilities, he is not a bare trustee. (Trident Holdings Ltd. v Danand Investments Ltd., 64 OR (2nd) 65 (Ont. CA)).

Canada's tax laws generally look through a bare trust. Canadian tax courts treat a bare trust as akin to an agency relationship. In an agency relationship, the agent deals with property on its principal's behalf. Canada's tax laws ignore the agent and treat the principal as having dealt directly with the property. In the same way, Canada's tax laws ignore the bare trustee and treat the beneficiary as having dealt directly with the trust property.

And, until the Federal Court of Appeal's decision in Cheema, courts had faithfully ignored the legal interests of a bare trustee when determining the tax implications of a transaction. For instance, in De Mond Jr. v The Queen, [1999] 4 CTC 2007, Justice Lamarre (as she then was) explained that "[t]he existence of a bare trust will be disregarded for income tax purposes where the bare trustee holds property as a mere agent or for the beneficial owner."

Moreover, this treatment wasn't specific to Canadian income tax. It also applied in cases involving GST/HST (Harmonized Sales Tax and Goods and Services Tax). That is, courts had also ignored bare trusts when applying the provisions of the Excise Tax Act: (see, e.g.: S.E.R. Contracting Ltd. v The Queen, 2006 TCC 6 at para 12; City of Edmonton v The Queen, 2015 TCC 172 at para 56.)

Granted, neither the Income Tax Act nor the Excise Tax Act define a "bare trust." But subsection 104(1) of the Income Tax Act says that "a trust is deemed not to include an arrangement under which the trust can reasonably be considered to act as agent for all beneficiaries under the trust." Commentators have interpreted this clause as Parliament's way of confirming that the Income Tax Act's trust provisions don't apply to a bare trust.

The Dilemma of Mohammad N. Cheema

Mr. Mohammad N. Cheema wished to purchase a newly built residential property. He couldn't, however, secure a mortgage by himself. So, Mr. Cheema asked his buddy, Dr. Akbari, for help.

So, to assist Cheema get a mortgage, Dr. Akbari signed the agreement of purchase and sale as a purchaser—along with Cheema and his spouse. The Cheema and Akbari also agreed that Akbari wouldn't have any substantive interest in the property, wouldn't pay any of the purchase price or expenses, and wouldn't live in the house.

On closing, Cheema and his spouse acquired an undivided 99% interest in the property; Akbari acquired a 1% interest. The parties also signed a bare-trust agreement documenting the nature of their relationship. The agreement stated that

  • Cheema and his spouse were the beneficial owners of the property,
  • Akbari held his 1% interest in trust for the beneficial owners, and
  • Akbari would convey his interest on demand.

The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) denied Cheema's GST/HST New Housing Rebate on the basis that Akbari neither acquired the property as his primary residence nor occupied the residence.

Cheema appealed the CRA's reassessment to the Tax Court of Canada.

The dispute—in both the Tax Court of Canada and the Federal Court of Appeal—turned on a single issue:

  • Does an individual who acquires title as bare trustee also need to satisfy the Excise Tax Act's conditions to receive the GST/HST New Housing Rebate?

In other words, does a person who signs the agreement of purchase and sale in the capacity of a bare trustee also need to live in the property?

The Tax Court's Decision: Cheema v Her Majesty the Queen, 2016 TCC 251

Appearing before the Tax Court of Canada, Cheema argued that Akbari wasn't subject to the conditions set out in subsection 254(2) of the Excise Tax Act because Akbari was a bare trustee. That is, to receive the GST/HST New Housing Rebate, Cheema and his spouse were the only ones required to live in the property and sign the purchase agreement with that intention.

The Crown didn't dispute the fact that Cheema and his spouse satisfied the rebate conditions. But the Crown contended that Akbari also needed to satisfy those conditions. The Crown alleged that, because he signed the agreement of purchase and sale, Akbari was required under the Excise Tax Act to occupy the property. Since Akbari didn't occupy the property, the rebate is unavailable.

The Tax Court of Canada allowed Cheema's appeal and permitted the GST/HST New Housing Rebate. Drawing from the traditional tax treatment of bare trusts, the court reasoned that a bare trustee need not meet the conditions set out in subsection 254(2) of the Excise Tax Act. In addition, the court held that subsection 262(3), which requires each of multiple purchasers to qualify for the rebate, does not bring a bare trustee into the scope of subsection 254(2). The court summarized the law as follows: For tax purposes, a bare trust is considered a non-entity in the sense that a beneficiary as principal, is considered to deal directly with property through the trustee as agent or nominee (ibid, at para 54). Sensing the problems that the Tax Court's decision may pose for the Canada Revenue Agency, the Crown appealed the court's decision to the Federal Court of Appeal.

The Federal Court of Appeal's Decision: Her Majesty the Queen v Cheema, 2018 FCA 45

A split Federal Court of Appeal overturned the Tax Court of Canada's decision and decided that a taxpayer couldn't qualify for the GST/HST New Housing Rebate unless everyone who signed the purchase agreement occupied the home as a primary place of residence. Stratas J.A. delivered the majority opinion; Nadon J.A. concurred. Webb J.A., however, produced a forceful dissent.

The majority reasoned that the Tax Court erred by relying on the bare-trust agreement when rendering its decision. According to the majority Federal Court of Appeal, subsection 254(2) of the Excise Tax Act doesn't distinguish between beneficial and legal ownership; it requires that each individual who assumes legal liability to the builder under the purchase agreement to satisfy the rebate conditions.

In his robust dissent, however, Webb J.A. concluded that Akbari needn't satisfy the rebate conditions subsection 254(2) of the Excise Tax Act. Webb J.A. observed that the GST/HST New Housing Rebate was presumably meant to aid the beneficial owner's purchase of a newly built home. After all, the beneficial owner is generally the person who pays the GST/HST on the purchase. Also, the Excise Tax Act's rebate scheme notably doesn't contemplate the removal of a purchaser from the purchase agreement. This void, Webb J.A. suggested, indicates that the rebate conditions focused on the individual who acquired beneficial ownership—not merely the one who assumed liability under the purchase agreement. Finally, Webb J.A. predicted that the majority's judgement may lead to an unintended, perverse investment opportunity (ibid at para 62):

  • There may also be situations where the Minister will want to determine whether the supply by way of sale was made to the person who is the beneficial owner. Assume that two individuals want to buy a condo – one as an investment (the investor) and the other as a place to live (the occupant). Assume that the investor is not a relation of the occupant for the purposes of section 254 of the ETA. Assume that the occupant is the only person who signs the agreement of purchase and sale as a purchaser and is the only person shown on the deed as a grantee. The occupant collects one-half of the amount of the purchase price from the investor and pays the full purchase price to the builder. The occupant signs a declaration of bare trust in favour of the investor, declaring that a fifty interest [sic] in the property is being held for the investor. The occupant occupies the condo as their primary place of residence. It would seem to me that the Minister would want to argue that transfer of legal title by the builder to the occupant would not be sufficient to make the occupant the only particular individual for the purposes of paragraph 254(2)(a) of the ETA.

Despite Webb J.A.'s cogent reasons, the majority Federal Court of Appeal decided against Cheema and held that a taxpayer couldn't receive the GST/HST New Housing Rebate if an individual signed the purchase agreement as a bare trustee yet failed to satisfy the rebate conditions under section 254 of the Excise Tax Act.

The Failed Run for the Supreme Court of Canada

On April 4, 2018, Cheema applied to the Supreme Court of Canada for leave to appeal the decision of the Federal Court of Appeal. On February 14, 2019, the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed the taxpayer's application for leave to appeal Federal Court of Appeal's split decision (2019 CanLII 10518; Docket: 38090).

As a result, Canada's tax law is now set: you cannot qualify for the GST/HST New Housing Rebate unless everyone who signed the purchase agreement occupied the home as a primary place of residence—even if one of those individuals acquired title in the capacity as a bare trustee.

Commentary – Bare Trusts and the GST/HST New Housing Rebate

As Webb J.A.'s dissent hinted, the holding of the Federal Court of Appeal opens up an investment opportunity involving the GST/HST New Housing Rebate that Parliament presumably did not intend.

Moreover, the Federal Court of Appeal's decision opens additional issues. First, Cheema involved a relationship between the bare trustee, Akbari, and the beneficiary, Cheema, yet it's unclear whether the appellate court's reasoning in Cheema would or should apply to principal-agent relationships. Second, in Cheema, Mr. Cheema and Dr. Akbari both initially signed the agreement of purchase and sale. The dissent pointed out that the GST/HST rebate provisions don't provide a mechanism for recognizing who needs to qualify when a buyer's name is removed from the purchase agreement. And the majority court doesn't explain whether such a revision would render the GST/HST rebate unavailable for the remaining purchaser.

Tax Tips: Qualifying for the GST/HST New Housing Rebate

Cheema demonstrates that, if you need a guarantor to qualify for a mortgage on a property otherwise eligible for the GST/HST New Housing Rebate, your guarantor shouldn't sign the agreement of purchase and sale unless he or she will also satisfy the rebate criteria. If your intended guarantor doesn't meet the rebate conditions, you should keep the guarantor's name off title. Instead, your guarantor should only sign the mortgage agreement.

The Cheema case involved the GST/HST New Housing Rebate for purchasing a new home from a builder. But you can also receive the GST/HST New Housing Rebate for building a home on land that you own where the home will serve as your (or a relative's) primary place of residence. Similarly, the GST/HST New Housing Rebate is also available if you substantially renovate your primary place of residence. The maximum Ontario new-housing-rebate amount for an owner-built house differs depending on whether you paid HST when you purchased the land: If you paid HST, the maximum rebate is $24,000; if you didn't pay HST, the maximum rebate is $16,080.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Practice Guides
by Mondaq Advice Centres
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions