Cayman Islands: English Court Echoes Cayman Court’s Decision In Weavering Litigation

Last Updated: 9 August 2012
Article by Christopher Russell and Andrew Jackson

Anyone familiar with Cayman Islands mutual funds will be aware of the decision of the Cayman Islands Grand Court last year in Weavering Macro Fixed Income Fund Limited (In Liquidation) v. Stefan Peterson and Hans Ekstrom. It will be recalled that in Weavering the Fund was wound up following the discovery that it had been the victim of a fraud and had no assets, and that claims were brought by its official liquidators alleging that the directors had acted in breach of the duties they owed to the Fund to act in its interests, to exercise independent judgment, and to exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence. As Peterson and Ekstrom relied on a clause in the Fund's articles of association exonerating a director from liability for loss or damage caused to the Fund other than that arising through his own wilful neglect or default, the official liquidators had to prove that the directors were guilty of wilful neglect or default in order to succeed.

On the facts, the judge (Jones J) had no hesitation in holding that the directors of the Fund were guilty of wilful neglect or default, as they had intentionally failed to perform their duties to supervise their delegates (particularly the Fund's investment manager ("WCUK")) and to exercise independent judgment. They had subordinated themselves to the will of Magnus Peterson who, in addition to being Stefan's brother and Hans's step-son, was a director of WCUK and the author of the fraud. Peterson and Ekstrom had, according to the judge's findings, adopted a practice of signing whatever board minutes and documents Magnus put in front of them and saying what Magnus wanted them to say without giving those matters any or any proper consideration. Jones J also found that the directors had failed to properly consider the quarterly financial reports provided to them by the Fund's administrator, which, had they done so, would have informed them that WCUK was not complying with the Fund's investment restrictions and that Magnus was perpetrating a fraud on the Fund and its investors. In those circumstances, they could not be heard to say that they were simply doing their "incompetent best", which was what they needed to show in order to rely on the exemption clause in the Fund's articles.

The next episode in the saga was set in the English High Court. Entitled Weavering Capital (UK) Limited (In Liquidation) and Others v. Peterson and Others (in which judgment was handed down on 30 May 2012), this was an action brought by the liquidators of WCUK which comprised clawback claims against recipients of some of WCUK's assets and claims against WCUK's directors (Magnus Peterson, his wife Amanda and a Mr Chas Dabhia) for inter alia breaches of the fiduciary and statutory duties they owed to WCUK. If the action against the directors succeeded, WCUK's liquidators intended to admit (to an amount of US$450 million) a proof of debt the liquidators of the Fund had filed in WCUK's liquidation in respect of breaches by WCUK of the Investment Advisory Agreement (in particular failure to comply with its obligation to adhere to the Fund's investment restrictions), breaches of fiduciary duty, negligence, conspiracy and fraudulent/negligent misstatement in WCUK's purported performance of its duties.

As Magnus Peterson was the author of the fraud perpetrated on the Fund's investors, Proudman J had no difficulty in finding that he was liable for breach of the duties which he owed to WCUK as a director. The judge also found that Magnus effectively controlled WCUK. A greater degree of analysis was, however, devoted to the claims against the other two directors.

Amanda Peterson sought to resist the liquidators' claim on the bases that:

  1. she had a very limited and confined role at WCUK, having been involved only in the execution of exchange-trading as opposed to investment management strategy;
  2. she had acted reasonably in assuming that Magnus Peterson, Chas Dabhia and a senior employee were managing the Fund properly, in the absence of anything to alert her to the fraud; and
  3. she could not reasonably have done anything which would have led to any different result. All of these arguments were rejected: as a director, Amanda Peterson could not escape liability on any of these bases.

In relation to the first, the judge found that WCUK was a small firm in which all parties occasionally undertook the functions of the others and it was no answer to a claim in negligence against a director that Amanda only had a confined area of responsibility.

On the second point, the test was whether what Mrs Peterson did was that which a reasonable director of a hedge fund management company in her position, with her experience, actual knowledge and intelligence should have done, and whether she had acquired a sufficient knowledge of WCUK's business to discharge her duties. The directors of WCUK had accepted responsibility for the contents of the Fund's offering memorandum, Mrs Peterson had discussed and approved the Fund's entry into the interest rate swaps with her husband, she knew that her husband had a majority interest in the counterparty ("WCF") to the trades which the Fund was entering into, that WCF was ostensibly managed by WCUK but paid no fees for that service, that WCF had no external administrator and had no substantial assets of its own, and that WCUK was not conducting any trades on behalf of WCF for extended periods of time.

With regard to the question of causation, the judge held that the test was what a reasonable director would have done and found that, with the knowledge that Mrs Peterson actually possessed, she could not have reasonably approved the relevant trading in contravention of the Fund's offering memorandum nor could she have allowed that trading strategy to continue with a related party such as WCF. Amanda had in fact decided to subordinate herself to the will of her husband and blindly trusted that he was properly managing the Fund and would continue to do so, and that was no defence to the claims against her.

In relation to the liquidators' claims against Chas Dabhia (whose primary responsibility was to market the Fund to investors), Proudman J confirmed that it was no answer to a claim for a breach of his duties as a director of WCUK to say that he failed to apply his mind to the important question of who was the counterparty to the relevant trades. In the judge's opinion, he should have realised that "something was seriously amiss with the swaps and that the requirements of the OM were not being observed" and he "should have realised that the swaps were being concealed from the investors, he should have asked the identity of the counterparty ... and considered the issue of the 20% restriction and made inquiries as to how WCF could meet its obligations", but instead he participated in misrepresentations to the investors in inter alia the due diligence questionnaires. In the circumstances, Proudman J held that Mr Dabhia was in breach of his duties as a director as he failed to acquire a sufficient knowledge and understanding of WCUK's business and failed to satisfy himself as to the details and propriety of the relevant trades, and was liable in negligence for failing to act with reasonable care, skill and diligence and for negligently making false representations to investors. Importantly, the judge reached this conclusion notwithstanding that she had found as a fact that Mr Dabhia had only a limited understanding of what Magnus was doing and had followed his instructions unquestioningly, and that he did not realise (at least until a very late stage) that WCF was the counterparty to the trades the Fund had entered into.

The most important points for directors to take from Proudman J's decision in the WCUK case are that:

  1. a director does not escape liability for breach of his duties by relying on co-directors to properly perform their functions in circumstances where the director was wilfully blind to the fact that his co-directors were not properly performing their duties, or where he failed to acquire sufficient knowledge and understanding of his company's business so as to be able to appreciate when his co-directors were failing to perform their duties; and
  2. a director must exercise his own independent judgment and may not subordinate himself to the will of another.

The English decision echoes Jones J's forceful reminder in the Cayman proceedings that directors are inter alia duty-bound to exercise their own independent judgment, to properly supervise their delegates and to know the business which they are appointed to direct. The directors' appeal against Jones J's decision has been heard by the Cayman Islands Court of Appeal and judgment is awaited.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions