Cayman Islands: The Cayman Islands: Open For Business

Last Updated: 26 March 2018
Article by Paul Smith and Spencer Vickers

If there was any uncertainty that the Cayman Islands is a top jurisdiction of choice for complex litigation and restructuring matters, two cases in 2017 prove (beyond a reasonable doubt) that its Grand Court is not only able to take on the big cases, but it is willing to take a commercial approach to ensure justice is served.

In the matter of Ocean Rig UDW Inc (in provisional liquidation) (unreported, 18 September 2017) the Grand Court sanctioned a USD 3.7 billion scheme of arrangement, despite the objections of a minority creditor. In A Company-v- A Funder (unreported, 23 November 2017) the same court confirmed that commercial funding of litigation is not contrary to public policy, even if the funded party is not impecunious.

In re Ocean Rig UDW Inc

Ocean Rig UDW Inc (in provisional liquidation) (UDW), formed part of a group of companies (the group) carrying on business as an offshore ultra-deep water drilling contractor. The group fell into severe financial distress due to the sustained depression in the price of oil. UDW and three other group companies proposed four schemes of arrangement to their creditors seeking to compromise the group's USD 3.7 billion debts (collectively, the schemes). Under the Cayman Islands Companies Law (2016 Revision), the Grand Court has the power to sanction compromises and arrangements between a company and its creditors which may bind all creditors. The Cayman Islands provisions are substantially similar to the provisions under the United Kingdom's 2006 Companies Act.

The four group companies proposing schemes were initially incorporated in the Marshall Islands. In 2016, in preparation for the restructuring, UDW registered by way of continuation as an exempted company in the Cayman Islands and the three other companies registered as foreign companies in the Cayman Islands. The four companies also transferred their centre of main interests to the Cayman Islands before the schemes were proposed (and prior to the appointment of joint provisional liquidators). As part of the restructuring, the group also filed for Chapter 15 bankruptcy protection in New York.

A group of creditors with secured claims against companies in the group and substantial claims against UDW under guarantees (the guarantee creditors) supported the schemes and considered that a single class of creditors (and therefore a single court meeting) was appropriate for voting purposes. However, Highland Capital Management (which only held claims against UDW under UDW unsecured notes) opposed the UDW Scheme and considered that Highland and other noteholders of UDW had different rights to the guarantee creditors. If Highland was correct and two UDW court meetings were required, Highland would have sufficient votes at its meeting to vote down the UDW scheme.

At the convening hearing Highland submitted that it did not share a common interest with the guarantee creditors, due to the guarantee creditors' claims against other companies in the group. As such, Highland considered that the UDW noteholders should form a separate class of creditors from the guarantee creditors and two court meetings should be held (class issue). Notwithstanding the position taken by Highland, the Grand Court found that a single class of creditors was appropriate and that only one court meeting was necessary. Highland's rights were not so dissimilar to the guarantee creditors' rights as to make it impossible for them to consult together with a view to their common interest. The important consideration was the similarity of the creditors' rights against UDW, not their rights in relation to the other group companies.

At the UDW Court Meeting, the scheme was approved by 96% of UDW's creditors. The only creditor to vote against the UDW Scheme was Highland. The other three schemes were approved unanimously.

At the sanction hearing Highland objected to the sanctioning of the UDW scheme on several grounds, including objections previously advanced at the convening hearing (the sanction issue). In coming to the conclusion to reject Highland's objections, the Grand Court found that:

  • UDW had complied with the terms of the convening order and the statutory requirements of the Companies Law (2016 Revision);
  • at the court meeting, the classes of creditors were fairly represented and the majority acted in a bona fide manner; and
  • the UDW Scheme was one that an intelligent and honest scheme creditor, acting in respect of its interests, might reasonably approve, such that the court should exercise its discretion to sanction the scheme.

The judgment in Re Ocean Rig UDW Inc (in provisional liquidation) confirms that the Grand Court will follow the long line of English authority pertaining to schemes of arrangement in relation to class and sanction issues. Insolvency practitioners, creditors and proponents of schemes generally will be comforted that the Grand Court will not readily allow minority creditors to hold to ransom the majority to prevent a reasonable scheme from proceeding.

A Company v A Funder

In A Company v A Funder, the plaintiff applied to the Grand Court for a declaration that the third-party funding agreement it had entered into with the defendant was not illegal on the grounds of maintenance and champerty. While the procedural construct was somewhat artificial, the Grand Court allowed the application to proceed, given the importance of the matter to the plaintiff.

Maintenance involves the procurement by direct or indirect financial assistance of another person to institute or carry on or defend civil proceedings without lawful justification, while champerty is an aggravated form of maintenance whose distinguishing feature is the support for litigation by a stranger in return for a share of the proceeds. These doctrines were developed under English common law as a safeguard to prevent against frivolous litigation and the corruption of the public justice system through the meddling of unrelated parties.

In modern times, as the legal profession developed and procedural rules improved to better protect the justice system, several common law jurisdictions abolished the historical doctrines of maintenance and champerty. In the Cayman Islands, a draft bill has been circulated titled The Private Funding of Legal Services Bill 2015 which would repeal any offences under maintenance and champerty. While the Bill has not yet been enacted into law by the legislature, the Grand Court has recognised that the nature of common law itself needed to change to meet the needs of society. In relation to maintenance and champerty, this has meant an increasing willingness by the Grand Court to allow third-party litigation funding, as long as adequate protections were built into such arrangements to prevent the corruption of public justice. The decision in A Company v A Funder confirms this approach.

After canvassing the recent Cayman Islands authorities and taking into account the developments in several other common law jurisdictions, Segal J found that as a matter of principle, a litigation funding agreement will not be unlawful by reason of maintenance and champerty if it does not have a tendency to corrupt public justice. To ensure a litigation funding agreement does not tend to corrupt public justice, Segal J found that the terms of the agreement should inter alia:

  • limit the extent to which the funder can control litigation;
  • limit the ability of the funder to terminate the funding agreement without reasonable cause;
  • limit the level of communication between the funder and the funded party's solicitors;
  • ensure that any costs award against the funded party will be able to be paid;
  • ensure that the funded party is able to make informed decisions about the litigation; and
  • ensure that the funded party maintains a material interest in the outcome of the litigation.

Provided the above principles are respected and the important policy goals are achieved then commercial funding of litigation, which can promote access to justice, should not be objectionable or subject to enhanced requirements or constraints.

Accordingly, even though the plaintiff was not in liquidation and not impecunious, the Grand Court found that the funding agreement would not be illegal under the doctrines of maintenance and champerty. Segal J found that there are clearly benefits that may flow from allowing plaintiffs with genuine claims the opportunity to litigate them on terms which they consider to be commercially attractive and provide them with a better risk-reward ratio than if they were to fund the costs of litigation themselves. The ruling will likely result in an increase in the usage of such funding agreements, which, for all of the reasons set out by the learned judge, can only be a good thing.


Although these two cases involved different issues of law, together they demonstrate the unified approach of the Grand Court to be mindful of commercial realities as it reaches the correct legal result. Once again in 2017, the Cayman Islands has confirmed itself as a world-class jurisdiction for complex litigation and restructuring, here's to 2018!

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions