Cayman Islands: Recent Judgment Of The Cayman Islands Court Of Appeal Concerning Validation Orders

Last Updated: 24 May 2018
Article by Ben Hobden, Erik Bodden and Jordan McErlean

In the recent decision of Aurora Funds Management Limited et al -v- Torchlight GP Limited1 the Cayman Islands Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal brought in respect of an order made by McMillan J in the Grand Court validating certain payments made by Torchlight GP Limited (the "General Partner") in accordance with Section 99 of the Companies Law.


The validation order which was the subject of the appeal was made during the course of proceedings involving a just and equitable winding up petition (Cause No. FSD 103 of 2015) (the "Petition"), which was presented on 18 June 2015 against Torchlight Fund LP (the "Partnership"), a solvent, closed ended fund which specialises in investment in distressed assets. The Petition was brought by various limited partners of the Partnership (the "Appellants"): (i) Accident Compensation Corporation of New Zealand ("ACC"), (ii) Crown Asset Management Limited ("CAML") and (iii) Aurora Funds Management Ltd ("Aurora"). The General Partner, which has defended the Petition proceedings on behalf of the Partnership, was the respondent to the appeal (the "Respondent").

Grand Court Decision

On 22 January 2016, Clifford J granted an injunction against the General Partner which prevented it from making any disposition of the assets of the Partnership to related parties without the consent of the Appellants or an order of the Court (the "Related Party Injunction"). The terms of the Related Party Injunction anticipated that an application to the Court could be made to validate payments which, if granted, would therefore not be prohibited by the Related Party Injunction.

Section 99 of the Companies Law provides that, upon the making of a winding up order:

"[A]ny disposition of the company's property and any transfer of shares or alteration in the status of the company's members made after the commencement of the winding up is, unless the Court otherwise orders, void."

Validation orders made pursuant to Section 99 are commonly sought by entities which are the subject of insolvency proceedings, as they prevent any dispositions made by the relevant entity, subsequent to the presentation of a winding up petition being rendered automatically void in the event that a winding up order is ultimately made.

The General Partner issued a summons on 8 September 2016 seeking an order from the Court, pending the determination of the winding up proceedings, sanctioning various dispositions (several of which would otherwise have been caught by the Related Party Injunction) such as inter alia: (i) payments due under a loan to a third party; (ii) payments to other entities in the Torchlight Group; (iii) payments to legal advisors; and (iv) payments to various service providers.

The parties had essentially agreed for the purposes of the hearing before the Grand Court that the correct principles to be applied by the Judge when considering making a validation order were established by Henderson J in In the Matter of Fortuna Development Corporation2 and supplemented by Smellie CJ in his subsequent Judgment in In the matter of the Cybervest Fund3. In Fortuna Henderson J indicated that in the case of a solvent company, the following four elements had to be established before an applicant would be entitled to a validation order:

  1. The proposed disposition must appear to be within the powers of the directors.
  2. The evidence must show that the directors believe the disposition is necessary or expedient in the interests of the company.
  3. It must appear that in reaching the decision to make the disposition the directors have acted in good faith (the burden of establishing bad faith being on the party opposing the application).
  4. The reasons for the disposition must be shown to be ones which an intelligent and honest director could reasonably hold.

Here, after considering the test in Fortuna, McMillan J noted the following:

"It is important to note that the test is not a high one. Although much time and indeed energy have been expended upon this issue, the Court reminds itself both that these are interlocutory proceedings only, where no final determinations of facts have yet been made, and moreover that it is not the function of the Court to place itself in the role of directors or of a General Partner or directly assume their business responsibilities."

Turning then to Cybervest, after mentioning Smellie CJ's cautionary note relating to cases in which 'irregularities in the conduct of the company can be shown', McMillan J observed that, 'at this stage of proceedings the alleged circumstances of the instant case cannot be said to be comparable in scope or severity with those alleged in [Cybervest], taking the matter broadly as it stands as a whole.'

Ultimately, McMillan J decided that the relevant legal criteria was satisfied on the basis of the evidence before him, and subsequently made an order on 6 December 2016 (the "Validation Order"), which granted the validation application and, after a further hearing on 19 January 2017, made further detailed orders to give effect to the Validation Order.

Court of Appeal Decision

Whilst it was not in dispute that McMillan J had applied the correct legal test, the Appellants' principal complaint was that McMillan J had failed to give adequate reasons for his decision to make the Validation Order. The Appellants also complained that there was 'a demonstrable failure' by McMillan J to consider the relevant evidence, and that McMillan J's decision to make the Validation Order 'cannot be reasonably explained or justified and the decisions he made were decisions that no reasonable judge could have reached.'

The Appellants based their contentions on various authorities such as:

  • English -v- Emery Reimbold & Strick Ltd4 (this indicated that a judge is required to provide adequate reasons in order to enable a losing litigant to understand why they lost);
  • Tommy Crinion et al -v- IG Markets Ltd5 (this indicated that a judge who simply wholesale adopts the submissions put forward by one party will not discharge his duty as a judge); and
  • Henderson -v- Foxworth Investments Ltd6.

In response, leading counsel for the General Partner7 submitted that McMillan J had correctly adopted the Fortuna test, addressed all of the Appellants' objections, considered all of the evidence, applied the appropriate principles and arrived at a rational decision. He noted that in considering the evidence, McMillan J had particularly relied on: (i) a letter from the Partnership's administrator, which confirmed that the calculation of the fees paid to the General Partner were indeed correct; and (ii) the consistent unqualified audited accounts prepared by the Partnership's auditors.

Further, in response to the Appellants' contention that McMillan J had given insufficient reasons for his decision, the Court of Appeal was taken to the House of Lords decision in South Bucks District Council and another -v- Porter (No 2)8, which indicated that although reasons for a decision should be intelligible and adequate to enable the reader to ascertain what was decided, they could, depending on the nature of the issues in dispute, be briefly stated.

In its Judgment, the Court of Appeal noted that there was very little in dispute between the parties as to the relevant principles which should apply when the Court is considering making a validation order, nor was it said that McMillan J had incorrectly applied them, and that to the extent to which there were any differences in the parties' suggested approach, it was primarily a matter of emphasis regarding certain passages of Re Burton & Deakin Ltd, Fortuna or Cybervest respectively. Ultimately, the only question that the Court of Appeal was asked to consider was whether McMillan J exercised his discretion under Section 99 in a demonstrably rational manner when he applied the relevant principles to the facts.

After a review of the relevant authorities, the Court of Appeal acknowledged that whilst those authorities indicated that there were strong reasons why as a general proposition Judges are required to give reasons for their decision, nonetheless they indicated that a departure from such a rule at first instance should not mean that as a general rule an appeal against such a decision must automatically be granted. Rather, the appellate court should very closely analyse the evidence and submissions made at first instance to determine whether justice had been done. In the words of Lord Brown in South Bucks District Council and another -v- Porter (No 2), the appealing party must prove to the satisfaction of the Court:

"[T]hat he has genuinely been substantially prejudiced by the failure to provide an adequately reasoned decision..."

The Court of Appeal concluded that McMillan J had applied the correct test. It indicated that in order for McMillan J's decision to be successfully challenged on appeal, it was necessary for the Appellants to demonstrate that McMillan J had proceeded on some wrong principle, or otherwise misunderstood the law which he was required to apply, or the evidence which the parties provided for his consideration. The Court of Appeal was not satisfied that the Appellants had demonstrated that and therefore found no reason to interfere with McMillan J's decision.

In terms of the costs of the Appeal proceedings, the Court of Appeal made the exceptional order that the General Partner's costs be paid immediately, on the basis that the Appeal had been finally disposed of, rather than the usual order for costs following the final determination of the substantive Petition proceedings.

*Torchlight GP Limited and Torchlight Fund LP have been represented by Conyers Dill & Pearman during the course of the Petition proceedings and the related appeals. Oral closings in the petition proceedings were heard in late 2017, as at the date of writing this client alert, the Judgment has not yet been handed down.


1. (Unreported, 27 April 2018) (CICA 1 of 2017)

2. [2004-05] CILR 533

3. [2006] CILR 80

4. [2002] 1WLR 2409

5. [2013] EWCA Civ 587

6. [2014] UKSC 41

7. John Wardell, QC

8. [2004] UKHL 33; [2004] 1WLR 1953

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions