Contributor Page
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
 
Email  |  Website  |  Articles
Contact Details
Tel: +1 202 4084000
Fax: +1 202 4084400
901 New York Avenue, NW
Washington, DC
20001-4413
United States
By Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
The electronic priority document exchange (PDX) program avoids the fee associated with ordering certified priority document for each office of subsequent
By Daniel Klodowski, David Seastrunk, Michael R Galgano, Aaron Parker, Elliot C. Cook
This special report explores IPR claim survival rates and the volume of issued final written decisions issued cumulatively through Q2 (June 30) 2019.
By Elyse McNamara, Margaret Esquenet
Yogis are causing Instagram envy worldwide—women and men executing advanced yoga poses against backdrops of beautiful rock
By Linda Thayer
There's been a lot of press lately about FaceApp, the newly popular photo-editing software developed by Russian developers based in St. Petersburg
By J. Derek McCorquindale
Welcome to the Last Month at the Federal Circuit—a look at recent decisions from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit impacting the intellectual property community.
By Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
To search for issued and published sequences, the USPTO maintains a website that provides sequence listings, tables, and other mega items for granted U.S.
By Fionnuala Richardson
Securing colour trade mark registrations in the EU can be challenging. The EU trade mark Registry faces the difficult task of balancing the rights provided
By Sara A. Leiman, C. Collette Corser, Adriana Burgy
In an inter partes review Final Written Decision, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board found all challenged claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,881,745 unpatentable as anticipated or obvious.
By Benjamin Cassady, Lionel Lavenue
The U.S. Court of Federal Claims may grant attorney fees to certain patent owners who successfully litigate infringement claims against the federal government.
By Brad Richards, Caitlin E. O'Connell
Scott Blair appeals from a final decision from the PTAB finding the challenged claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,700,602 ("the '602 patent") invalid as obvious.
By Emily Gabranski
In 2013, the USPTO moved to the Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) system, a jointly developed system with the European Patent Office (EPO).
By J. Derek McCorquindale
Welcome to the Last Month at the Federal Circuit – a look at recent Federal Circuit decisions impacting the intellectual property community.
By Joseph M. Schaffner, Erika Arner, Jeffrey Berkowitz, Aliza G. Carrano, Thomas Irving, Stacy Lewis
Under the America Invents Act ("AIA"), supplemental examinations allow patent owners to ask the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
By Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
The USPTO maintains a listing of withdrawn patent numbers from 1790 to current date. The USPTO notes that this listing consists of patent numbers that do not correspond to issued patents
By Brett Heavner, Margaret Esquenet
Since 1983, Plaintiff Bodum USA Inc. ("Bodum") has been selling the iconic "Chambord" line of French Press coffeemaker, which features the following proprietary design elements: (1)
Contributor's Topics
More...