Contributor Page
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
 
Email  |  Website  |  Articles
Contact Details
Tel: +1 202 4084000
Fax: +1 202 4084400
901 New York Avenue, NW
Washington, DC
20001-4413
United States
By John Paul, Brian Kacedon, M. David Weingarten
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit determined that a Brazilian corporation that installed infringing conveyor systems on a U.S.-flagged ship could be sued for patent infringement...
By John Paul, Brian Kacedon, Cecilia Sanabria
A state's sovereign immunity does not allow its agencies to avoid the requirements of the patent venue statute.
By John Paul, Brian Kacedon, Robert MacKichan III
A corporation is not a resident of every district in the state of incorporation for purposes of the patent venue statute.
By David Seastrunk, Daniel Klodowski, Elliot Cook
Through June 15, 2018, the Federal Circuit decided 377 PTAB appeals from IPRs and CBMs.
In Sirona Dental Systems GmbH v. Institut Straumann AG, the Federal Circuit affirmed-in-part, vacated-in-part, and remanded-in-part the PTAB's decision.
By Elizabeth Ferrill, Margaret Esquenet
Software as a Medical Device–also referred to as SaMD–is one of the fastest growing innovations in the medical device industry
By Kathleen A. Daley
In this podcast, Finnegan partner Kathleen Daley offers insight into three recently-decided Federal Circuit cases and their potential implications:
Apple appeals from a Western District of Wisconsin jury decision, finding Apple vicariously liable for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,781,752 by Samsung, a third-party, and awarding the Wisconsin Alumni Research Fund ("WARF") $506 million in damages.
By Daniel Klodowski, David Seastrunk, Michael R Galgano
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board issued 34 IPR and CBM Final Written Decisions in May, including decisions following remands from the Federal Circuit...
By Danny Awdeh, Benjamin Tookey
The World Cup provides more gold than just the trophy won by the last team standing.
By Elizabeth Ferrill
Jenny Yoo Collection, Inc. v. Watters Designs, Inc. et al, Civil Action No. 3:17-cv-3197-M (N.D.Tex. June 6, 2018).
By Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
The USPTO Patent Application Initiatives Timeline displays various programs and initiatives that are available to applicants during each phase of the application process.
By Sanya Sukduang, Thomas Sullivan
The state of biosimilars in the US has never been hotter; 2017 was the most active year to date for biosimilar drug manufacturers since the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act ...
By Linda A. Wadler, Alissa Lipton
On June 22, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a significant decision regarding the recovery of lost profits for foreign uses of a U.S. patented invention.
By Mark T. Hagler
The Federal Circuit in Stone Basket Innovations, LLC v. Cook Medical LLC affirmed the district court, holding that the case was not exceptional.
Contributor's Topics
More...