Mondaq USA: Intellectual Property
Epstein Becker & Green
In E.J. Brooks Company v. Cambridge Security Seals, the Court of Appeals of New York narrowed the scope of permissible damage claims plaintiffs can assert in trade secret actions under New York law.
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
In the world of academia and research, scientists spend countless hours thinking, researching, experimenting, and finally, drafting manuscripts before sending them off to journal editors and reviewers.
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
In Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., the Federal Circuit vacated and remanded the district court's grant of summary judgment relying on an erroneous claim construction, and affirmed its indefiniteness determination.
Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
In response to two guilty pleas in two weeks relating to an intricate conspiracy to steal biomedical research, U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, William M. McSwain pledged his support ...
Shumaker & Sieffert, P.A.
On June 1, 2018, the Federal Circuit vacated and remanded the District Court for the Northern District of California's decision invalidating Zeroclick's asserted claims.
Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP
In NantKwest, Inc. v. Iancu, No. 2016-1794 (Fed. Cir. Jul. 27, 2018) (en banc), the Federal Circuit decided en banc that attorneys' fees are not "expenses" required to be paid by an applicant who appeals ...
Last Thursday, a court in the Northern District of Illinois upheld the trademark "UGG" for wool-lined boots against charges of genericide.
Jones Day
An adverse decision in an IPR proceeding is appealable only to the Federal Circuit.
Jones Day
Practitioners, law school students, and anyone who wants to learn about practice before these administrative tribunals are encouraged to attend.
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
The Federal Circuit first explained that a petitioner always bears the ultimate burden of persuasion to show that the petition is not time barred.
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
Whether a non-party should be listed as an RPI is a fact-dependent inquiry.
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Scanlon's copying continued up to the day she informed National Fish of her plans to resign.
Ward and Smith, P.A.
Patent attorneys and patent agents ("patent practitioners") deal with the best and brightest engineers and scientists on a daily basis.
Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP
In Matthews International Corporation v. Vandor Corporation, No. 2017-1889 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 27, 2018) (non-precedential), the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB's final written decision to uphold the claims...
Ward and Smith, P.A.
As you read this article, hundreds of startups and other organizations are working on blockchain applications ...
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
It has been said that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) appeal 95% of the time just by looking at the marks and the goods or services.
Stites & Harbison PLLC
One of the facts of modern life is that you will be the target of scams. Sometimes it's the son of the former defense minister of Nigeria.
Ward and Smith, P.A.
The federal legalization of hemp grown under state-sanctioned research programs in the Agricultural Act of 2014, combined with the myriad uses of hemp, including cannabidiol ...
Ward and Smith, P.A.
After the United States Supreme Court's 2014 decision in Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank Int'l, many inventors and patent practitioners were left asking ...
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP
In August, Massachusetts became the 49th state to sign into law its version of a Uniform Trade Secrets Act (MUTSA).
Latest Video
Most Popular Recent Articles
Pryor Cashman LLP
Following her September 2017 appearance on CNBC's "Nightly Business Report," Partner Dyan Finguerra-DuCharme returned to the program for a segment exploring ways to identify and avoid scams involving intellectual property.
Jones Day
One PRO petitioned a federal district court, asking the court to declare that its consent decree does not require full-work licensing.
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
The Board affirmed a refusal to register SHAPE XXXX for educational publications and services on the ground that the term is a phantom mark that comprises more than one mark.
Partners Carl Hittinger and Jeffry Duffy authored an article published by The Legal Intelligencer on July 27, 2018.
Stites & Harbison PLLC
A familiar adage teaches that one catches more flies with honey than with vinegar. Without in any way implying that infringers are flies, we can apply this lesson to the trademark context.
Thompson Coburn LLP
The "it's on the Internet, so I can use it" excuse has been rejected once again, this time by the European Union's highest court.
Brinks Gilson & Lione
A paradigm shift is apparently underway at a number of Florida's general practice firms.
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Immediate and inexpensive, social media drives advertising directly to your target consumer. Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, dedicated blogs, and self-hosted chat forums are important business...
Smith Gambrell & Russell LLP
The biggest recent development involving ICANN results from the general data protection regulation known as GDPR and the regulation which became fully effective on May 25, 2018
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
On April 24, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision in Oil States Energy Services v. Greene's Energy Group, 138 S. Ct. 1365 (2018), holding that inter partes review proceedings ...
Article Search Using Filters
Related Topics
Mondaq Advice Center (MACs)
Popular Authors
Popular Contributors
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
In association with