Mondaq USA: Intellectual Property > Trademark
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Interested in learning about upcoming USPTO events.
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
The Board dismissed this petition for cancellation on summary judgment, ruling that the USPTO's acceptance of an untimely Section 8 Declaration is not a ground for cancellation.
Holland & Knight
Reported verdicts and settlements in the last 10 years confirm that commercial landlords/owners could be held liable for the trademark infringement activity of their tenants.
Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, PC
In June 2017, the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO") proposed streamlined cancellation procedures in an effort to save practitioners and trademark owners both time and money.
Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, PC
Such requests are to be filed with the relevant jurisdiction's local trademark office rather than with WIPO.
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
The Board affirmed two refusals of the mark SOUTHFACE VILLAGE, in standard character and design form, for "providing an Internet portal offering information in the fields of real estate
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
The USPTO refused registration of the mark NEW SILK ROAD for clothing, on the ground that the mark is deceptive under Section 2(a) ...
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
"The Trademark Office Comes to California," set for April 2 in San Francisco, and April 4 in Los Angeles, is one of the flagship events hosted by the California Lawyers Association Intellectual
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
It is well known that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) does not allow federal registration for cannabis-related trademarks (discussed by this blog here and here).
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
Kicking Horse Coffee won again at the TTAB (its prior victory was TTABlogged here), this time giving the boot to the mark KICK ASS ...
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
The Trademark Reporter has published its latest Annual Review of U.S. Trademark Cases: "The Seventy-First Year of Administration of the Lanham Act of 1946
Pryor Cashman LLP
Intellectual Property Partner Dyan Finguerra-DuCharme appeared on CNBC Business News to discuss the increasing number of imposters hijacking well-known luxury brands on e-commerce sites and replacing bona fide products with counterfeits.
Jones Day
As we wrote previously, the Federal Circuit sitting en banc held that a patent applicant can seek district court review of a PTO rejection of its application without having to pay for the time the PTO's attorneys spent on the case.
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
Finding that the bearded skull design, below, fails to function as a trademark for various clothing items, the Board affirmed a refusal to register under Sections 1, 2, and 45 of the Lanham Act.
Foley & Lardner
On February 20, 2019, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case Mission Products, Inc. v. Tempnology, LLC.
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
On October 29, 1982, former Judge Helen W. Nies wrote the opinion for Sanyo Watch Co., Inc. v. Sanyo Elec. Co., Ltd. 691 F.2d 1019 (Fed. Cir. 1982).
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
In a 33-page opinion, the Board sustained this opposition to registration of CRABS ADJUST HUMIDITY, in standard character and design form, finding the mark likely to cause confusion with the registered mark CARDS AGAINST HUMANITY.
Pryor Cashman LLP
Under Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act, a trademark may be refused registration if it consists of immoral or scandalous matter
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
In this brew-ha-ha over the mark COFFEE STUDIO, Respondent Reign LLC moved for dismissal after petitioner failed to submit any evidence or testimony during its testimony period.
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
The 2019 Annual Review of U.S. Trademark Cases, co-authored by John L. Welch and titled "The Seventy-First Year of Administration of the Lanham Act of 1946
Latest Video
Most Popular Recent Articles
Duane Morris LLP
In 2014, Elon Musk announced that he was "open-sourcing" Tesla's patents.
Foley & Lardner
Manufacturers may assume that protection of their brands can only be achieved through trademark protection of names, logos, and slogans.
Pryor Cashman LLP
Intellectual Property Partner Dyan Finguerra-DuCharme appeared on CNBC Business News to discuss the increasing number of imposters hijacking well-known luxury brands on e-commerce sites and replacing bona fide products with counterfeits.
Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
In most industries, federal trademark registration is seen as an attractive form of protection, because federal registration converts ...
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
When we last visited (here) the long-running Bayer versus Belmora battle over the mark FLANAX, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit had reversed and remanded the case to the U.S. District
Stites & Harbison PLLC
The U.S. Supreme Court has granted the U.S. government's petition for a writ of certiorari in a case challenging provision of the federal trademark statute.
Cooley LLP
In short, those looking for a clear signal how the Court will rule are going to be disappointed.
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
This guest post was authored by John L. Strand, Trademark and Litigation Shareholder at Wolf Greenfield.
Pryor Cashman LLP
Under Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act, a trademark may be refused registration if it consists of immoral or scandalous matter
Fenwick & West LLP
Fenwick trademark litigation partner Eric Ball spoke to Bloomberg Law about cases involving individuals confronting their famous family members over trademark rights to the family name...
Article Search Using Filters
Related Topics
Mondaq Advice Center (MACs)
Popular Authors
Popular Contributors
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
Partners
In association with