Mondaq USA: Intellectual Property
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton
On July 1, 2019, only few days after Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe opened the G20 summit with a speech endorsing an open global economy, the Japanese government announced that it will impose tighter controls on...
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
The oil and gas industry is facing uncertainty and rapid change. Low prices are forcing companies to increase efficiency, and many companies are producing more costly and technologically complex resources
Dennemeyer Group
On August 3, a new rule became effective at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) requiring foreign-domiciled trademark applicants and registrants to be represented by an attorney who is licensed to practice law...
Mintz
The Federal Circuit in Amgen Inc. v. Coherus Biosciences Inc. affirmed a district court decision that once certain subject matter is clearly and unmistakably surrendered during prosecution, the patentee is barred from ...
Foley & Lardner
Recent Federal Circuit decisions demonstrate that the doctrine of equivalents is alive and well, and not always barred by claim amendments. In both Ajinomoto Co. v. ITC and Eli Lilly and Co. v. Hospira, Inc., the Federal...
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Seyfarth Partner Jesse Coleman is presenting the "Recent Trends in Protecting and Exploiting Trade Secrets" program at an LES Houston event on August 28 at The Briar Club in Houston.
Ropes & Gray LLP
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) will host a Boardside Chat webinar this Thursday, August 22, from noon to 1 p.m. ET
Fenwick & West LLP
In Rimini Street v. Oracle USA, the U.S. Supreme Court held unanimously that the "full costs" the Copyright Act authorizes federal district courts to award a party in copyright litigation
Fenwick & West LLP
In April, Senators Chris Coons (D-DE) and Thom Tillis (R-NC) proposed a draft framework for legislation reformulating the standards for determining patent eligibility under § 101 of the Patent Act.
Fenwick & West LLP
On June 24, 2019, the U.S. Supreme Court, in Iancu v. Brunetti, struck down the Lanham Act's prohibition on the registration of "immoral" or "scandalous" trademarks.
Fish & Richardson PC
This post is a part of a monthly series summarizing notable activity in patent litigation in the District of Massachusetts, including short summaries of substantive orders.
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
In Celgene Corp. v. Peter, Nos. 2018-1167, 2018-1168, 2018-1169, 2018-1171 (Fed. Cir. July 30, 2019)
Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P
Nalpropion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc (Fed. Cir. Aug. 15, 2019) is a precedential opinion written by Judge Lourie with Judge Wallach and a dissent from Judge Prost
Fenwick & West LLP
As artificial intelligence systems become more prevalent in daily life, efforts to create a unifying set of AI principles have intensified
Fenwick & West LLP
Federal grants are an important source of funding for many businesses and research institutions.
Holland & Knight
The Federal Circuit provided an undesirable reminder to The University of Bern (and many other patent owners)
Holland & Knight
Rocksmith sued Yousician Oy, alleging infringement of its patent entitled "interactive guitar game."
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
In Amgen Inc. v. Coherus Biosciences Inc., No. 2018-1993 (Fed. Cir. July 29, 2019), the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Amgen's infringement
BakerHostetler
The language of the patent damages statute, 35 U.S.C. § 284, appears straightforward – "[u]pon finding for the claimant the court shall award the claimant damages adequate to compensate for
BakerHostetler
On Aug. 3, a new regulation promulgated by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) will take effect and require all trademark applicants
Latest Video
Most Popular Recent Articles
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP
The 2018 California legislative session was another busy year with numerous employment-related bill signed into law.
Morrison & Foerster LLP
The Supreme Court's recent decision in Mission Product Holdings, Inc., v. Tempnology, LLC [1] clarifies that a debtor-licensor's rejection of a trademark license under § 365(a) ...
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
The Board dismissed this petition for cancellation of Roman Atwood's registration for the mark SMILE MORE for various goods (stickers, backpacks, shirts) and for retail store service featuring clothing, denying petitioner's claim that the term fails to function as a mark.
Hausfeld
Endo's patent litigation against Impax continued, and the trial commenced June 3, 2010.
Cooley LLP
As 2019 kicks off, the Cooley antitrust group highlights 10 recent developments and trends corporate counsel should be aware of – from the US Supreme Court and lower courts, the DoJ and FTC ...
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP
In a curious legal scenario, the USPTO recently filed an amicus brief at the request of the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, supporting a "counterintuitive" reading of the American Invents Act (AIA).
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
Today, companies are developing AI systems to meaningfully analyze the deluge of biomedical data.
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Since 1983, Plaintiff Bodum USA Inc. ("Bodum") has been selling the iconic "Chambord" line of French Press coffeemaker, which features the following proprietary design elements: (1)
Arnold & Porter
In June, the US Supreme Court held in Knick v. Township of Scott that property owners may file an inverse condemnation claim in federal court as long as they base their claim on the Fifth Amendment.
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Scott Blair appeals from a final decision from the PTAB finding the challenged claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,700,602 ("the '602 patent") invalid as obvious.
Article Search Using Filters
Related Topics
Mondaq Advice Center (MACs)
Popular Authors
Popular Contributors
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
Partners
In association with