Mondaq All Regions - India: Anti-trust/Competition Law
Khaitan & Co
The Information, inter alia, averred that the GSA was a standard contract whose minimum duration was 20 years.
Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas
In an attempt to further streamline the merger control process, the Competition Commission of India has for the sixth time since the introduction of the merger control regime in India, amended the ...
Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas
Can enterprises be in violation of the Competition Act, 2002 (Competition Act) when prevailing market conditions are themselves not conducive to a competitive market?
Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas
In a recent order, the Competition Commission of India has granted Panasonic Energy India Co. Ltd. ("Panasonic India") and its office bearers, a 100% penalty reduction under the leniency regime provided by the Competition Act, 2002.
Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas
Recently, the CCI published advocacy material in the form of a competition assessment toolkit intended for policymakers, researchers, analysts, and competition stakeholders; and a diagnostic toolkit for procurement officers.
S.S. Rana & Co. Advocates
In the modern market scenario and increasing levels of competition, business entities are required to undergo change in their corporate structures.
Khaitan & Co
The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by 45 liquified petroleum gas cylinder manufacturers, setting aside CCI orders and order of the former Competition Appellate Tribunal, which had held that the manufacturers indulged in bid rigging ...
Khaitan & Co
The NCLAT set aside the order of the CCI which penalized Hyundai Motors India Ltd. with a fine of INR 870,000,000 i.e. 0.3% of its average relevant turnover for indulging in resale price maintenance and tie-in agreements.
Vaish Associates Advocates
By way of order dated August 30, 2018, the CCI imposed a penalty of INR 9,64 06,682 on Geep Industries (India) Private limited (‘Geep') for being in a bilateral ancillary cartel with Panasonic (India).
Khaitan & Co
The Competition Commission of India (CCI) notified the Competition Commission of India (Procedure in regard to the transaction of business relating to combinations) Amendment Regulations, 2018 on 9 October 2018 (Amendment Regulations).
IndusLaw
The Supreme Court of India (the "Supreme Court") in its order dated October 1, 2018 (the "Order") has set aside the orders passed by the Competition Commission of India (the "Commission") and the former Competition Appellate Tribunal (the "COMPAT")
IndusLaw
On September 19, 2018, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal set aside the Competition Commission of India's order dated June 14, 2017 which held Hyundai Motor India Limited ...
S.S. Rana & Co. Advocates
In the modern world, the technology driven population adopts to more user friendly and easily approachable media to avail the required products and services.
Vaish Associates Advocates
The only aspect on which Cadila has succeeded, is about allowing cross examination of the witness named under the review application.
Vaish Associates Advocates
Hence, the DG concluded that DLF group was no longer in a dominant position.
Vaish Associates Advocates
The Competition Commission of India vide order dated 30.08.2018 imposed penalty of Rs. 9,72 ,943/- on Karnataka Film Chamber of Commerce for acting in violation of the provisions of the Competition Act, 2002 ...
Vaish Associates Advocates
The Competition Commission of India vide order dated 30/08/18 imposed a penalty of Rs.9,64 06,682 on Geep Industries (India) Private limited for acting in violation of Section 3(3) read with Section 3(1) of the Competition Act, 2002.
Vaish Associates Advocates
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal by way of a judgement dated 25 July 2018 has upheld the penalty imposed by the Competition Commission of India on 11 cement companies for cartelization.
Vaish Associates Advocates
The CCI's decision is the fourth order to be passed under the Leniency provisions.
Vaish Associates Advocates
As a result the quoted rates for Railway Signalling Cables were higher in comparison to the prevailing market rates.
Latest Video
Most Popular Recent Articles
Vaish Associates Advocates
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal by way of a judgement dated 25 July 2018 has upheld the penalty imposed by the Competition Commission of India on 11 cement companies for cartelization.
Vaish Associates Advocates
By way of order dated August 30, 2018, the CCI imposed a penalty of INR 9,64 06,682 on Geep Industries (India) Private limited (‘Geep') for being in a bilateral ancillary cartel with Panasonic (India).
Khaitan & Co
The Competition Commission of India (CCI) notified the Competition Commission of India (Procedure in regard to the transaction of business relating to combinations) Amendment Regulations, 2018 on 9 October 2018 (Amendment Regulations).
IndusLaw
The Supreme Court of India (the "Supreme Court") in its order dated October 1, 2018 (the "Order") has set aside the orders passed by the Competition Commission of India (the "Commission") and the former Competition Appellate Tribunal (the "COMPAT")
S.S. Rana & Co. Advocates
The Competition Act, 2002 focuses to sustain competition, protect the interests of the consumers and ensure freedom of trade in markets in India.
Vaish Associates Advocates
Hence, the DG concluded that DLF group was no longer in a dominant position.
Vaish Associates Advocates
The only aspect on which Cadila has succeeded, is about allowing cross examination of the witness named under the review application.
Khaitan & Co
As per a recent amendment, the Competition Appellate Tribunal (COMPAT) has ceased to exist effective 26 May 2017.
IndusLaw
On September 19, 2018, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal set aside the Competition Commission of India's order dated June 14, 2017 which held Hyundai Motor India Limited ...
S.S. Rana & Co. Advocates
In the modern world, the technology driven population adopts to more user friendly and easily approachable media to avail the required products and services.
L&L Partners
The CCI has adjudicated on the concept of RPM, through three decided judgments.
Khaitan & Co
In this instant case, the Supreme Court set aside part of the NCLAT's order and restored the appeal that had been dismissed by the NCLAT.
Article Search Using Filters
Related Topics
Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Popular Authors
Popular Contributors
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
Partners
In association with