Keywords: Germany, Unified Patent Court, Unitary Patent, UPC Agreement

On 16 February 2016, the German Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection published the first draft of legislation that will make it possible for Germany to ratify the UPC Agreement. The draft law granting consent for ratification was published together with accompanying draft legislation to implement the unitary patent system into German law. The accompanying law proposal in particular contains changes to German patent and civil procedure law to accommodate the unitary patent. It, among other things, also addresses the delegation of German judges to the UPC.

After a period of consultation, it is anticipated that final draft laws will be introduced into the German parliament before the summer of 2016. These will then pass through the legislative process in parliament for debate, any amendments, and then a final vote—probably in autumn.

Dr. Ulrich Worm and Benjamin Beck, a partner and a research assistant, respectively, in the Intellectual Property practice group of Mayer Brown, analyzed the current state of ratification of the Unified Patent Court Agreement in Germany in a recent article published in World Intellectual Property Review (WIPR). To read their article, Oktoberfest for the UPC?, click here.

Originally published March 24, 2016

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

© Copyright 2016. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.