Germany: Disputes Between Corporations In the US and Germany

Arbitration in Switzerland As An Acceptable Solution
Last Updated: 1 February 2000


The following fact pattern will serve as a basis for illustrating some of the practical issues that arise regarding governing law and dispute resolution.

A German company produces and sells machines to a New York corporation. The German company uses an affiliate in the United States through which to pass the contract. The contract is in English. On the request of the purchaser, a clause is inserted in the agreement that the laws of the State of New York are applicable and that any dispute will be decided by the New York courts.

The machine is delivered but, before handing over the product to the customer, it is to undergo a testing period. The complex machinery is controlled by special computer software. Unfortunately, during the testing period, an explosion occurs. The damage amounts to US$3million.


This chapter concentrates on the crucial period between the signing of the contract and the commencement of litigation. The time between those two periods provides an opportunity to review certain details under a magnifying glass. Often, new aspects emerge. This may be turned into an initiative to renegotiate the terms of litigation proceedings. It goes without saying that the goal of such an exercise should be to abbreviate the procedure and to improve the mechanism for a more sophisticated outcome as to the substance.

Frequently, too few opportunities are seen in the "Gray Zone". Consequently, many problems burden the litigation process.

In the fact pattern, the German vendor takes the view that the purchaser handled the control devices improperly. The defendant believes that there is a product liability case. The American company was cautious enough to enter an all-risk insurance contract covering this purchase. Of course, the American insurance company is keen to find out whether it has a case or not. It can take recourse only if there is a product liability case.

The German affiliate of the vendor turns out to be a shell company, incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada. It becomes clear that a judgment given by a New York court against the United States affiliate of the German company would not be enforceable in practice.

It also becomes clear that an American court would have great difficulties in establishing the facts for a product liability case. The machine was invented and developed in Germany. All the complex technical paperwork is in German. The costs of translation and getting expert witnesses to New York appear to be prohibitive.

Growing Importance of Arbitration

There is a general consensus in the Anglo-Saxon countries and in Europe that arbitration has become increasingly attractive for companies to resolve their differences. In the United States, there is a growing acknowledgment that alternative dispute resolution brings better and quicker results. In recognition of a growing need for arbitration, a number of European countries have introduced new legislation on arbitration proceedings.


National courts have judges with national training. In most cases, too little training and experience is added to deal sufficiently with foreign jurisdictions and to equip the judge to deal efficiently with an international dispute.

An arbitration judge, therefore, should be carefully selected to suit the needs of a particular case. Obviously, the appropriate selection process saves enormous time and costs in later proceedings. The choice of arbitrator with appropriate qualifications must be made from among, e.g, professors, lawyers, professional judges, accountants, public notaries, other personalities with special competence, such as bankers, and those recommended by the Chamber of Commerce for a particular case.

Particular knowledge of a foreign legal system is frequently a "must", and a good knowledge of any relevant foreign languages is helpful. The arbitrator also must have sufficient availability. An overly busy arbitrator will delay the case. The parties should negotiate beforehand whether they want to carry out the arbitration on a day-to-day basis (the Anglo-Saxon example) or agree on other specific terms.

It also is useful to determine whether the arbitrator has professional insurance and, if so, the limits of such coverage. The purpose of this exercise is not to sue the arbitrator afterwards but to increase the awareness of responsibility for the arbitrator himself.

The selection of a properly qualified arbitrator often leads to the consequence that both parties waive any appeals procedure to save time and costs. In most cases, it also is sufficient to have a sole arbitrator.


Impact of Civil Procedures

If prospective litigating parties wish to be the masters of their own fates, they should scrutinize the procedure to which they intend to submit. The laws of civil procedure have been designed to prevent manipulation. In most countries, procedural rules have been "inflated", with the result that the procedure itself can slow the dispute resolution process. Too much attention is devoted to procedure instead of to the substance of a case. To avoid such dangers in arbitration, it appears to be prudent that the parties at least consider an agreement on the following points:

  1. A confidentiality clause;
  2. The appointment of an expert;
  3. The use of translations and interpreters;
  4. A time limit for the procedure;
  5. A jurisdiction clause; and
  6. A provision relating to extraterritorial discovery.

Confidentiality Clause

The parties should enter a confidentiality clause, assuring no publication at any point of the proceeding and no contact with third parties or the press.


The common conflict between a court-appointed expert and an expert appointed by one party can be overcome by some creative thinking. ORen, the traditional ways of appointing experts lead to a stalemate between the parties. Almost inevitably, a second expert must come in.

When both parties choose an expert together while they are still in the "Gray Zone" between the signature of the contract and start of the litigation, the chances are that the parties will stay with one expert.

Translations and Interpreters

In most instances, the translation issue is underestimated or ignored at the beginning of a contractual relationship. During the procedure, it is identified as a growing concern. By deciding on one court language, each party must know the consequences of hearing witnesses in court. The parties must distinguish between witnesses who need an interpreter and those who do not. In other words, the first category of witnesses enjoys perhaps twice as much time before answering in any cross-examination.

The background example referred to above shows clearly that the translation of technical material could result in huge costs. Furthermore, it is most probable that there will be mistakes in the translation, at least where translations of technical materials are involved. Finally, the parties should be aware of and deal with that issue beforehand, to streamline the evidence.

If the litigation is between an Anglo-Saxon lawyer and a continental lawyer, the conflict inevitably intensifies during the proceedings. While the Anglo-Saxon lawyer is used to a word-for-word transcript of the testimony, a European lawyer would he used to a short summary, prepared by the judge. The philosophical and practical differences between having pre-trial discovery can hardly be underestimated. Therefore, unpleasant surprises can be avoided if the lawyers handle these sensitive questions while still being in the "Gray Zone".

Time Limit

It may be wise to agree on a time limit for the dispute resolution procedure. The time element may become even more important than a decision on the substance itself.

A decision delivered too late may have become obsolete for one or both parties and may have lost its practical value. In unfair competition cases, the parties have often taken this into consideration by limiting themselves to injunction proceedings.

Jurisdiction Clause

In the fact pattern, the parties submitted themselves to the laws of New York. It may be in the interest of both parties to turn to another legal system once the issues of the dispute have become transparent. In fact pattern, it may be reasonable to submit the litigation to German law.

As a general consequence, it may be advisable to add a clause in international contracts in general that another law may apply if this appears to be reasonable at a later stage. Although such an agreement would not be binding, it could be used as a tool for negotiation.

In the context of selecting a different legal system, forum shopping may become equally important. The lawyers involved with service of process abroad should consider informal service between lawyers only.

Extraterritorial Discovery

Finally, the parties may want to consider the problems of extraterritorial discovery. Sometimes, questions of foreign sovereign immunity play an important role. The decision-making in the fact pattern, while the parties are in the "Gray Zone", could be as follows:

  1. The parties turn to arbitration;
  2. The parties agree on the application of Swiss Law;
  3. The parties agree on an expert beforehand; and
  4. German as a court language avoids prohibitive and possible faulty translation costs.


Arbitration would not be complete if enforcement of the arbitration ruling was not effective and this had not been considered at the beginning of the process. In many cases, the enforceability is guarantied by the New York Convention of 1958. As of 1 March 1995, 103 countries and territories have signed the New York Convention.

In each case, it must be examined whether the New York Convention or other multinational or bilateral treaties will allow a satisfactory enforcement of the arbitration award in the particular circumstances.

The parties involved should not only look at the enforceability procedure but also at the practical mechanisms of how to enforce a particular arbitration ruling in a particular country. Part of these considerations should be devoted to locating the assets of the defendant. This should be done as an ongoing process next to the arbitration proceedings, namely, before arbitration (is it worth it?), during arbitration, and possibly after arbitration. The role of a competent international investigator can help the plaintiff to avoid unnecessary frustrations.


  1. The weak position of a US judge can be explained historically, but are out of date today
  2. Discovery Procedure takes too long in the US, which is not in the interest of both litigating parties
  3. Due to different cultures and legal orders it is difficult in a German-American business dispute to accept the application of US Law or German Law. Each party making a concession to accept the foreign legal order feels insecure about a potential litigation: the fear of the unknown.
  4. An acceptable solution appears to be the neutrality of a corruption-free Arbitration Court in Switzerland

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions