Hong Kong: Sanctions For False Statements Of Truth

Last Updated: 15 September 2011
Article by Tom Fyfe and Melissa Chim

A court in Hong Kong has recently handed down significant custodial sentences (imprisonment) on two defendants who deliberately made or caused to be made false statements in court documents required to be verified by Statements of Truth. The recent case of re Kinform Limited DCMP 947 of 2011 (Kinform) appears to be the first example of such sentences since the civil justice reforms took effect in Hong Kong in April 2009. The case confirms that deliberately false Statements of Truth amount to contempt of court and can be visited with tough court sanctions.

Key points

  • A Statement of Truth should always be taken seriously and be made honestly.
  • Persons who make deliberately false Statements of Truth in court documents (such as witness statements, expert reports or pleadings) can expect to receive custodial sentences and not only a fine and/or an order of extra legal costs against them.
  • The same is true of those who cause others to make a deliberately false Statement of Truth on their behalf or who deliberately mislead their solicitors into making a false Statement of Truth.
  • Deliberately making a false Statement of Truth in a court document will be treated under the court's powers of committal for contempt of court.
  • It is not necessarily a defence to proceedings for contempt of court in connection with an allegedly deliberate false Statement of Truth that the court document concerned is not actually used at trial; a finding of contempt can still be made if the document verified by a false Statement of Truth is used in court proceedings and is likely to have interfered with the administration of justice (the court proceedings).
  • Proceedings for contempt of court in this context can be dealt with by a single judge in a civil court and not necessarily in a criminal court. That said, given the seriousness of a finding of contempt of court, such a finding should only be made pursuant to a criminal standard of proof; namely, beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • Where the maker of a Statement of Truth is mistaken but not dishonest, then that does not amount to contempt (although such a mistake in a court document could adversely affect the outcome of the court proceedings for the party on whose behalf the document is used).
  • Where a solicitor makes a Statement of Truth on behalf of a client not realising that it is based on deliberately false instructions, the solicitor could be called as a witness in any contempt proceedings against the client. In these circumstances, the protection normally afforded to solicitor-client communications by legal professional privilege may not apply.


Statements of Truth were introduced into civil litigation proceedings in Hong Kong pursuant to the civil justice reforms in April 2009. Court documents such as pleadings (formal statements of case), witness statements and expert reports are required to be verified by a Statement of Truth (RHC O.41A r.2). The wording of a Statement of Truth is prescribed in the court rules (RHC O.41A r.5). One such example is:

"I believe that the facts stated in this [Witness Statement] are true".

Affidavits (or affirmations) are similar to witness statements but are generally used to give evidence at court hearings before a trial and do not require a Statement of Truth; however, affidavits (or affirmations) are also sworn (or affirmed), and if done so dishonestly can also result in contempt of court proceedings.


In Kinform the plaintiff sued several defendants for the price of goods sold and delivered. The defendants in their defence claimed that the goods were not of satisfactory quality. As part of the defence, the defendants relied on an alleged letter of complaint (the letter of complaint) which they claimed confirmed that the defendants had complained to the plaintiff about the goods before the court proceedings. In particular, the first defendant caused the defendant's solicitor to sign a Statement of Truth as to particulars of the defence that relied on the letter of complaint.

The plaintiff applied for early judgment (without trial) but that application failed in large measure because of the false defence particulars relating to the letter of complaint. The proceedings continued and subsequently the first and third defendants each gave a witness statement (containing a Statement of Truth) that also relied on the letter of complaint.

Following the exchange of documents between the parties, the plaintiff's solicitors became suspicious as to authenticity of the letter of complaint and whether it had been back-dated. The plaintiff's solicitors commenced proceedings for contempt of court against the first and third defendants based on, among other things, the Statements of Truth in the particulars of the defence and the two witness statements. At the beginning of the trial of the plaintiff's claim the defendants effectively abandoned their defence.


The main issue in the contempt of court proceedings was whether the plaintiff had proved beyond reasonable doubt that the letter of complaint was not authentic and, if so, whether the first and third defendants had deliberately caused to be made or had made false Statements of Truth.


The court found that the letter of complaint was not authentic and decided that three acts of contempt had been committed; two by the first defendant and one by the third defendant. The first defendant had committed contempt of court by causing the defendants' solicitors to make the Statement of Truth that they had in the particulars of the defence and in making a false Statement of Truth in his witness statement. The third defendant had also committed contempt of court with respect to the Statement of Truth in his witness statement.

The court held, among other things, that it was enough for a finding of contempt to be made that a false document had or was likely to have interfered with the course of justice. Whilst perjury was generally understood to relate to making a deliberately false court oath (for example, at trial), in terms of punishments, the court was content to refer to sentences for perjury (the maximum sentence for which in Hong Kong is seven years).

With this in mind the following passage of the court's judgment on sentencing makes for salutary reading:

"Like the commission of the offence of perjury, the giving of a false statement verified by a statement of truth would undermine the whole process of our system of justice and the Court will not tolerate such an act. A clear message has to be sent to all litigants that they must not lie when they put forward their case in the form of pleadings or witness statements".

The court sentenced the first and third defendants to periods of imprisonment of five and six months respectively. The third defendant came off slightly worse, having been an ex-employee of the plaintiff and, apparently, having shown less remorse than the first defendant.


As noted, this appears to be the first time that custodial sentences have been handed down in Hong Kong in connection with contempt of court proceedings arising out of deliberately false Statements of Truth. In doing so, the court has sent out a strong message.

Generally speaking, the perceived wisdom is that lower courts may be harsher in these sorts of situations than higher courts. However, irrespective of any appeal by the first and third defendants against the sentences, the court's underlying policy in handing down custodial sentences (as expressed in the above quoted passage) is likely to be favourably reviewed by a higher court.

In many other cases of contempt of court (involving, for example, willful breach of a court order) it not uncommon for a court to hand down a fine or, in more serious cases, a custodial sentence of weeks rather than months. In that light, the two sentences handed down in Kinform are noteworthy.

If that was not bad enough the case has presumably been an expensive exercise for the defendants. In addition to the custodial sentences, the court has also ordered that the defendants pay the plaintiff's legal costs on a higher basis and the overall outcome will presumably have a significant adverse effect on the defendants' livelihoods.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions