Hong Kong: Hong Kong's Insolvency Regime: A Time Of Change

Last Updated: 27 September 2017
Article by Jeremy Leifer

Earlier this year, Hong Kong's insolvency regime turned a corner with the coming into effect of much needed amendments to its corporate insolvency statute, the Companies (Winding Up and Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance. These amendments represent the first of two phases of regime changes. This first set of changes has gone some way to strengthening creditor protection particularly for avoidance transactions prior to winding up which breach the pari passu principle, as well as to streamline the winding up process. The second phase, which should start its legislative journey later this year, will however be the 'game changer', and if this phase makes it into law in the shape that the Government is proposing, after a very long wait, Hong Kong will finally have a much needed statutory corporate rescue procedure.1

Hong Kong sits at a pivot point in North-East Asia where it serves as a major centre for financial services for the region, attracting very significant levels of corporate activity, driven by its unique geopolitical position and its cross border treaty arrangements with Mainland China. These and other factors have helped to make Hong Kong a natural focal point for both inbound transactions into Mainland China as well as outbound. Hong Kong is also recognised as having one of the most mature and trusted legal systems in Asia, which accounts for the presence of much of this activity. Given these factors, the process of modernising some of the key aspects of Hong Kong's corporate insolvency regime as a component in the corporate life cycle, is long overdue.

This article will give an overview of the first phase amendments now in force, focusing on the new creditor protection provisions, as well as covering the ground on some of some of the changes to the winding up regime. It will then look very briefly at the proposed second phase amendments, where the detail has yet to be published.

Phase 1 Amendments – Anti-Avoidance Transaction Provisions

Liability of directors and shareholders involved in share redemption or buy-back out prior to winding up

This is a new provision which can require a shareholder or a director to contribute to the assets of an insolvent company. It provides that if a winding up of the company commences within one year after the payment out of capital2 was made by the company for a redemption or buy-back of its own shares, and the company is insolvent, the shareholder involved can be made liable to pay back the amount of the capital payment received from the company. This provision works in parallel to the requirement that a majority of the directors must sign a solvency statement3 as a condition to the effectiveness of the redemption or buy-back. Directors who have signed this solvency statement can be held liable (jointly and severally with the shareholder) to contribute the amount for which the shareholder is liable, subject to a defence that the director had reasonable grounds for forming the opinion expressed in the solvency statement. Prior to the introduction of this provision, it was (and still is) a criminal offence for a director to make a solvency statement without having reasonable grounds for the opinion expressed in it. Following a director's conviction for this offence, the company (and its creditors) would receive no benefit from any monetary fine imposed by the court. This new provision corrects that anomaly.

Transactions at an undervalue voidable in certain Circumstances

This is a new statutory provision in the context of a corporate insolvency.4 Until its introduction, it existed only in the Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ordinance in the context of individual bankruptcy5 but without a corporate equivalent. It provides that if the company goes into liquidation and during the five year period before the winding up commences it has entered into a transaction with a person at an undervalue, the liquidator may apply to the court for an order to set aside the transaction. The court has wide ranging powers to make an order to restore the position to what it would have been if the company had not entered into the transaction.

A transaction entered into by a company with a person is a 'transaction at an undervalue' if:

  1. the company makes a gift to that person, or otherwise enters into a transaction with that person on terms that provide for the company to receive no consideration; or
  2. the company enters into a transaction with that person for a consideration the value of which, in money or money's worth, is significantly less than the value, in money or money's worth, of the consideration provided by the company.

The court must not make an order if it is satisfied that (i) the company entered into the transaction in good faith and for the purpose of carrying on its business, and (ii) at the time the company did so, there were reasonable grounds for believing that the transaction would benefit the company.

Notably, the transaction under scrutiny will only be regarded as a 'transaction at an undervalue' if either (a) at the time of the transaction the company was unable to pay its debts as they fell due, or (b) the company became unable to pay its debts as a result of the transaction. Where the company entered into the transaction with a person 'connected' with the company (excluding an employee), conditions (a) and (b) are presumed to be satisfied, unless the contrary is shown.

Unfair preferences voidable in certain circumstances6

This provision which already existed in the corporate regime legislation is concerned with payments that prefer one creditor unfairly over another during the period before the commencement of winding up. However, unhelpfully, it operated by reference to the equivalent provision for unfair preferences in the Bankruptcy Ordinance. It has now been made a standalone provision for corporate insolvency.

In the context of this provision and the new corporate provisions for transactions at an undervalue (see above), the amending legislation has also clarified some definitional issues under the prior regime; specifically in relation to the meaning of who is a person 'connected' with, and an 'associate' of, a company for the purposes of the length of the look back period prior to the commencement of the winding up when examining prior transactions.7

A company gives an unfair preference to a person if (a) that person is (i) one of the company's creditors, or (ii) a surety or guarantor for any of the company's debts or other liabilities, and (b) the company does anything or permits anything to be done which has the effect of putting that person into a position which, in the event of the company going into insolvent liquidation, will be better than the position that person would have been in if that thing had not been done.

The liquidator will have the right to apply to the court for an order to set aside the preferential payment:

  1. if it is given to a person who is 'connected' with the company (excluding an employee) at a time in the 2 year period before the winding up commences;8 Or
  2. in any other case of an unfair preference (which is not a transaction at an undervalue), at a time in the 6 month period before the winding up commences. Again, the court has a range of orders at its disposal which are generally intended to enable it to restore the entity to the original position as if the transaction had not taken place.

A continuing issue in practice with this provision is the requirement that the liquidator must demonstrate to the court that in deciding to give a creditor an unfair preference, the company was influenced by a desire to prefer that creditor over another. In circumstances in which a company is financially stressed, it can be very difficult for a liquidator to demonstrate this 'desire' e.g. where a payment is made to a firm of accountants to retain their services during a time of financial stress.

Floating charge – potential invalidity

This provision already existed in the corporate regime legislation and addressed the validity of a floating charge granted close to the time of the commencement of winding up. It has been strengthened and clarified by expanding the types of consideration that a company may receive for giving the floating charge, to prevent invalidity, and by introducing a longer claw back period prior to the commencement of the winding up for a person 'connected' with the company.

It provides that if a company creates a floating charge on its undertaking or property in favour of any of the following persons, the charge will be invalid except to the extent of the value of consideration received by the chargor company for its creation if:

  1. in the case of a person connected with the company, the charge was created within the 2 year period before the winding up commenced; or
  2. in any other case, the charge was created within the 12 months period before the winding up commenced, and the company was unable to pay its debts at that time, or became unable to pay its debts as a result of the transaction under which the charge was created.

The consideration referred to will be the value of any money paid to or at the direction of the company, or property or services supplied to the company, at the same time as or after the creation of the charge.

Other Phase 1 Amendments

Streamlining the winding up process

The amending legislation introduced a wide range of other provisions aimed at streamlining the winding up process. The following are some of the highlights.

Voluntary winding up of company by the directors

Under a special procedure the directors of a company have the power under the corporate insolvency regime to place the company into insolvent liquidation (a creditors' winding up). The intended purpose of this procedure is to give to the directors the power to wind up the company and to appoint a provisional liquidator with effect from the commencement of the winding up, thereby accelerating the appointment process in an emergency case. Meetings of creditors and shareholders must then be convened within 28 days of the commencement of the winding up. A majority of the directors' may pass a resolution to commence the winding-up of the company, if they have formed an opinion that the company cannot by reason of its liabilities continue its business. A winding-up statement must then be filed with the Registrar of Companies, at which time the winding up will commence. Safeguards to address concerns that this 'fast tracking' process to appoint a liquidator might be subject to abuse were introduced by restricting the powers of the provisional liquidator appointed by the directors. Whilst the provisional liquidator will have the same powers as a liquidator in a creditors' voluntary winding up, aside from certain powers stated in the legislation,9 the provisional liquidator will now be required to obtain the sanction of the court to exercise his powers.

Liquidator not absolved from liabilities arising from the liquidator's misfeasance or breach of duty or trust

Provisions similar to those in the UK insolvency regime concerning the liabilities of a liquidator have been adopted to enhance the regulation of instances of misfeasance or breach of duty or trust by a liquidator notwithstanding his/her release by the court. Whilst a liquidator may have obtained a court order releasing him/her from office once the winding-up has been completed, interested parties including a creditor or contributory will now be entitled to apply to the court for leave to take legal action against the liquidator after the liquidator's release. This provision is intended to address possible delinquency of a liquidator during the performance of his/her duties.

Streamlining the committee of inspection (COI)

The COI may be appointed by the court in a compulsory liquidation following the determination of meetings of the creditors and contributories of the company. The purpose of the COI is that of supervising and giving directions to the liquidator during the course of the winding-up. Various changes have been made to the procedures surrounding the COI to improve their workings, and these include:

  1. setting the COI's minimum and maximum numbers of members at three and seven. This is subject to variation by a court order on the application of the liquidator;
  2. dispensing with the requirement that the COI should meet at least monthly if the COI failed to set a time for a meeting, and instead providing that it should meet as and when determined by the liquidator;
  3. (c) altering the provisions for filling vacancies on the COI, such that a vacancy need not be filled if the liquidator and a majority of the continuing members agree that, having regard to the position in the winding-up, it is unnecessary for the vacancy to be filled, and the total number of the continuing members does not fall below three (or the minimum number ordered by the court); and   (d) providing for COIs to conduct their meetings remotely (e.g. by video conference) and to make decisions through written resolutions.

Regulatory measures for liquidators and provisional Liquidators

The Phase 1 amendments also strengthen regulation under the winding-up regime by setting out more clearly the powers, duties, the basis for determining remuneration, tenure of office of a provisional liquidator in a court winding-up, the termination and resignation of a provisional liquidator.

Phase 2 Amendments

Given the scale of the changes overall and some political contentiousness connected with some of the amendments, the Government divided the process of making these amendments into two distinct phases. The two major pieces intended to be dealt with in Phase 2 are these:

Provisional supervision

This would create a formal turnaround and rescue regime. Currently, Hong Kong has only a liquidation regime (with rescue being provided through the provisional liquidation route – which was not designed for this purpose – at times combined with schemes of arrangement). The likely framework for provisional supervision (when it appears) is that it could be initiated by a company or its directors or provisional liquidators or liquidators, but not the company's creditors. It would give to the debtor company a moratorium period during which civil proceedings against the company would be stayed, thus giving valuable time to the provisional supervisor to work towards a possible turnaround of the business whilst freed up from the threat of creditor action. Provisional supervision could be used in the case of both a locally incorporated company and a non- Hong Kong company registered under the Companies Ordinance.

Insolvent trading

Hong Kong's insolvency regime has no provision for insolvent or wrongful trading.10 This would make directors and senior management personally liable for the debts of a company which traded while insolvent. The goal of this provision would be to encourage the directors and senior management to initiate provisional supervision much earlier in time, to raise the chances of salvaging the business before a liquidation. The liquidator would be empowered to apply to the court to seek a declaration that a 'responsible person' was liable to the company for insolvent trading at the time it went into liquidation.

It is very much hoped that both of these proposals will arrive on the statute book in the form proposed by the Government. Both would represent a great leap forward, and a significant catching up of the insolvency regime with other legal regimes in Hong Kong. The time for implementing these changes is now long overdue.


1 The corporate winding-up regime, which follows a creditor (rather than debtor) oriented approach, was last subject to major overhaul in 1984. The Government had sought to enact a statutory corporate rescue procedure involving a process of provisional supervision through the Companies (Corporate Rescue) Bill 2001, but owing to a range of concerns raised by members of the Legislative Council which included the question of addressing outstanding entitlements of employees, it was not passed into law.

2 A payment out of distributable profits or the proceeds of a fresh issue of shares for the purpose of the redemption or buy-back, falls outside of this provision.

3 This contains a statement to be made by directors that having inquired into the company's state of affairs and prospects and taken into account all the liabilities of the company (including contingent and prospective liabilities), the director has formed the opinion that (a) immediately after the transaction in question, there will be no ground on which the company could be found to be unable to pay its debts; and (b) (i) if it is intended to commence the winding up of the company within 12 months after the transaction date, the company will be able to pay its debts in full within 12 months after the commencement of the winding up; or (ii) in any other case, the company will be able to pay its debts as they become due during the period of 12 months immediately following the transaction date.

4 Formerly, a liquidator could only challenge a transaction at an undervalue on the basis of, inter alia, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty etc. by a director, and seek restitutionary relief to unwind the transaction.

5 This provision was also drafted with reference to the UK Insolvency Act 1986.

6 Previously referred to as a 'fraudulent preference'.

7 The concept of 'control' of a company has been introduced and is satisfied if (i) any or all of the directors of the company, or of another company which has control of it, are accustomed to act in accordance with that person's directions or instructions; or (ii) that person is entitled to exercise, or control the exercise of, more than 30% of the voting power at any general meeting of the company or of another company which has control of it.

8 This assumes that the unfair preference is not also a transaction at an undervalue. If it were such a transaction, then it would be dealt with as such, rather than as an unfair preference, resulting instead in a five year look back period.

9 These are (a) to take into the provisional liquidator's custody, or under the provisional liquidator's control, all the property and things in action to which the company is or appears to be entitled, (b) dispose of perishable goods and other goods that are likely to diminish in value if not immediately disposed of, and (c) do anything that may be necessary to protect the company's assets.

10 The offence of fraudulent trading exists in the current regime, but the courts have consistently been reluctant to make a declaration for civil liability in the absence of dishonesty.

Hong Kong's Insolvency Regime: A Time Of Change

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions