India:
Summary Judgment: A Robust Tool To Curb Unnecessary Trial
14 November 2018
LexOrbis
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
With more than Twenty Seven million cases pending in the
subordinate Courts across the country, there is a need to look
beyond the traditional methods. Without exploring new techniques,
it will not be possible to ensure sound and efficient progress of
cases in Courts. At the international conference on
"Initiative to Reduce Pendency and Delay in Judicial
System" Justice Mishra, the Chief Justice of India, spoke
about the immense pendency of cases in Indian Courts and
recommended various measure to tackle the same, specifically,
highlighting the need for timely disposal of cases.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration from India
Should Courts Modify An Arbitral Award?
ZBA
One of the long-standing issues concerns the power of courts to modify an award in proceedings under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("Arbitration Act") dealing with applications for setting aside an arbitral award.
Autonomy Of Arbitral Tribunals And Admissibility Of Documents
Mandala Law Offices
When a review petition is dismissed by the highest court of the land – the Supreme Court, all does not come to an end. The Supreme Court in true exercise of its supreme powers grants one last constitutional remedy – the curative petition.