India: Entire Agreement Clause: Founders Be Aware!

Last Updated: 23 May 2019
Article by Krrishan Singhania and Srishti Singhania

An entire agreement clause aims to ensure that all the terms and conditions governing the rights and obligations of the parties are set out in a single contractual document, superseding all prior negotiations and agreements. The goal of such a clause is to prevent contracting parties from relying upon statements or representations made by them during negotiations for the purposes of claiming that they had agreed to something different than what is stated in the contract at the time of a dispute. A standard entire agreement clause may read as under:

"This contract contains the final and entire agreement and understanding between the Parties and is the complete and exclusive statement of its terms. This contract supersedes all prior agreement and understandings, whether oral or written, in connection therewith."

However, entire agreement clauses have become "boilerplate" clauses which are often inserted into contracts as a matter of routine and which are neither negotiated nor considered much by the contracting parties. Contracting parties usually ignore or are unaware of the unforeseen and unintended consequences of these clauses. These clauses come into question when a dispute arises between the parties with respect to the terms of the contract.

We have seen the interpretation of the entire agreement clause coming up when the parties have entered into multiple agreements and there are contradictions in the clauses of the latest agreement and the prior agreement and the latest agreement may supersede the prior agreement by virtue of entire agreement clause even though the parties may not have foreseen/intended such a scenario. For example, in case of start-ups, the founders of a start-up enter into a founders' agreement and thereafter upon getting investments enter into a shareholders' agreement with the investor. Many a times both the shareholders' agreement and founders' agreement cover the same subject matter that is restrictions on share transfer, governance and management, exit clauses etc. and sometimes both these agreements have contradicting provisions. In such a situation , the shareholders' agreement may supersede the founders' agreement by virtue of the entire agreement clause and this sometimes affects the rights and obligations of the founders amongst each other as well. Thus, under this article we aim to analyse the effectiveness and limitations of the entire agreement clause and suggest drafting tips to safeguard the interests of the contracting parties.

Impact on admissibility of extrinsic evidence

The general rule is that the entire agreement clause excludes parties to lead any oral evidence to prove the terms of the contract1 since the parties have by the entire agreement clause expressed their intention that the document is to contain all the terms of their agreement2and this supports the rule of parol evidence as per Section 92 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 ("IEA")3. However, there are certain exceptions to this general rule. When the contract does not contain all the terms between the parties and the contract is silent with respect to the other terms then the parties may lead oral evidence of their negotiations to help interpret or supplement the contract4. However, these other terms must not be inconsistent with the written contract.5 Further, extrinsic evidence may be lead to explain ambiguities on the face of the contract, but not in cases when the clauses in the contract are unambiguous.6

Extrinsic evidence may also be admissible for the purpose of interpretation of terms of the contract, even though the contract may have an entire agreement clause. In the case of Proforce Recruit Ltd v. Rugby Group Ltd.7, the Court of Appeal held that by incorporating the entire agreement clause the parties intended to exclude extrinsic evidence for the purpose of ascertaining the contents of a contract or setting up a collateral or side contract, but not for the purpose of ascertaining the meaning of a contractual term by referring to prior representations, agreements, negotiations and understandings between the parties. In this case an employment agency entered into a contract with a customer for supplying labour personnel and cleaning equipment. During the fixed period of the contract, the employment agency would have "preferred supplier status" with respect to the customer. However, the contract did not define the term "preferred supplier status". A dispute arose when the customer contracted with another agency for labour needs and the Court had to determine the meaning of "preferred supplier status". In such a situation, the Court of Appeal relied upon extrinsic evidence to interpret the undefined term, even though the contract had an entire agreement clause. Even though admissibility of extrinsic evidence for interpreting the terms of a contract will depend upon the facts of the case, one cannot exclude extrinsic evidence for the purpose of interpretation just because the contract contains an entire agreement clause.

Further, extrinsic evidence is admissible when the validity of the contract is in question itself. Section 92 proviso (1) of the IEA substantiates this rule and provides that oral evidence will be admissible to show that a contract is void or voidable either by reason of fraud or duress or illegality of the subject-matter.8Oral evidence is also admissible to prove fraudulent misrepresentation.9 Thus, an entire agreement clause will not impact admissibility of extrinsic evidence when it comes to proving liability of a contracting party for misrepresentation or for proving un-enforceability of a contract.

Implied terms

The general rule is that an entire agreement cannot exclude terms implied by custom or usage. This is also supported by the principle laid down under proviso (5) of Section 92 of the IEA. A trade usage or custom is so well know and properly understood with reference to the business that the parties are presumed to have their contract with tacit reference to it and intended to be governed by it even though a party may not be actually aware of the custom or usage10. However, evidence of a custom or usage cannot be admitted to vary or contradict the contract either expressly or by implication.11

Furthermore, the courts have also, in certain exceptional cases, held that the entire agreement clause can exclude terms implied by custom or usage.12 However, it is important to carefully read the wordings of the entire agreement clause to ensure that it was the intention of the parties to exclude implied terms. In the case of Exxonmobil Sales and Supply Corporation v. Texaco Limited13, the entire agreement clause expressly stated that the contract contained the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter and terms implied by usage were not incorporated into it.


The entire agreement clause does not have any impact on rectification and allows parties to lead extrinsic evidence to show that a clause was missed out and that the contract ought to be rectified.14This is in consonance with the law laid down under Section 92 proviso (1) of the IEA as well. Oral evidence can be admitted for correcting typographical errors, genuine and accidental mistakes such as incorrect description of properties15 but it cannot be admitted for changing the entire contract.16However, it is open to the Court to allow oral evidence of mutual mistake of fact to vary the terms of a contract.17Further, oral evidence is also admissible in case the mistake is due to innocent misrepresentation.18

Prior Agreements

The entire agreement clause indicates that the agreement records all rights and obligations of the parties in toto. If any other terms and conditions were agreed between the parties prior to entering into the present contract then the parties were free to record such prior terms and conditions in the present agreement19. Thus, the entire agreement clause, as a general rule, supersedes all prior agreements which have not been expressly incorporated in the present agreement. In the case of Neelkanth Mansions and Infrastructutes Private Limited and Ors. v. Urban Infrastructure Ventures Capital Limited and Ors.20, the Bombay High Court did not admit oral evidence and held that as the shareholders' agreement did not refer to any terms of the supplemental agreement by virtue of the entire agreement clause the entire subject matter agreed between the parties was contained only in the shareholders' agreement.

However in certain cases, prior agreements may prevail even though the present agreement contains an entire agreement clause due to the doctrine of estoppel by convention.21The doctrine of estoppel by convention means that a party is "estopped" from arguing that a contract is not altered by the conduct of the parties, even though the contract contains an "entire agreement" clause.

In the case of Mears Ltd. v. Shoreline Housing Partnership Ltd.22, Mears entered into a contract for repair and maintenance of the several thousand properties operated by Shoreline. However, it was only six months after Mears started working for Shoreline that the repair and maintenance contact was finalized. For the six-month period before signing of the final contract, Mears was paid on the basis of composite rates. However, the final contract had a clause, which stated that, a schedule of rates (which was different from the composite rates) would operate retrospectively even for the said six-month period. Towards the end of the six-month period, Shoreline withheld some £300,000 from Mears and claimed that Shoreline had to pay Mears on the basis of the schedule of rates and not the composite rates and had been overpaying Mears for the six-month period. While Shoreline took the defense of the entire agreement clause in the final contract, Mears alleged estoppel by convention. The Court held that the entire agreement clause did not exclude the doctrine of estoppel of convention, either by its express wording or by way of interpretation. As the parties shared an assumed state of facts and acted upon the same for the six-month period before the contract was finalized, it was wrong to allow Shoreline to enforce the terms of the final contract and avoid its pre-contractual obligations.

Conclusion: Drafting tips!

Some drafting tips to ensure that the interest of the contracting parties is safeguarded are as follows:

  • Expressly mention what the parties want to include and exclude from the contract. For example, in case the contracting parties want to rely upon the pre-contractual statements or representations then they should specifically include it in the contract itself.
  • In case the contracting parties want to exclude any implied terms of custom or usage from governing their legal relationship under the contract, they should explicitly mention the same.
  • In case the parties intend to rely upon any prior agreements they should incorporate these prior agreements in the latest contract so that the prior agreements are not excluded by the entire agreement clause.
  • It is also important to incorporate business practices, which differ from the terms of a long-term contract, when restating or amending such long-term contracts which contain an entire agreement clause. For example, if the parties have accepted the practice of issuing an invoice after 30 days even though the contract states 15 days then when amending the contract the parties should change the terms of the contract else it can be argued that the parties do not want to rely upon their business practice of 30 days by virtue of the entire agreement clause.

In conclusion, it is important not to consider the entire agreement clause as a boilerplate clause, but to consider the wording of this clause carefully. Drafting such a clause with clarity and precision and with appropriate professional help will avoid frivolous and counter-productive litigation and also protect the founders or promoters from any hardships.


1. Martin D. Fern, WARREN'S FORMS OF AGREEMENTS – BUSINESS FORMS, Vol. 5, 1997, Mathew Bender & Co., S. 101.1.01.

2. CHITTY ON CONTRACTS, Vol. 1, 27th ed., 1994, Sweet & Maxwell, 1994, p. 606.

3. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board v. N. RajuReddiar AIR 1996 SC 2025.

4. Chimanram V. Divanchand v. Diwanchand ILR 56 Bom 108.

5. Id.

6. Bellefonte Re-Ins. Co. v. Argonaut Ins. Co. 581 F. Supp. 241 (S.D.N.Y. 1984).

7. [2006] WL 2794075, paras. 41 and 59 (Court of Appeal).

8. Cutts v. Brown, ILR (1880) 6 Cal 328, 338.; Harmesh Kumar v. Maya Bai, AIR 2006 P&H 1, 8, para 23.

9. Balaramireddigari v. ThippaReddi AIR 1949 Mad 301.

10. ManaVikram v. Rama Pathar ILR 20 Mad 275; Ram Deo v. Firm Birdhichand Sumermal ILR (1970) 20 Raj 427.

11. Mahindra and Mahindra v. Union of India AIR 1979 SC 798.

12. Exxonmobil Sales and Supply Corporation v. Texaco Limited [2003] EWHC 1964 (Comm).

13. Id.

14. JJ Huber (Investments) Ltd. v. Private DIY Co. Ltd. [1995] E.G.C.S 112.

15. RikhiramPyarelal v. Ghasiram AIR 1978 MP 189.

16. Gujurat Electricity Board v. S.A. Jais& Co. AIR 1972 Guj 192.

17. Supra note 4.

18. Id.

19. Neelkanth Mansions and Infrastructutes Private Limited and Ors. v. Urban Infrastructure Ventures Capital Limited and Ors., Commercial Arbitration Petition No. 13 of 2017, Bombay High Court, decided on 7th December 2018.

20. Id.

21. Mears Ltd. v. Shoreline Housing Partnership Ltd. [2015] EWHC 1396 (TCC).

22. Id.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions