Ireland: Can Lyons V Longford Westmeath Education And Training Board Already Be Distinguished On Its Facts?

Last Updated: 11 August 2017
Article by Bryan Dunne and Niall Pelly

The recent decision of the High Court in the case of Lyons v Longford Westmeath Education and Training Board is being closely watched by employers about to engage in internal investigations.  In that case, the High Court held that the right to fair procedures and natural justice (which includes the right to legal representation during meetings and the right to cross-examine witnesses) applies at the preliminary investigation stage where the matter is sufficiently serious that it may warrant dismissal.

It has been generally accepted that the principles of fair procedures and natural justice need not apply to investigations that do not involve any findings of fact, but do apply to inquiries which can make formal findings.  In Lyons, a key distinguishing factor may be that the external investigating body issued a report of its findings and formally decided upon the bullying allegation made against Mr Lyons.

Two further decisions of the High Court on the issue of fair procedures during investigations were issued shortly after the Lyons decision.  They do not refer to Lyons, but they do reinforce the generally accepted principle that fair procedures do not apply in full at the preliminary investigation stage, assuming the investigation is not the final decision on the allegations, and may provide some support for distinguishing the Lyons decision on the facts particular to that case.

E.G. v The Society of Actuaries in Ireland

The first is a decision of McDermott J in the High Court made on 16 June 2017 in the case of E.G. v The Society of Actuaries in Ireland.  This was a case involving an allegation of professional misconduct made against the applicant, a member of the Society of Actuaries in Ireland.  An Investigative Committee was appointed by the Society to determine (i) whether there was prima facie evidence of misconduct and (ii) whether to refer the matter to a disciplinary tribunal.

The Investigating Committee found there was prima facie evidence of misconduct by the applicant and referred the matter to a disciplinary tribunal.  The applicant argued that the Investigating Committee's finding of prima facie evidence of misconduct and the investigative process generally was in breach of the principles of natural justice and sought an order to set aside the Committee's determination.

Reliance was placed on the judgment of Edwards J in the High Court case of O'Sullivan v Law Society of Ireland [2009] IEHC 632, which was upheld by the Supreme Court, in particular his findings that the level of fair procedures and natural justice that applies at investigation stage depends on the actual nature of the investigation.  In that case, Edwards J ruled that if the investigation has the potential to result in the making of an adverse finding and / or the imposition of sanctions against the person under investigation, that person should be afforded fair procedures and natural justice appropriate to a formal disciplinary inquiry.  If, on the other hand, the investigation is a preliminary step and the investigator does not have the power to make findings or impose sanctions upon the subject, but it is merely a fact gathering exercise to determine if there is a basis for a disciplinary inquiry, then less formal procedures may be adequate and appropriate.

McDermott J was satisfied that the Investigating Committee was involved in an information gathering process which went no further than a decision as to whether there was a prima facie case of misconduct, which would then be finally determined by a disciplinary tribunal.  He was therefore satisfied that the full extent of rights, including in particular an opportunity to cross examine witnesses, was not required at the investigation stage and that the decision reached by the Investigating Committee was not in breach of fair procedures or natural justice.

Of relevance to the Court's decision was the fact that the Investigating Committee made no decision of a final nature against the applicant, nor imposed any sanction upon him.  This can be distinguished from Lyons where the bullying allegation was decided by the external investigator.

N.M. v Limerick and Clare Education and Training Board

Similar findings were reached by the High Court in the case of N.M. v Limerick and Clare Education and Training Board, a further judgment of McDermott J delivered on 27 June 2017.

This case concerned an application by a teacher for an injunction to restrain the continuation of any investigation or disciplinary process by the respondent in respect of allegations of sexual harassment and unprofessional conduct made against him.

An external investigator was appointed to conduct the investigation.  The terms of reference circulated outlined that the investigator would prepare a report setting out the findings of the investigation, "including findings of fact".

The case does not consider the applicant's right to legal representation at the investigation as the respondent conceded this at that stage.  It does, however, consider whether the applicant was entitled to the right to cross examine witnesses at the investigation stage.

The Court again considered the judgment of Edwards J in O'Sullivan v Law Society of Ireland and noted that a distinction must be drawn in the standard of fair procedures applicable to an investigation which is an information gathering exercise only.  On that basis, the Court was satisfied in this case that:

(a) the procedure set out in the terms of reference was fair and appropriate and that the applicant was not entitled to an opportunity to cross examine others at the investigation stage; and

(b)  even if it did involve an element of fact finding, the decision to be taken by the investigators could not be regarded as a "final or binding finding of fact" against the applicant.

It noted that the purpose of a disciplinary hearing is to ensure that principles of fair procedures and natural justice are observed in the final determination of the complaints.

Key take-away for employers

A notable difference between the above two cases is that, in the second case (N.M. v Limerick and Clare Education and Training Board), the employer went that bit further than in the first case in that the brief to the investigator was to make findings of fact,  However, it was still able to successfully defend the case on the basis that the investigator did not make any binding findings of fact against the teacher which could lead to the imposition of sanctions.

These two judgments provide further support for the point that where employers wish to avoid the full impact of Lyons,  any initial investigation should very clearly just be a fact gathering exercise to determine if there is a case to answer, before a separate disciplinary hearing that will decide if the allegations are proven or not.  Where, on the other hand, the investigator appointed will reach formal findings, the principles of fair procedures and natural justice will apply during that investigation process, which includes the right to legal representation and the right to cross examine one's accuser.

These two more recent cases are definitely helpful for employers as they support the view that the Court reached its decision in Lyons because the external investigating body made a formal determination on the bullying allegation at the investigation stage.  The one question, that still casts doubt over this view,  is Judge Eager's general comment in Lyons that even though most employers don't build fair procedures into the investigation stage, they should be doing so.  Until we have a High Court decision that directly addresses Lyons, we will not know for certain how the High Court will deal with this point going forward.

Helpfully, the Court also reiterated that during an internal investigation, it is inevitable that a decision maker and investigator will have some form of communication about the issues or involvement at the initial stages and that they cannot be "hermetically sealed" which is a useful point for those in senior management and in HR who are involved in overseeing such processes.

For more detail on Lyons and these two judgments, see episodes 26 and 27; episode 27 will follow in the coming days on the Matheson Employment Law Podcast Series.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions