Turkey: Last 3 Years For Turkish Competition Authority: What Does The Data Say?

Last Updated: 2 May 2019
Article by Sahin Ardiyok, Evren Sesli and Ramiz Arslan

Agency effectiveness is of critical importance for antitrust enforcement to reach its main goals, the well-functioning market economy and the welfare of consumers arising from a competitive environment. After all, if it were not for the effective agency implementation, the rules that are protecting the competition are meek as lambs. Impartial and effective antitrust enforcement brings fair and reasonable ground that the players may carry out their operations with clarity before the law. For that matter, the predictability and continuity of antitrust enforcement is vital for the welfare of consumers and smooth functioning of economic system. At the same time, antitrust enforcement is expected to keep up with the developments in the dynamic markets that it oversees. Hence, while being unpredictable poses the risk of scaring free market players, worn out precedents also disconnects the governors of the law from the governed.

The paper examining the antitrust agency effectiveness in Netherlands by Annalies Outhuijse from University of Groningen raised the examination idea of this article1. In its paper, Outhuijse found that the appeal rate for decisions of the national competition authority (The Authority for Consumers and Markets – ACM) is significantly high, as well as the rate of annulment of such decisions. The paper then discussed the effectiveness of the ACM, as well as the fittingness of the annulment decisions of courts. For that purposes, we have analysed the track-record of the Turkish Competition Authority (TCA) from its published decisions concerning competition violations. In this analysis, we left out the decisions concerning misleading statement allegations, re-examination pleas, interim measures, requests to examine case files, with focusing on preliminary investigations and full-fledged investigations in the past 3 years concerning the allegations on competition violations (violations of Articles 4 and 6 of the Turkish Competition Act). It shall be noted that each case has its own merits and the data derived from the TCA's decisions are just to be assessed from general standpoint.

First of all, the TCA has rendered 59 final decisions in full-fledged investigations in the past 3 years, with 20 of these being in 2018, 16 in 2017, and 23 in 2016. The rate of the decisions including a competition violation and imposing administrative fine is 37% between 2016 and 2018. However, this rate is increased to 45% in 2018 from 31% in 2017.

On the other hand, all of the decisions which are made public in preliminary investigations concludes with the decision on not to open a full-fledged investigation. Since the preliminary investigation decisions that initiate an investigation are considered as internal memorandum by the TCA, and such decisions are not to be made public.

Dissenting opinions

According to the Article 52 and 53 of the Competition Act, members of the Competition Board may oppose to the decisions taken by majority of the votes with stating their dissenting opinions in the decisions. Dissenting opinions are of great value to competition law practice in general, since the parties and the public are able to follow up on different interpretations of the law. Also, in some cases, dissenting opinions are becoming valuable for parties who are appealing the decision to the administrative courts with stressing assessments from these dissenting opinions.

It is seen from the full-fledged investigations that the overall dissenting opinion rate for the past 3 years is 33%. The main takeaway from the key numbers is that the Competition Board members' practice of stating dissenting opinions is decreasing. Dissenting opinion rate in full-fledged investigations was 39.1% in 2016, 37.5% in 2017, and finally 25% in 2018.

Furthermore, the preliminary investigations are also showing a similar result. In the past 3 years, dissenting opinion rate happened around 9.8%. However, the rate was 17.5% in 2016, and dropped to 9.5% in 2017 and 2018.

It is also observable that the dissenting opinion rate is getting lower for a period following an appointment of a new member to the Competition Board. Such outcome is reasonable, since in most cases a new member is adhere to the general dictum and becomes accustomed to the TCA's precedents rather than challenging the status quo with writing dissenting opinions.

One may argue that the TCA is becoming more and more consistent with its precedents, and for that reason, the dissenting opinions are appearing less and less. However, such argument can be strongly challenged from two separate standpoint. First, we do not see a particular uniformity between the decisions of the TCA with regards to interpretations of the law. For example, in some cases the TCA found the conduct focused on resale price maintenance as strictly prohibited even if there was no success in maintaining the resale prices in the market while in other cases the TCA looked for success in such conduct for finding a violation. Hence, the argument that the TCA's precedents are becoming solid is not well grounded. On the other hand, competition law is perhaps the most dynamic field of law there is, since it is expected to adapt itself to constant changes in the markets. The very essence of overseeing markets requires so. Therefore, precedents may (and perhaps shall) change over time, and such fact is giving rise to the expectations of seeing dissenting opinions in the decisions of the TCA.

Annulment lawsuits

The Competition Act enables the challenging the decisions of the TCA before administrative courts. The parties to the investigations can follow that judicial procedure for the annulment of the TCA's decisions. The parties' willingness to appeal the decisions before the courts may also give some clues on the market players' trust in the effectiveness of the antitrust enforcement and the TCA's evaluations.

For the past 3 years, the rate of appealed decisions of the TCA is 40% for full-fledged investigations. This rate was 52.1% in 2016, and 56.2% in 2017. The appeal rate dropped significantly in 2018 to 15%, but such decrease may depend on the continuing appeal procedures, which are not reflected to the TCA yet.

The appeal rate of preliminary investigation decisions is at 14.2% for the past 3 years, and is considerably low when compared to full-fledged investigations. This rate was 24.5% in 2016, and decreased to 9.5% in 2017 and in 2018. Such decrease would indicate that the willingness of the complainants to appeal against the preliminary investigation decisions on not to open full-fledged investigation is getting lower.

It shall be noted that the data used for these evaluations are compiled from TCA sources, which are publicly available as of publishing of this article.


1. Annalies Outhuijse, The Effective Public Enforcement of the Prohibition of Anti-Competitive Agreements: Why Do Undertakings in the Netherlands Appeal?, University of Groningen Faculty of Law Research Paper Series No. 17/2018, May 2018.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions