In this weekly update, we summarise the most notable updates in the UK sanctions world. If you have any questions in respect of any of the developments set out below, please do not hesitate to contact a member of our London Global and Government Trade team listed above.above.

1. RUSSIA SANCTIONS

2. DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF KOREA SANCTIONS

  • UK Government updates one entry on the UK sanctions list under the Democratic People's Republic of Korea regime: On March 11, 2024, the UK Government updated the entry for "Ministry of the People's Armed Forces (MPAF)" on the UK sanctions list. The entry now refers to the "Ministry of National Defence", which is still subject to an asset freeze. (Notice_Democratic_People_s_Republic_of_Korea_110324.pdf (publishing.service.gov.uk)).

3. HAITI SANCTIONS

  • UK updates Haiti sanctions guidance: On 13 March, 2024, the UK updated its statutory guidance on the Haiti sanctions regime to reflect the coming into force of the Haiti (Sanctions) (Amendment) Regulations 2024, which update the arms embargo against Haiti in accordance with UNSCRs 2699 (2023) and 2700 (2023). ( Haiti Sanctions: guidance - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)).

4. OTHER SANCTIONS

  • UK introduces new export controls on emerging technologies and amends existing export controls: On March 12, 2024, the Export Control Joint Unit ("ECJU") published a Notice to Exporters announcing updates to the Export Control Order 2008 ("the 2008 Order") and the Council Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 ("the assimilated Dual-Use Regulation"). Among other things, the updates introduce new controls on semiconductor technologies and certain other "emerging" technologies, with effect from 1 April 2024. (NTE 2024/04: The Export Control (Amendment) Regulations 2024 - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)).
  • UK Supreme Court hears appeal in RTI Ltd v MUR Shipping BV: On 6-7 March, 2024, the UK Supreme Court heard an appeal in RTI Ltd ("the Respondent") v MUR Shipping BV ("the Appellant"), a case that concerns the reliance of a party on a force majeure clause to suspend its contractual obligations on the basis that US sanctions prevented payments in US Dollars. The force majeure clause in the contract required the party affected by force majeure to exercise reasonable endeavours to overcome it. An arbitration tribunal who originally heard the issues found that accepting the payments in Euros was a realistic alternative to paying in US Dollars, and so the appellant's case on force majeure "failed because it could have been overcome by reasonable endeavours from the party affected". The High Court allowed an appeal against the arbitral tribunal and held that accepting payment in Euros rather than US Dollars would not be included within "reasonable endeavours". The Court of Appeal subsequently reversed the High Court's decision by a majority. The Supreme Court has not yet given judgment in the case. (RTI Ltd (Respondent) v MUR Shipping BV (Appellant) - The Supreme Court).

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global services provider comprising associated legal practices that are separate entities, including Mayer Brown LLP (Illinois, USA), Mayer Brown International LLP (England & Wales), Mayer Brown (a Hong Kong partnership) and Tauil & Chequer Advogados (a Brazilian law partnership) and non-legal service providers, which provide consultancy services (collectively, the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are established in various jurisdictions and may be a legal person or a partnership. PK Wong & Nair LLC ("PKWN") is the constituent Singapore law practice of our licensed joint law venture in Singapore, Mayer Brown PK Wong & Nair Pte. Ltd. Details of the individual Mayer Brown Practices and PKWN can be found in the Legal Notices section of our website. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of Mayer Brown.

© Copyright 2024. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.