The media storm surrounding an Anonymity Injunction (or Super Injunctions as they are referred to in the press) secured by a footballer to prevent the publishing of revelations about his private life has brought into sharp focus the future of privacy laws in England & Wales.
It has also focused attention on the duties and obligations of specialist media firms to provide advice in relation to the potential PR impact of certain legal procedures, such as Anonymity Injunctions.
The fall out from an Anonymity injunction can evidently create a far bigger story than would have been the case had the revelations the Injunction is designed to keep secret simply been published. The difficulties of policing Anonymity Injunctions in the world of multi and social media and as a result of the ability of media outlets outside of the jurisdiction to publish what they want to publish highlight the potential importance of specialist PR advice.
This raises an interesting question as to how far media firms are obliged to go when advising their clients. Whilst we now have the benefit of hindsight, it is nevertheless not difficult to foresee how the situation arose. The jurisdictional prob
lems were always there, but the prospect of users of a social media website, such as twitter, taking matters into their own hands does, on the face of it, seem to be an entirely possible scenario. As a consequence, specialist media firms inevitably assume the responsibility of managing the PR side of this process, as well as the day to day legal and procedural responsibilities. Due consideration to the potential fall out from certain legal procedures would also fall within this widened scope of advice.
There is an increasing expectation on firms generally to consider not just their client's specific legal requirements but the wider business (and indeed personal) implications of what they are trying to achieve. From a media perspective, the prospect that the duty of care extends past legal advice into the PR arena is entirely feasible, particularly when the circumstances were foreseeable. It is an issue that should be borne in mind by media firms and their insurers.
The contents of this article are intended as guidelines for clients and other readers. It is not a substitute for considered advice on specific issues. Consequently, we cannot accept any responsibility for this information or for any errors or omissions.
Thomas Eggar LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under registered number OC326278 whose registered office is at The Corn Exchange, Baffin's Lane, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1GE (VAT number 991259583). The word 'partner' refers to a member of the LLP, or an employee or consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications. A list of the members of the LLP is displayed at the above address, together with a list of those non-members who are designated as partners. Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. Lexcel and Investors in People accredited.
Thomas Eggar LLP is not authorised by the Financial Services Authority. However, we are included on the register maintained by the Financial Services Authority so that we can carry on insurance mediation activity which is broadly the advising on, selling and administering of insurance contracts. This part of our business, including arrangements for complaints and redress if something goes wrong, is regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. The register can be accessed via the Financial Services Authority website. We can also provide certain further limited investment services to clients if those services are incidental to the professional services we have been engaged to provide as solicitors.
Thesis Asset Management plc, our associated financial services company, provides a comprehensive range of investment services and advice. Thesis is owned by members of Thomas Eggar LLP but is independent of and separate to it. No lawyer connected with Thomas Eggar LLP provides services through Thesis as a practicing lawyer regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. Thesis is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Thesis has its own framework of investor protection and professional indemnity cover but Thesis clients do not enjoy the statutory protection of solicitors' clients.
