UK: No Extension of Time for Buyers to Commence FOSFA Arbitration Under Section 12 Arbitration Act 1996

Last Updated: 16 June 2010
Article by Daniel Jones and Reema Shour

(1) SOS Corporacion Alimentaria SA (2) Mataluni Spa v Inerco Trade SA [2010] EWHC 162 (Comm)

Background To Dispute

This dispute arose out of the industry wide contamination of Ukrainian sunflower oil with mineral oil in 2008. Following an urgent alert by the European Commission on 30 April 2008, the European authorities recommended the withdrawal of contaminated goods to safeguard consumer health.

In the present case, the buyers of certain cargoes of Ukrainian sunflower seed oil commenced FOSFA arbitration proceedings against the sellers for contamination of the cargoes. The sale contracts incorporated the standard form FOSFA 54, Rule 2 of which specifies certain time limits for commencing FOSFA arbitration including a time limit of 21 days from discharge for quality/condition claims. Rule 2(d) provides that where the claimant does not comply with these time limits and the respondents raise the non-compliance as a defence, then claims are deemed to be waived and absolutely time-barred unless the FOSFA arbitrators, umpire or Board of Appeal determine otherwise in their absolute discretion.

The cargoes in question were loaded prior to the EU alert and the testing at loadport did not include analysis for mineral oil. When the buyers became aware of the industry wide contamination, they focussed on recalling all products as had been recommended and testing all stocks to determine which had been affected. By the time that they commenced FOSFA arbitration to recover their financial losses in respect of the oil that was found to be contaminated, the time limits specified under Rule 2 of FOSFA 54 had been missed. Nonetheless, the FOSFA arbitrators exercised their discretion under Rule 2(d) to allow the claims to proceed.

The sellers appealed to the FOSFA Board of Appeal which reversed the decision of the First Tier Tribunal and held that the buyers' claims were time barred.

The buyers made two applications to the court. Firstly, they applied under section 12 of the Arbitration Act 1996 (the "Act") for an extension of time to commence arbitration. Secondly, they applied for permission to appeal against the FOSFA arbitration awards pursuant to section 69 of the Act, which relates to appeals from arbitration awards on a point of law.

Commercial Court Decision

Mr Justice Hamblen dealt first with the application for permission to appeal under section 69 of the Act because if that application was dismissed, it would follow that the FOSFA Appeal Board's exercise of its discretion to hold that the claims were time-barred was lawful and not open to challenge and that might be relevant to the exercise of the court's discretion under section 12 of the Act. Alternatively, if the court were to allow the appeal, then it might decide to remit the issue of a time extension to the FOSFA Appeal Board, in which case the section 12 application would have to be postponed pending the outcome of the arbitral process.

The judge stated that the circumstances in which the court will find that the arbitrators have exercised their discretion unlawfully are likely to be rare. The FOSFA Board of Appeal had exercised its discretion not to grant the buyers a time extension to commence arbitration. The Board was unimpressed with the buyers' explanation for their delay. In the present case, the Judge concluded that the buyers had not demonstrated that the FOSFA Appeal Board's decisions were open to serious doubt or that they revealed any error of law. The section 69 application was, therefore, dismissed.

Turning to the section 12 application, the buyers had argued that the risk of sunflower oil contamination by mineral oil was not a recognised risk in the industry prior to the Ukrainian sunflower oil scandal in mid 2008 and was not generally tested for by sunflower oil traders. They alleged that there was no industry standard method of testing for this type of mineral oil at the time that the contamination was discovered and it was only in direct response to the problem which was discovered in 2008 that the relevant authorities introduced a standard method of testing with effect from August 2008. Consequently, the buyers maintained that at the time of contracting, the parties would not reasonably have contemplated that the sunflower oil might be contaminated by a substance which was not recognised as a usual or likely potential contaminant and which had likely been deliberately and fraudulently added (although not by the sellers).

Mr Justice Hamblen highlighted the fact that the test for making a successful application for a time extension under section 12 was more stringent than that under its predecessor, section 27 of the Arbitration Act 1950. Under section 27, the court had been permitted to grant an extension of time if failure to do so would have resulted in undue hardship. Under section 12 of the Arbitration Act 1996, undue hardship would not be sufficient and time would be extended in exceptional circumstances only. Section 12(3) provides that the court should only make an order to extend time for commencing arbitration if (a) the circumstances were outside the reasonable contemplation of the parties when they agreed the time limit in question and it would be just to extend the time or (b) the conduct of one party makes it unjust to hold the other party to the strict terms of the time limit.

The judge said that the relevant factors that he needed to take into consideration in deciding whether to exercise his discretion under section 12 were: the length of the delay; whether it was due to the claimants' fault; if so, the degree of fault and whether either party would suffer prejudice if the discretion were not exercised. However, any prejudice suffered by the buyers as a result of the time bar was of no great weight because this was matched by the prejudice to the sellers in losing a good defence to a substantial claim.

The judge accepted the buyers' evidence that the mineral oil contamination had not been a recognised risk within the industry at the relevant time and that the parties could not reasonably have contemplated such contamination. However, in respect of one of the claims, the contamination had been established 8 days prior to the expiry of the time limit, yet the buyers had not taken the relevant steps to protect their position in due time. In respect of the other claims, the buyers had delayed in commencing arbitration even after they had become aware of the contamination and were in a position to put in a claim notice. In the judge's view, the buyers' failure to commence arbitration as soon as they became aware of the contamination involved a high degree of fault. In his opinion, they were also guilty of culpable delay even after being put on notice that the sellers were relying on the time bar.

The judge rejected the buyers' argument that they had not known of the relevant time limits for claiming FOSFA arbitration until they had been made aware of these by another company in the same group for whom the oil had originally been purchased. He stated that the buyers should have been familiar with the terms of the contracts they had made and the time bars they contained. The buyers were a well established international producer and distributor of vegoils and had a legal department which was actively involved in dealing with the contamination issue. They should therefore have been well aware of the rather fundamental practice of contractual time limits for bringing claims relating to goods in international contracts for the sale of goods governed by Trade Association terms, including FOSFA. In the circumstances, the judge did not consider that the buyers' failure to comply with the FOSFA time limit could be said to involve circumstances beyond their reasonable contemplation.

The judge therefore dismissed the section 12 application.

Comment

Section 12 of the Arbitration Act 1996 contemplates that an extension of time for commencing arbitration can be obtained from the court in cases where there is already an arbitral process for seeking such an extension, so long as any available arbitral process for obtaining a time extension has been exhausted. However, as Mr Justice Hamblen stated in this case, such cases "are likely to be rare". The applicant would have to show that it was not an "ordinary case" and that there was a good reason why it would be just to extend time notwithstanding the contrary decision of the chosen arbitration tribunal.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions