UK: Battle Of The Forms - GHSP Inc v AB Electronic Ltd [2010] EWHC 1828 (Comm)

Last Updated: 12 May 2011
Article by Ian Woods

This case involves the familiar scenario in commercial contractual relations known as a "battle of the forms". This is the situation where two parties negotiating a contract submit a series of offers each subject to their own terms and conditions. An acceptance expressed as being subject to different terms to the original offer constitutes a counter offer, which is not capable of concluding a contract. This means that when the contract is finally performed the question remains: on what terms and conditions?

This particular case involves a sale and purchase agreement between the claimant buyer ("C"), a designer and manufacturer of electro-mechanical control systems, and the defendant seller ("D"), a manufacturer of electrical components. The contract was for the sale and purchase of a pedal sensor to be incorporated into an electronic throttle pedal for use in Ford motor vehicles. In 2006 a defective batch of sensors led to vehicles suffering from stumbling engines and uncontrolled reduced acceleration. The losses suffered were significant, however, prior to determining issues of liability and quantum a preliminary issue was ordered to be determined as to whether the contract was concluded on the C's terms and conditions or the D's terms and conditions.

The facts involved a number of purchase orders ("PO") and an acknowledgment of order ("AO") before the contract was finally performed and the goods delivered. The first PO was provided by the C on the 2 November 2004, this expressly referred to the C's terms and conditions and was acknowledged by the D but only to the extent that this was a "kick-off" order with more details to be confirmed such as the schedule and the exact specification of the product. On the 18 November 2004 C sent a new PO with a new engineering drawing, this was also expressed as being subject to C's terms and conditions and was followed by a supplier's schedule on the 23rd November 2004 expressed as subject to the C's terms and conditions. On the 3rd December 2004 C asked D for confirmation that it would be shipping against the PO of 18 November 2004 and on the same day D sent an AO to C which contained on the reverse D's terms and conditions. The contract was then subsequently performed.

C argued that the first PO provided on the 2nd November 2004 had been explicitly accepted by D's email of the 3rd November 2004 acknowledging the "kick-off order". Alternatively, C argued that the first PO and/or PO on the 18th November 2004 had been implicitly accepted by D's conduct during the course of November. Conversely, D argued that neither PO had been accepted until the AO on the 3rd December 2004 which was subject to their terms and conditions. C had not rejected this AO and in accepting deliveries had concluded the contract on D's terms and conditions.

In his judgment Mr Justice Burton identified the main issues as being whether the contract incorporated as terms either:

  1. the terms and conditions of C's PO;
  2. D's terms and conditions; or
  3. some other terms and conditions, if so which.

A number of well known authorities on this point were cited and in particular the words of Lord Denning MR in Butler Machine Tool Co Ltd v Ex-Cell-O Corporation (England) Ltd [1979] 1 WLR 401 at 404H ff:

" most cases when there is a "battle of the forms", there is a contract as soon as the last of the forms is sent and received without objection being taken to it ... the difficulty is to decide which form, or which part of which form, is a term or condition of the contract. In some cases, the battle is won by the man who fires the last shot. He is the man who puts forward the latest terms and conditions: and if they are not objected to by the other party, he may be taken to have agreed to them ... There are yet some cases where the battle depends on the shots fired on both sides. There is a concluded contract but the forms vary. If...they are mutually contradictory...then the conflicting terms may have to be scrapped and replaced by a reasonable implication."

The judge went on to cite authority on the principle that in English law acceptance can often be implied through conduct including the act if performing the contract. However, the judge referred back to the case of Butler as authority for the principle that acceptance by the buyer of a delivery form the seller may not be sufficient, referring to Lawton LJ (at page 406G to H):

"It cannot be said that the buyers accepted the counter-offer by reason of the fact that ultimately they took physical delivery if the machine, they had to make it clear by correspondence that they were not accepting [the plaintiff's conditions]"

The judge referred also to Lidl (UK) GmbH v Hertford Foods Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 938 which held in principle that another option was that the parties had concluded a contract which did not incorporate either party's terms.

In reaching a conclusion the judge referred to a large amount of factual witness evidence provided by the two parties' representatives and their correspondence, this elicited that the matter of terms and conditions had been raised a number of times prior to the conclusion of the contract. The relationship between C and D commenced in November 2003 when D was invited to provide a quote on C's terms, D provided C with a quote on their terms and stated that a cap on liability was needed. C's representative clearly referred to C's standard terms and noted that any exceptions would need to be "documented and agreed upon in a contract". D carefully reviewed C's terms and there was a proposal between the parties to reach a written compromise agreement between the two companies. In evidence C accepted that he was told by D that they did not find C's terms at all acceptable but stated that he was waiting for their suggested amendments. In March D indicated that they would not want to sign C's conditions as they stood and proposals were put forward for amendment. C's representative sent an agenda for a working party meeting to come to an agreement, the meeting was scheduled for the end of March but was cancelled by D.

Ultimately the judge found that the contract was finally concluded when D accepted C's schedule on 3rd December 2004. However, he was satisfied that the contract was not concluded on wither party's terms and conditions due to the lack of consensus. The judge had not been charged with determining which implied terms and conditions applied in this case as the parties had already agreed that the implied terms as set out in the Sales of Goods Act 1979 would apply if neither party's terms were found to apply.

The concern here is that the court may all too readily find, where a situation of a "battle of the forms" arises, that a contract was not concluded on either party's terms choosing to rely on statutory implied terms instead. However, it does appear that in the present case there was a large amount of factual evidence to suggest that both parties had extensively and comprehensively voiced their concerns over the inappropriateness of each other's terms and conditions to the extent that it was clear that any contract concluded would not be on either set of terms. In our view it remains the case, therefore, that if the parties are tacit over whose terms and conditions are to apply the 'last shot' rule will continue to govern the dispute of the "battle of the forms".

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions