After some delay, the Fixed Term Employees (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations will now come into force on 1 October 2002. These Regulations provide that employees who are employed on a fixed term contract basis are not to be treated less favourably than permanent employees who are engaged in similar or broadly similar work. This requirement applies to pensions as well as other terms and conditions of employment and effectively covers all workers other than those employed on a very casual basis, those employed through agencies, apprentices and government training scheme employees.

In order to assess whether a fixed term employee is being treated less favourably, it is necessary to compare his or her terms of employment with those of an appropriate permanent employee. The comparison should be with an employee who is employed by the same employer and who is engaged in the same or broadly similar work, who has similar qualifications and skills and who works in the same establishment. Where there is no suitable comparator in the same establishment, a comparator who works for the same employer at another establishment should be used.

The Regulations do, however, allow fixed term workers to be treated differently where it is "objectively justified", and provide that there will be objective justification where the terms of the fixed term employees’ contract, when taken as a whole, are at least as favourable as the terms of a comparable permanent employees’ contract of employment. The objective justification exception therefore allows a degree of flexibility as it means that fixed term workers’ benefits can be considered as a package rather than requiring employers to provide fixed term workers with benefits that are identical to those that their permanent counterparts enjoy. The Regulations also make provision for certain fixed term employees to be deemed to be permanent where they have four or more years’ continuous employment under successive contracts. There may, however, be reasons why employees are not deemed to be permanent in these circumstances, for example where the relevant provision under the Regulations has been disapplied under a collective agreement, or if continued fixed term employment can be objectively justified.

Comment

If your pension scheme excludes non-permanent employees, you should be reviewing the position now, and considering whether to offer all employees, (whether fixed term or permanent), the same pension benefits. Any such review should be considered in the context of the overall benefits package of the fixed term worker, and the appropriateness of any action taken to comply with the Regulations will be dependent on the particular circumstances that apply to your business, the benefits currently provided and your human resources policy.

Member-nominated trustees arrangements

The Government has decided not to proceed (for the time being) with implementing the changes to the member-nominated trustee and director requirements contained in the Child Support, Pensions and Social Security Act 2000. In the meantime, it has issued draft Regulations extending the life of existing employer opt-out arrangements by another three years (under existing Regulations the employer opt-out arrangements had to expire after six years, this will now be nine years). Although the draft Regulations extend the lifespan of existing employer arrangements without the need for any action by the trustees or employer, they provide that employers can propose new arrangements at any time, so long as the trustees agree. Approval for any proposals made after the Regulations come into force will be limited to three years.

© Herbert Smith 2002

The content of this article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

For more information on this or other Herbert Smith publications, please email us.