In May this year the court considered in Hearn & ors v Younger & ors whether a resolution by the trustees to improve the rate of pension increases under the scheme, with the approval of the company, from 3% to 5%, without expressly stating that the improved rate of increase applied only to excess over GMP, had the effect of amending the rules to allow guaranteed annual increases on the whole of the pension, including the GMP element, after State Pension Age.

The court also considered whether the trustees and the company were bound to amend the rules to allow for the increase to GMPs as a result of representations made to scheme members in the scheme booklet and other communications.

The Judge, having considered all the evidence, concluded that the trustees and company had not amended the rules of the scheme to guarantee pension increases of 5% on the whole of a member’s pension including the GMP element. The evidence put before the court indicated that the trustees’ decision concerned pension increases on pensions in excess of the GMP element only.

The Judge also concluded that none of the documents put before the court contained a clear and unambiguous representation that the fund would guarantee the level of pension increases on the whole of the pension including the GMP element.

Comment

The case shows the importance of ensuring the accuracy of statements made in scheme booklets and other employee communications. Having said that, it also shows the difficulty for scheme members in bringing claims based on statements made in scheme booklets, in view of the member’s need to establish reliance on the statement and financial loss as a result of that reliance.

The case is also a reminder that trustee decisions must be properly and accurately recorded. The case is also of general interest because scheme booklets commonly contain statements suggesting that the State scheme will make up any increase in GMPs in payment to full RPI. This, however, is not the position where the GMP exceeds the corresponding SERPS entitlement at State Pension Age. It was decided in this case that such a statement did not affect liabilities under the scheme because any misrepresentation contained in the scheme booklet was about the State scheme and not about the scheme itself.

Model administration agreement published

The PMI has recently published a model administration agreement designed to be used where external administrators are appointed. Although containing many standard provisions, it is also designed to be tailored to allow for particular circumstances and issues and is therefore a good starting point for trustees and advisers who are negotiating or reviewing their administration agreements. It can also be tailored to cover the situation where administration is not carried out externally, but is operated by the sponsoring employer. In these circumstances, legislation and best practice do now require some form of written agreement setting out the terms.

© Herbert Smith 2002

The content of this article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

For more information on this or other Herbert Smith publications, please email us.