UK:
What Does the Proposed UK Company Tax Reform Mean for the Real Estate Sector?
01 October 2002
by
Herbert Smith Freehills
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
Over the summer the UK financial press gave
considerable coverage to the proposals published by the Inland Revenue
in August for major reform of the UK corporate tax regime. In this
briefing we look at the implications of the measures for different
entities active in the UK real estate sector.
What is proposed?
The changes will only apply to companies. The key proposals are:
- All profits from the sale of land, buildings, equipment and
shares in property investment companies to be taxed as income in line
with the accounting treatment, rather than under the current capital
gains tax regime. This means, in particular that the allowance for
inflation (known as indexation allowance) would be abolished.
- All other profits and costs associated with land and buildings
will also be taxed or relieved as income in accordance with the
accounts. This will mean that, from 2005, when UK listed companies
will be obliged to adopt international accounting standards,
revaluations of real estate assets may become taxable.
- Tax relief for depreciation to be given in accordance with the
amounts and rate at which the expenditure is written down in the
accounts, rather than under the existing system of capital allowances.
- Streamlining the categorisation of income and expenses for tax
purposes, which may accelerate the use of tax losses.
- Closer alignment of the tax treatment of property investment
companies and their shareholders with the more favourable tax regime
which applies to trading companies and their shareholders. This may
include, for example, extending the new exemption for corporate
disposals of substantial shareholdings, currently limited to trading
companies, to property investment companies. It could also include
extending more favourable capital gains tax taper relief treatment to
individual shareholders in property investment companies. However, the
document does indicate that the favourable rules are unlikely to be
extended to "passive" investment companies or their
shareholders.
How will the changes affect exempt funds?
The changes will have no effect on exempt funds because exempt funds
are not taxed on their return from real estate investments.
Life companies?
The consultation document recognises that life companies need special
consideration by virtue of the special tax regime which applies to them.
Very little detail is given at this stage. However, the document does
expressly state that the proposed tax treatment of gains might be
inappropriate for life companies or may at least require modification.
Property investment companies?
Property investment companies are potentially the worst affected
entities in the real estate sector:
- The loss of indexation allowance may significantly increase the
taxable profit on the sale of an interest in real estate, particularly
where the land has been held for a long period. This may be tempered
to some extent by the introduction of a “rollover” relief, which would
allow the tax on a sale to be deferred, provided the sale proceeds are
re-invested in land and buildings or plant and machinery.
- A system of depreciation allowances based on the accounts rather
than the specific tax rules giving capital allowances for the cost of
fittings is likely to have the effect of reducing the allowances which
a company can claim in computing its tax liability. Currently,
property investment companies claim capital allowances for expenditure
on plant and machinery, which includes much of the fit-out cost of a
development. However, for accounting purposes, fit-out costs are not
generally separated from the land itself. As a result, the cost of
fittings is not separately depreciated in the accounts.
- Where accounting rules require revaluations to be taken to the
profit and loss account, revaluations will be taxable at this point.
Current UK accounting rules do not require revaluations by property
investment companies but international accounting standards do. From
2005, all UK listed companies will be required to comply with
international accounting standards. This means that listed property
companies may be taxed on increases in value of investment properties,
regardless of whether the property has been sold.
On a slightly more positive note:
- The proposal to streamline the categorisation of income for tax
purposes may permit earlier use of tax losses for the following: UK
companies with both UK and overseas property interests and UK
companies which carry on both a property investment business and a
separate trade, whether or not property related. It is possible that
this change may also accelerate the use of capital losses made on the
sale of real estate.
- The closer alignment of the tax treatment of investment companies
and trading companies may also be beneficial to property investment
companies and their shareholders as it may extend the availability of
certain reliefs. See final bullet point under “What is proposed?”
above.
Property dealing companies?
The impact of the proposals on property dealing companies is likely
to be minimal, given that their returns on real estate dealings are
already taxed as income rather than capital. As a result, the changes to
capital gains indexation allowances and depreciation allowances should
have no effect. The relaxation of the loss relief rules may allow
property dealers who also carry on another activity (e.g. property
investment) to access tax losses earlier.
Non-UK residents?
The consultation document makes no explicit reference to
non-residents and this makes it difficult to be definitive in this area.
However, the proposals could potentially have a serious impact on
non-residents investing in the UK. Currently most non-residents are not
subject to UK tax on the sale of UK investment land and buildings. By
contrast, non-residents are generally taxed on UK source income. The
proposal to tax gains as income could therefore for the first time
expose non-residents to a UK tax charge on the sale of UK land and
buildings.
|
What is the timing of these changes?
A transitional regime for the move to an accounts-based system of
taxing capital assets is clearly contemplated. The document suggests
that companies which acquire assets on or after the commencement date
for the new regime would be taxed under the new rules in respect of
those assets. Assets already held on the commencement date would
continue to be taxed under the existing capital gains regime, unless the
company marks the asset to market. This means that companies with
long-term interests in land and buildings may be subject to a long
transitional period, with compliance cost implications.
The Inland Revenue has indicated that major changes will not be
introduced until 2004 at the earliest. Currently it appears that
priority is being given, first, to the rationalisation of the
categorisation of income, second, to taxing capital assets as income and
third, to aligning the treatment of trading and investment companies.
Overall, the document is short on detail in many places, particularly
on the implications for life companies and for non-residents.
Consultation with business and other interested parties is likely to
continue into 2003 and the proposals will almost certainly be refined as
a result.
|
© Herbert Smith 2002
The content of this article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as such. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
For more information on this or other Herbert Smith publications, please email us.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Tax from UK
All Change For Non-doms
Lubbock Fine
Although there had been speculation in the run up to the Spring Budget that the Chancellor was set to steal Labour's proposals to 'abolish non-dom status', the actual announcements from Jeremy Hunt...
Tax – A Shake-Up Looms
Herbert Smith Freehills
Few developments in the tax world have an impact on a truly global scale, but the so-called 'Pillar Two' rules – essentially a global minimum corporate tax – is one of them.
UK Tax Round Up
Proskauer Rose LLP
Welcome to March's edition of our UK Tax Round Up. This month has seen a number of interesting cases covering a range of issues, from the deductibility of costs against employment income...