UK: The Astra: Single Hire Default Entitles Owners To Withdraw And Claim Loss Of Profit For Remaining Charter Period

Last Updated: 24 April 2013
Article by Fionna Gavin and David Richards

Kuwait Rocks Co v. AMN Bulkcarriers (Astra) [2013] EWHC 865 (Comm)

A Commercial Court judge has decided that a failure to pay hire under an NYPE charterparty amounts to a breach of condition, entitling a ship-owner to terminate and seek damages. This goes against the previous view generally held in the market that the obligation to pay hire under a time charter as it falls due is not a condition such that, if an owner wants to recover its future losses following a termination, it must seek to bring the charter to an end for repudiatory breach of contract, the latter invariably involving a series of consecutive defaults by the charterers.

The Court also considered whether the arbitrators had correctly applied the law on repudiatory breach and whether an addendum to the charter, stating that if the time charter was terminated the owners would be entitled to recover future loss of earnings, constituted a penalty clause.

The background facts

The Astra was chartered on an amended version of the NYPE 1946 form dated 6 October 2008 for a period of five years. Under Clause 5 of the NYPE form, a charterer is required to pay hire in advance and "failing the punctual and regular payment of hire... the Owner shall be at liberty to withdraw the vessel...". The charterparty also contained an anti-technicality provision which required the Owners to give the Charterers two banking days' notice of a failure to make a hire payment.

After the commencement of the charter, the market continued to decline and the Charterers found they could not employ the vessel at a profit. On various occasions, the Charterers sought a reduction in the hire rate and threatened that, if the Owners did not agree, then they would liquidate the company. In July 2009, the Owners agreed to reduce the hire rate for one year and the parties entered into an addendum to the charter. Amongst other things, the addendum recorded that "In the event of the termination or cancellation of the Charter by reason of any breach by or failure of the Charterers to perform their obligations, Charterers shall... pay to the Owners compensation for future loss of earnings...". This was referred to in the judgment as the "Compensation Clause".

Even after the addendum was agreed, the Charterers continued to insist on further reductions of hire. When the Charterers failed to remit the hire payment due for August 2010 on time, the Owners withdrew the vessel from the Charterers' service and terminated the charterparty. The Owners then claimed their future loss of earnings for the remainder of the charter period in arbitration, arguing that: (i) the Charterers were in breach of condition in not paying hire on time and, alternatively: (ii) their conduct was a renunciatory/repudiatory breach of the charter.

The arbitrators' decision

As to the first argument, the arbitrators found that, whilst their instinct as commercial arbitrators would be to treat the obligation to pay hire on time as a condition, they were not persuaded that the current state of English law reflected this view. They stated that the generally accepted position under English law is that a failure to pay hire is not a breach of condition.

On the second argument, the arbitrators determined that the Charterers' conduct evinced an intention no longer to be bound by the charterparty and therefore there was a renunciation of the charter. While the late payments were not evidence of renunciatory conduct, the repeated threats by the Charterers that they would declare bankruptcy unless the Owners agreed to adjust the hire rate, compounded by the failure to honour the compromise reached in July 2009 (when the Owners agreed to reduce the hire rate) could be interpreted as an intention by the Charterers not to perform the charter in a manner consistent with its terms.

The Charterers obtained permission to appeal on two questions. First, whether evincing an intention to perform a contract in a way which is inconsistent with its terms, but which does not deprive the innocent party of substantially the whole benefit of the contract, is capable in law of amounting to a renunciation. Second, whether the obligation under the Compensation Clause to compensate the Owners for their loss of earnings following a termination of the charter amounted to a penalty clause.

The Owners obtained permission to appeal from the arbitrators' decision that a failure to pay hire did not amount to a breach of condition entitling an owner to terminate and claim damages.

The Commercial Court decision

Breach of condition

The most significant question considered by the Court was the Owners' contention that the requirement to pay hire was a breach of condition. Mr Justice Flaux reviewed in detail the various previous cases which, over the last 100 years or so, have touched upon the question of whether a failure to pay hire amounts to a breach of condition as opposed to a breach of an innominate term. (A breach of an innominate term only entitles an innocent party to terminate the contract where the breach is sufficiently serious, whereas a breach of condition entitles the innocent party to terminate a contract regardless of the severity of the breach).

It was clear from the review of the authorities that the arbitrators were right to say it has been widely recognised that, as a matter of English law, a breach of the obligation to pay hire does not constitute a breach of condition. In particular, in The Brimnes, the Commercial Court decided that Clause 5 of the NYPE form was not an essential term of the contract and so did not amount to a condition. In The Kos, both Mr Justice Smith in the Commercial Court and Lord Sumption in the Supreme Court stated that the general view is that a failure to pay hire when it is due is a breach of an innominate term and not a breach of condition.

Having reviewed the authorities, however, Mr Justice Flaux came to the view that Clause 5 of the NYPE form is a condition of the contract such that any breach entitles an owner to terminate the charter and seek damages. The following salient points arise from the judgment:

1. The Owners argued that the decision in The Brimnes could be distinguished because of the inclusion of an anti-technicality clause in the subject charter (which was not found in the charter in The Brimnes). Mr Justice Flaux agreed, but also went further than this and decided that, even without an anti-technicality provision, Clause 5 of the NYPE form was a condition.

2. The decision gives rise to an obvious question as to whether an owner can terminate immediately following a failure to pay hire in full or whether they must wait until the anti-technicality notice period has expired. This question may be particularly relevant where an anti-technicality clause only refers to the owner's right to exercise its contractual right to withdraw. Mr Justice Flaux's judgment in The Astra suggests that an anti-technicality clause constitutes a grace period for the payment of hire and, therefore, an owner can only terminate a charter for breach of a condition requiring the payment of hire where such grace periods have expired.

3. It had previously been considered that, so far as this issue required further clarification, this would need to be done by the Supreme Court, given that it was thought the point had already been decided by the Commercial Court in The Brimnes (in a judgment upheld by the Court of Appeal). By deciding that Clause 5 of the NYPE form by itself is a condition, Mr Justice Flaux's judgment directly conflicts with the earlier decision in The Brimnes. Mr Justice Flaux made it clear that he was prepared to refuse to follow the decision in The Brimnes because: (i) it conflicted with later statements by higher courts on the same issue and; (ii) it was based on a decision (in The Georgios C) which had been overruled in a subsequent case (The Laconia). Mr Justice Flaux did not consider he was bound by the Court of Appeal decision in The Brimnes because the point had not been considered at that level. Even so, it seems that this issue will only be settled if and when the Supreme Court has a chance to look at the point.

4. Mr Justice Flaux had already decided to uphold the arbitrators' decision on another ground (see below in relation to the renunciation argument). His decision regarding a breach of condition could therefore be viewed as obiter and not binding in future cases. That said, Mr Justice Flaux was only prepared to acknowledge that his decision on the point might be considered "academic" and an alternative view is that the case is one determined on a number of grounds. Therefore, the status of the judgment on this point is open to debate.


The Owners had succeeded in the arbitration by showing that the Charterers had repudiated the charter. The Charterers argued in the Commercial Court that the arbitrators had applied the wrong test in this regard because they had failed to consider whether the Charterers' conduct was substantially inconsistent with the party's obligations.

Mr Justice Flaux determined that the arbitrators had not made an error. On the evidence, the arbitrators were entitled to conclude that the Charterers were determined to perform the charter in a manner which deprived the Owners of the substantial benefit they should have obtained from further performance and that this breach went to the root of the contract.

Penalty clause

Mr Justice Flaux had little problem dispensing with the argument that the Compensation Clause was an unenforceable penalty clause. He agreed with the Charterers that the reference to "any breach" in the Compensation Clause should be read as meaning any repudiatory breach or breach of condition. That being the case then, in providing that upon a termination the Owners were entitled to recover their loss of earnings, the Compensation Clause only reflected the losses the Owners could claim in a falling market following a termination of the charter.


For the reasons set out above, the status of the decision that the obligation to pay hire under a time charter amounts to a condition is not free from doubt. It will be necessary to see if the case reaches the higher courts on an appeal and how subsequent cases treat the decision. In the meantime, owners may wish to remain cautious when dealing with their charterers' failure to pay hire on time or at all.

The immediate impact is likely to be that arbitration tribunals and/or first instance judges may be more prepared to follow what the arbitrators in this case described as their commercial instinct, i.e. to find that a single failure to pay hire does entitle an owner to terminate the charter and claim damages.

If the decision in The Astra does indeed represent the position under English law on the question of whether a failure to pay hire constitutes a breach of condition, then it will change the balance of power between owners and charterers in a falling market. In the past, owners may have been reluctant to exercise their withdrawal rights where this might mean they could not recover damages for the losses they would suffer when re-fixing the vessel at a lower rate. In such circumstances, owners would have to wait and make a difficult decision as to exactly when charterers' conduct has constituted a repudiatory breach. Given this dilemma, many charterers may have had an expectation that they could miss several hire payments before they were at risk of facing a withdrawal and a damages claim. Such an approach is now fraught with considerably greater risks.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions