UK: New Decision: Is Failure To Pay Hire A Breach Of Condition?

Last Updated: 9 May 2013
Article by Nick Austin, Ed Mills-Webb and Leon Alexander

On 18 April 2013, Mr Justice Flaux handed down judgment in Kuwait Rocks Co v AMN Bulkcarriers Inc (The "ASTRA") [2013]. The case considers whether a charterers' failure to pay hire is a breach of a condition which entitles owners to cancel the charter, and claim damages for the unperformed part. The Judge's detailed decision is likely to have significant practical consequences for those within the industry, and in particular those with extant early redelivery disputes.

The Facts

Charterers hired the vessel on an NYPE 1946 Form for five years from 6 October 2008. The charter contained the standard clause 5 wording:

"Payment of said hire to be ... 30 days in advance ... failing the punctual and regular payment of the hire ... the Owners shall be at liberty to withdraw the vessel from the service of the Charterers, without prejudice to any claim they (the Owners) may otherwise have on the Charterers".

Following the significant drop in freight rates at the time, charterers were unable to sub-charter the vessel at a profit so owners agreed a hire reduction for a defined period. When that period expired, the charterers requested a further period at a reduced rate, this time threatening that if agreement could not be reached they would declare bankruptcy. Owners agreed, and an addendum to the charter was issued that reduced the daily hire rate for a fixed period, following which the full charter rate would be payable once again.

After expiry of the fixed period, charterers continued to pay the reduced sum, and not the full charter rate as agreed. Owners held charterers in breach, gave them two days to remedy the breach (pursuant to the "anti-technicality clause"), and when charterers failed to do so, owners withdrew the vessel.

Owners commenced arbitration, claiming USD13 million, being the difference between the market and the full hire rate for the two years and three months remaining on the charter.

The Arbitration

The Tribunal considered:-

1. Was charterers' conduct tantamount to a "renunciation" or "repudiation" of the charterparty (the "Repudiatory Breach")? And

2. Were charterers in breach of condition in not paying hire punctually (the "Breach of Condition")?

For Repudiatory Breach, owners had to show that, by their words or conduct, the charterers evinced an intention not to perform the contract, which a reasonable person would regard as clear and absolute. It would be sufficient if, taking into account the history of the contractual relationship, owners could show that charterers only intended to perform the charter in a way that was substantially inconsistent with their contractual obligations.

The Tribunal did not consider that late payment was itself sufficient, but when considered objectively, charterers' repeated threats that they would declare bankruptcy unless the hire rate was reduced, and their refusal to pay the full charter rate after the end of the fixed period were tantamount to Repudiatory Breach.

Accordingly, the Tribunal ruled in owners' favour and awarded damages of around USD12.5 million.

In relation to the alleged Breach of Condition, the Tribunal said that, whilst their instinct was to treat the obligation to pay hire as a condition, they were not persuaded that was the current state of English law. The Tribunal therefore adopted the "orthodox" view under English law that the punctual payment of hire is not a condition, and dismissed owners' claim. This was the position held in The "BRIMNES" [1973], and affirmed by the Court of Appeal. There is however some contrary "obiter dicta" (i.e. additional, non-binding judicial comments) in later decisions.

The Commercial Court's decision

The Judge considered that the Tribunal had applied the correct legal test for Repudiatory Breach, and that it had reached the correct conclusion. Accordingly, the Judge dismissed charterers' appeal.

This is the rationale of the Court's decision and, therefore, as a general principle, it is only this part of the decision that should be binding on arbitration tribunals, and subsequent Court judges (unless there is a cogent and convincing reason to do otherwise).

However, the Judge proceeded to deliver his judgment in relation to the Breach of Condition.

The Judge considered all the authorities on Breach of Condition, and formed the view that the obligation to make punctual payment of hire is a condition.

The Judge's view was:

1. The fact that clause 5 gives a right to withdraw the vessel is a strong indication that it was intended that a failure to pay hire promptly would go to the root of the contract

2. As time is made of the essence, it is consistent with the requirement being a condition

3. The "BRIMNES" can be distinguished as it is a decision where there was no anti-technicality clause making time of the essence – however, the Judge stated that he would still have refused to follow the decision due to obiter dicta in subsequent decisions, and the fact that one of the authorities relied upon in The "BRIMNES" has now been overruled; and, perhaps most importantly

4. The importance to businessmen of certainty in commercial transactions – an owner needs to know whether he can withdraw the vessel and claim damages or whether he should persevere with his inconsistently performing charterers

What does this mean?

This decision is slightly problematic as the question as to what an owner should now do when presented with a defaulting charterer is perhaps less clear than before.

The reason for this is that the decision is, strictly speaking, obiter, as it was not the rationale for dismissing charterers' appeal, and it does not therefore have to be followed by subsequent courts. It may well be that if the issue comes before a different Commercial Court judge (perhaps on appeal from an arbitral tribunal), the Court may elect to follow the orthodox view.

However, LMAA (London Maritime Arbitrators Association) Tribunals may be bound, and are likely to consider themselves obliged to follow the decision in the first instance.

Irrespective of whether the decision is binding, it is definitely contrary to the position that has been adopted in the industry to date – that a failure to pay hire punctually is not a breach of condition, and that more is needed to show a Repudiatory Breach.

This may have considerable implications as whilst the case is in relation to the NYPE Form, the Judge's reasoning goes wider, and will impact the proper interpretation of most commonly used time charterparties. The Judge's comments may even apply where there is no anti-technicality clause.

The decision is slightly surprising as the Judge relied upon obiter comments in non-time charterparty cases (such as the shipbuilding disputes, Stocznia Gdanksa SA v Latvian Shipping Co [2002] and Stocznia Gdanska v Gearbulk Holdings Ltd [2009]), whilst rejecting reliance on the obiter statement of Lord Sumption in the Supreme Court's decision in The "KOS" [2012], which was a time charter case, on the basis that the relevant issue was not in dispute. In The "KOS", Lord Sumption stated:

"The second consequence is that any failure on the part of the charterers to pay hire when it falls due will not of itself entitle the owners to damages representing the loss of the bargain or the expenses of termination simply because the owners respond by withdrawing the vessel. This is because the non-payment does not itself destroy the bargain or occasion the expenses, unless in the circumstances it is a repudiation which owners have accepted as such"

Whilst obiter, this appears to be an indication of the Supreme Court's view on the question of whether a failure to pay hire punctually is a condition.On a final point, whilst the decision raises more questions for owners faced with non-paying charterers, it may assist decision-making owners in one situation. In The "AQUAFAITH" [2012], the Court held that when charterers repudiate the contract, for example by seeking to redeliver early, owners can decide whether to accept the repudiation, and claim damages, or affirm the contract, and continue to claim payment of hire at the full charter rate. This still presents owners with a difficulty: if they affirm charterers' repudiation (for example because they consider that charterers are good for the money or they are looking for alternative employment for the vessel), then they could lose their right to terminate at a later date if charterers remain silent and simply refuse to pay hire. However, for the time being at least, if owners are evaluating whether to accept a charterers' repudiation or affirm the charter whilst looking for alternative employment, they may take some comfort in knowing that they may still be able to argue, later, that the next failure to pay an instalment of hire by charterers could be a breach of condition entitling them to exercise their right of withdrawal and to claim damages.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions