UK: Court Of Appeal - Checking The Spiralling Costs Of Claimants’ Solicitors?

Last Updated: 24 January 2007
Article by Danielle Singer and Adrian Cottam

The rules relating to Conditional Fee Agreements ("CFAs") entered into post 1 November 2005 have now been relaxed. A distinction has to be drawn between CFAs entered into after this date, when the CFA (Revocation) Regulations apply, and those entered into prior to that date when the old regulations apply and where technical challenges are still possible.

Pre 1 November 2005

The paying party should check the CFA and ask detailed questions as to whether the claimant’s solicitor has complied with the rules.

Did they undertake a reasonable investigation into the possibility that the client has before-the-event ("BTE") insurance? In deciding what questions should be asked by the claimant’s solicitor, the Court of Appeal in Myatt v National Coal and Garrett v Halton Borough Council (2006) gave some useful guidance as to the extent of the inquiry required. It will depend on the circumstances, including:

  • the nature of the client – does he have a real knowledge and understanding of insurance matters?;
  • the circumstances in which the solicitor was instructed (did they meet the client?);
  • the nature of the claim – is it likely that a standard insurance policy will cover it?;
  • the cost of the ATE premium; and
  • if the claim had been referred to solicitors on a panel, the fact that the referring body has already investigated the question of the availability of BTE.

In Myatt, the solicitors failed to ask the correct questions or to investigate sufficiently whether or not the client had a BTE policy in existence. Although there was no BTE which would provide cover for the claim, this was held to be a material breach of the regulations (there does not have to be actual prejudice suffered) and the CFA was unenforceable.

Similarly, enquiries should be made to ensure that the solicitor has informed the client if he had an interest in recommending a particular ATE insurance. The Court of Appeal held in Garrett that if a solicitor is obliged to recommend a particular insurance product as a result of being a member of a panel, it is not sufficient to tell the client that the firm is on the panel. In this case, the solicitor failed adequately to explain what was involved in panel membership and its significance. This was held to be a material breach of the regulations and the CFA was unenforceable.

Is compliance with the regulations important?

If a CFA does not comply with the rules and is unenforceable then, under the indemnity principle, the defendant is not obliged to pay costs that would otherwise have been payable under the CFA.

The outcome of these appeals is of considerable importance, since thousands of CFAs were entered into before 1 November 2005 in respect of claims where costs have still to be resolved. Where there is a genuine concern that the regulations may not have been complied with, defendants can still raise technical challenges.

The courts will focus on the advice that was given by the solicitor and other relevant circumstances which existed at the date of the CFA, and make a judgement as to whether the departure from the requirement in question had a materially adverse effect on the protection afforded to the client.

Documents, or other evidence showing that the regulations have been complied with, should be requested by the paying party as soon as the costs are submitted for consideration, and before further costs of detailed assessment are incurred. A refusal or failure to disclose this evidence should be drawn to the costs officer’s attention.

Post November 2005

Since 1 November 2005, new regulations apply. To comply, a CFA must now be in writing and must specify the success fee (which must not exceed 100 per cent). Failure to advise a client on alternative funding arrangements and providing disclosure about having a financial interest in a particular insurance product is a breach of the Solicitors’ Practice Rules 1999. This is a matter between the solicitor and his client, and the CFA will still be enforceable.

What’s left ?

Challenges to CFAs under the new rules would seem to be restricted to arguments of the level of success fee and reasonableness of the ATE premium.

The ATE premium

For the first time since Callery v Gray (2001), the Court of Appeal has considered the reasonableness of ATE premiums in Rogers v Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council (2006). The fact that the ATE premium was large compared with the damages recovered did not necessarily mean that it was disproportionate. In this case, a premium of £4,860 was allowed where damages were agreed at £3,000.

The Court had no problem with staged premiums and indicated that a party who has an ATE insurance policy with staged premiums should inform the defendant of that, and should set out accurately the trigger moments when the second or later stages will be reached. This will allow defendants to consider tactically if, and when, to make settlement offers to avoid paying the later stage premium. If there is an issue over the size of a second or third premium, then the claimant’s solicitors will be expected to explain in a brief note, for the purposes of assessment, how they have chosen the particular ATE product and the basis on which the premium is rated – whether block rated or individually.

District judges and costs judges do not have the expertise to judge the reasonableness of a premium except in very broad brush terms. Challenges to small- or medium-size premiums will become more difficult.

Success fees

There is still very little judicial guidance on the appropriate level of success fees. The Court of Appeal in Callery gave guidance in 2001 on this issue, but there have been no other Court of Appeal decisions on the point. Callery established that the reasonableness of the success fee has to be assessed at the time the CFA was agreed. It is permissible for any CFA to include a twostage success fee, and this is to be encouraged. The Court cannot impose a two-stage success fee.


For pre-1 November 2005 CFAs, the conjoined appeals of Myatt and Garrett will be useful in challenging CFAs. If the claimant’s solicitor fails to comply with the regulations, no costs will be payable. Under the new rules, the possibility of such technical challenges are gone, and defendants are left with challenges to the level of success fees and ATE premiums. Paying parties will have to hope that the scope of predictive costs and fixed success fees are broadened to check the everincreasing costs of claimants’ solicitors. The Civil Justice Council is currently engaged in considering fixed success fees in public liability cases and to produce guidelines or fixed ATE premiums.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions