UK: UK Employment Round-Up - December 2016

Our Monthly Review Of Key Cases And New Law Affecting Employers
Last Updated: 6 January 2017
Article by Christopher Fisher and Louise Fernandes-Owen

Our Monthly Review Of Key Cases And New Law Affecting Employers



We are finishing 2016 with a rundown of some of the key cases since the summer.

The Mayer Brown Employment Group wishes you a very happy Christmas.

Shared Parental Leave: The first Employment Tribunal decision

Snell v Network Rail Infrastructure Limited

Mr Snell and his wife (both Network Rail employees) informed Network Rail that they wanted to take shared parental leave ("SPL") for their child. Network Rail's policy provided that partners/secondary adopters have 39 weeks SPL paid at the statutory rate, and 13 weeks unpaid leave, with mothers and primary adopters being provided for 26 weeks at full pay.

At the Employment Tribunal, the only issue remaining was on quantum, as Mr Snell had withdrawn his direct discrimination claim and Network Rail had admitted indirect discrimination (changing its SPL policy so that both the mother and father got shared parental leave at the statutory rate only). Mr Snell was awarded damages of over £28,000, which included an injury to feelings award of £6,000.

The importance of this case is to review your shared parental leave policy to ensure that it is drafted to set out clearly what type of leave the person is taking. Network Rail's policy had not differentiated between different types of parental leave. In fact, Mrs Snell had been on maternity leave, so the key point is to ensure that a family-friendly policy makes it clear what type of leave is being taken and, therefore, what the payment is for. Clarity should also be given to what period of entitlement is being paid for. Often, shared parental leave will be taken after a period of maternity leave has been taken. The policy should reflect that shared parental leave which is taken at, say, 22 weeks after birth is at week 22, and will not be recalculated as if it is starting at week one. If we can help to review your policy, please let us know.

Status and the "GIG" economy

Aslam, Farrar and others v Uber BV and others

This is a very current theme. A recent survey by Intuit suggested that, in the US, 40% of American workers would be independent contractors by 2020. There are a number of other cases waiting to be heard about independent workers and their rights.

This case turned on whether Uber drivers were "workers". The Tribunal concluded that Uber had sufficient control over the drivers to establish worker status and the drivers should be treated as workers whilst logged onto the Uber app. These periods of time would also qualify as working time under the Working Time Directive, with them being additionally classed as "unmeasured work" for the purposes of calculating national minimum wage requirements.

This is, in some ways, a surprising decision. Drivers own their cars, they are responsible for all running costs and are not required to wear a uniform. They do not need to work a minimum number of hours and the contract is between the driver and the passenger. Uber argues that its role was the provision of a technology platform which effectively enabled drivers to meet customers.

However, the Employment Tribunal analysed the relationship and said that the drivers had to drive a route set by the app as this calculated the fare that they would be paid. They were paid directly by Uber, who subtracted a service fee of 20% to 25% for them using the app. Uber also dealt with any complaints.

This is likely to be a "watch this space" area in the next few months.

Working Time Regulations: Workers have an automatic right to rest breaks without asking for them

Grange v Abellio London Limited

All workers with daily working time in excess of six hours are entitled to a rest break of 20 minutes.

In this case, the Claimant had originally worked eight and a half hours, with half an hour's rest. In practical terms, it was proving difficult for the Claimant to take that rest break as the job was a very busy one. The working day was changed to an eight hour day with no rest break, allowing workers to leave work half an hour earlier. The Claimant brought a claim, saying that he had been denied his entitlement to a rest break. The EAT decision made it clear that the onus was not on the worker to request a rest break. Instead, the onus was on the employer to provide one in order to give effect to the requirements of the Working Time Directive for rest breaks.

Therefore, where employers run businesses with very busy rosters, this case means that the onus is on the employer to roster in a rest break. We would suggest employers should also be reviewing the rosters to see what happens, in reality, to ensure that rest breaks are being taken.

DSAR: The elephant in the room

DB v GMC [2016] EWHC 2331(QB)

We often see DSAR requests which appear clearly to be brought to further the Applicant's anticipated litigation. In this case, the applicant wanted to see an investigatory report by the General Medical Council into an allegation of incompetence against a doctor. The investigatory report had concluded that no further action should be taken against the doctor. The doctor, understandably, did not consent to the report being disclosed as it contained personal data about him, and he thought it would be used to bring further litigation. The GMC thought it could disclose the investigatory report without the doctor's consent due to the requirements of disclosure under the Data Protection Act. The doctor brought a judicial review application against the GMC to prevent this happening.

The High Court said that there was a need for a genuine balancing exercise to be undertaken between the Applicant's right of access to information and, in this case, the doctor's right to his own privacy.

Each case will turn very much on its own facts, and you can appreciate here the sensitivities on both sides. The High Court went on to say that if an individual refuses to consent to the disclosure of their personal data, this is an important factor to take into account. If the sole or dominant purpose behind the DSAR is to get information for litigation, then this is a weighty factor against disclosure in circumstances such as this, where consent is not being given.

The ICO's own Code of Practice suggests that a DSAR must be honoured unless it would not have been made but for the desire to get information to be used in other legal proceedings, i.e. if the sole purpose of the DSAR is litigation. Therefore, in this case, the test has been widened to the sole or dominant purpose.

Whilst this decision is unlikely to provide a defence to a business against a well crafted DSAR, which identifies legitimate reasons for the request in addition to litigation, it is a development for business where there is a sensible balance which needs to be considered, and sensitive issues on both sides.

Disciplinary process: Where a former formal final written warning that was "manifestly inappropriate" was relied upon in a dismissal

Bandara v British Broadcasting Corporation, UKEAT/0335/15

For a dismissal to be fair, it must follow a reasonable process and the employer must rely on one of five potentially fair reasons set out in the Employment Rights Act 1996.

In this case, there was a previous final written warning on file which had been relied upon by the employer when dismissing the Claimant. The Tribunal found the previous final written warning to be manifestly inappropriate based upon the employer's own disciplinary policy. However, in this case, the Employment Tribunal, despite this finding, then went on to substitute its own view on the facts as to whether the dismissal was reasonable. Instead, it should have considered whether the employer had acted as a reasonable employer and examined why the employee had been dismissed, especially in circumstances where weight had been attributed to the historical final written warning in reaching a decision to dismiss.

The key point for employers here is where there is already a warning on file, is the employer relying on that warning in a decision to dismiss? It is always worth considering whether it would be sufficient to dismiss the employee without relying on a previous warning. Alternatively, where a historical warning is taken into account, it is worthwhile explaining why it is reasonable to take that historical warning into account in reaching a decision to dismiss.

Dress Codes in the News

We had two Attorney General opinions over the summer, in relation to employers' dress codes and which religious items (if any) an employee is able to wear to manifest their religious belief. Whilst Attorney General opinions concern matters of European domestic law, the opinions are important from a UK law perspective and can indicate the direction of travel.

The first case is Achbita and another v G4S Secure Solutions NV. This case involved a female member of staff who told her employer (G4S) that she was going to wear a hijab because of her Muslim beliefs. G4S had a strict policy that employees in Belgium could not wear any religious symbols at work. The Attorney General found this to be a case of indirect religious discrimination (rather than direct) on the basis that this was a general rule applied by the employer equally applicable to all members of staff and all religions. The Attorney General's opinion suggested that the policy, whilst indirectly discriminatory, was capable of being justified. The Attorney General said that employers had to be permitted to have a degree of discretion in how they conduct their business, which included a right to have a dress code setting down standards for workers to behave and dress in a particular way, where they are in regular contact with clients or customers. The Attorney General's view was that a ban on hijabs was consistent with the employer's aim to be religiously neutral.

However, a second opinion, in the case of Bougnaoui and another v Micropol Univers, involved a ban on religious dress which prevented a Muslim IT engineer from wearing a hijab. She was asked to remove the hijab when visiting clients and was subsequently dismissed when she refused to comply with this request. Here, the Attorney General considered the ban on religious dress to be direct discrimination, and this is a crucial difference. It is far more difficult for employers to justify a direct discrimination. Finding this was a case of direct discrimination makes it far more difficult for employers to impose religiously neutral dress codes. Here, the employer's commercial interests were not felt to outweigh the rights of the employee to manifest her religion.

The decision of the European Court of Justice is awaited in these two cases, so we will keep a close eye on any developments in this area. It is unlikely, in the UK, that the UK courts would consider it appropriate for an employer's need to allow a degree of discretion in how they conduct their businesses to be a sufficient reason to justify an indirectly discriminatory policy.

Employment Legislation Timetable 2016 And Future Developments

12 February 2016 Gender pay gap reporting: Draft regulations published on 12 February 2016. Reporting to include bonuses and extended tocover public sector employers. Employers with 250 or more 'relevant employees' in an individual entity should report on the 'relevant date', which is 30 April in each year. 'Relevant employees' will have a wide definition to include LLP members and individuals ordinarily working in the UK under a contract governed by UK legislation. There has been a delay in the finalising of the regulations and it is now expected that the final parts of the legislation will not be in force until April 2017 (compared to October 2016, as had originally been envisaged).
15 February 2016 Recruitment agencies: Consultation response published on regulation of recruitment agencies and further restrictions on overseas recruitment.
7 March 2016 Regulatory framework for individuals in financial services: The new senior managers and certification regime was implemented, which regulates individuals working in banks, building societies and some investment firms, and is intended to align risk and reward and strengthen individual accountability in the financial services sector.
16 March 2016 Budget 2016: Taxation on termination payments: From 2018, termination payments subject to income tax on amounts in excess of £30,000 will be subject to employer national insurance contributions. The £30,000 exemption will remain.
31 March 2016 Modern Slavery Act: Organisations operating in the UK with a turnover of £36m or more, with a financial year ending on or after 31 March 2016, are to complete a transparency statement in respect of that financial year.
1 April 2016 Introduction of the National Living wage: £7.20 per hour for all working people aged 25 and over. Other National Minimum Wage rates to increase on 1 October 2016.
6 April 2016 Introduction of the new flat-rate State Pension: £155.65 a week.
6 April 2016 Maximum compensatory award for unfair dismissal: raised from £78,335 to £78,962. The maximum amount of a week's pay was also raised to £479.
6 April 2016 Financial penalties for employers: may now be imposed on those who do not pay employment tribunal awards or sums due under a COT3.
12 July 2016 Immigration Act 2016: came into force which introduces changes to the rules on employing illegal migrants.
7 September 2016 Whistleblowing in financial institutions: new rules introduced by the FCA and PRA came into force. These rules will apply to UK deposit takers with assets of £250m or greater (including banks, building societies and credit unions), PRA designated investment firms and insurer's subject to the Solvency II directive. The aim of the new rules is to encourage more employees to come forward if they suspect poor practice.
October 2016 Ban on corporate directors: s87 of the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Act 2015 is due to come into force. This imposes a 'natural persons' requirement, banning corporate directors. Therefore, non legal persons, such as a company, will no longer be allowed to be a director. Directors must be human beings. There will be a transitional period of 12 months from the date of implementation to allow companies who have non natural persons as directors to be removed or replaced by a natural person.
Early 2017 Tax-free childcare scheme: A new government scheme to help working parents with the cost of childcare. For every £8 a parent pays into the scheme, the government will pay in a further £2. Parents can receive up to £2,000 per child per year, up until the age of 12. Parents of disabled children will receive £4,000 a year up until the child is 17. To qualify, each parent must be in work and each expect to earn at least £115 a week, and not have an income of over £100,000 a year.
Early 2017 Brexit: Article 50 is likely to be triggered by the end of March 2007 to commence the formal process of the UK's exit from the EU.
April 2017 Immigration Act: employers will lose National Insurance employment allowance for a period of one year if they are subject to a civil penalty for employing illegal workers. The will be an additional visa levy, known as the Immigration Skills Charge, on employer's who sponsor workers from outside the EEA and Switzerland. This is to be introduced in an attempt to reduce employers' reliance on migrant workers.
April 2017 Salary sacrifice: from April 2017, the only benefits that will continue to benefit from tax and NICs relief, if provided through a salary sacrifice arrangement, will be: enhanced employer pension contributions to registered pension schemes; childcare benefits; cycles and cyclists' safety equipment provided under the cycle to work scheme; and ultra low emission cars.
6 April 2017 Gender Pay Gap Information Regulations 2017: will come into force on 6 April 2017. First reports are expected to be published by 30 April 2018.
6 April 2017 Apprenticeship levy: due to be implemented. This will apply to all employers operating in the UK who have an annual pay bill of more than £3m. Employers' will be required to spend 0.5% of their total pay bill on the apprenticeship levy. There is a levy allowance of £15,000, so the total levy will be 0.5% of an employers' pay bill minus the allowance of £15,000. A pay bill is the total amount of the employees' earnings that are subject to Class 1 National Insurance contributions.
April 2018 Termination payments: as announced in the Autumn Budget 2016, amounts up to £30,000 are free from tax and NICs. Amounts in excess of £30,000 will be subject to tax and employer NICs.

Payments for injury to feelings will fall outside the exemption for injury payments, except where the injury amounts toa psychiatric injury or other recognised medical condition.
November 2018 Equalisation of state pension age: to age 65 for both sexes by 2018. The age will increase to age 66 by September 2020.
2018 Grandparental leave: legislation to be introduced by 2018.

Originally published December 2016

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

© Copyright 2017. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions