UK: Package Or Unit Limitation Under The Hague-Visby Rules

Last Updated: 25 April 2017
Article by Simon Culhane

In a landmark judgment handed down this week, the Commercial Court has decided what constitutes a 'unit' for the purposes of limitation under Article IV Rule 5 of the Hague Rules and the Hague-Visby Rules. The Court also gave important guidance on whether the Hague-Visby Rules can be compulsorily applicable even though the carrier issued a sea waybill rather than a bill of lading. Last but not least, the Court declined to follow what until now has been the only relevant authority on what constitutes a package or unit for containerised cargo under the Hague-Visby Rules, namely the Full Federal Court of Australia decision in El Greco v MSC, from 2004.


The Defendant agreed to carry the Claimant's cargo of deep frozen tuna, comprising 6,448 unpackaged pieces of tuna loin weighing between about 20kg and 75kg each, stuffed into 3 of the Defendant's 'super freezer' containers. One of the containers also contained 460 bags of other types of tuna meat.

The Defendant prepared a draft bill of lading covering 12 containers of cargo including the subject 3 containers.

As a result of errors in transhipment, delivery of the 3 containers was delayed and although it was initially envisaged that the bill of lading would be issued, instead, in order to avoid any further delay the parties subsequently agreed to the issue of 3 sea waybills, one for each of the 3 containers and each of which identified the Claimant as consignee. The cargo was described in the same way in each sea waybill, for example, as follows:

1 Container Said to Contain 206 PCS

The reference to the 460 bags of tuna which had appeared in the draft bill of lading, was mistakenly omitted from the cargo description in the sea waybill.

Upon delivery, the cargo in all 3 subject containers was found to have suffered damage allegedly due to reefer machinery failure. The Defendant carrier did not admit liability for the cargo damage but it was recognised that if a number of questions relating to the limitation applicable to the claim could be answered, this would likely encourage the parties to settle their dispute. In early March 2017 a hearing took place before the Commercial Court to determine agreed preliminary issues as follows:

Were the Hague-Visby Rules compulsorily applicable to the contract of carriage?

The Claimant argued that the Hague-Visby Rules applied by force of law pursuant to the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1971 ('the Act') because shipment was from Spain, a contracting state. Although no bill of lading was ever issued, the Claimant said that the contract of carriage was nevertheless 'covered by a bill of lading' for the purposes of the Act and the Hague-Visby Rules Article 1(b) because when the contract was made the parties contemplated that a bill of lading would be issued and the Claimant was entitled to demand the issue of a bill of lading (see Pyrene v Scindia [1954] 2 QB 402 as approved by the Court of Appeal in The 'Happy Ranger' [2002] 2 Lloyd's rep 357, both cases in which cargo was damaged during the loading operation and no bill of lading was issued).

The Defendant sought to distinguish the case from Pyrene because sea waybills were issued and they argued that any right to demand the issue of a bill of lading was spent once waybills were issued. The Defendant said that because a sea waybill is not a bill of lading under Article 1(b) (see The 'Rafaela S' [2005] 2AC 423), the Hague-Visby Rules could not apply compulsorily.

The judge followed Pyrene and found that so long as the terms of a contract require a bill of lading to be issued or the Claimant is entitled to demand one, it is immaterial whether a bill of lading was ever issued, or even whether a waybill was issued instead, and decided that the Hague-Visby Rules applied by force of law.

If the Hague Rules apply is the container or each individual piece of tuna the relevant package or unit for the purpose of Article IV rule 5

Given that the judge had decided that the Hague-Visby Rules applied compulsorily, the question (what is a unit under the Hague Rules?) did not apply. However, the judge chose to deal with it because in his view there is no difference in meaning of the words 'package or unit' under the Hague Rules and under the Hague-Visby Rules (see below).

The Claimant argued that the individual unwrapped and unpackaged pieces of tuna were the relevant 'units' and the 460 bags of tuna parts the relevant 'packages' for Hague Rules purposes. The Claimant relied on The 'River Gurara' [1998] 1 Lloyd's Rep 225 (CA) which held that the carrier's liability under the Hague Rules is to be calculated on the number of packages or units that are proven to have been loaded in the container, not upon the number of containers.

The Defendant argued that the pieces of tuna were not 'units' in the accepted sense of 'shipping units' (as determined by The 'Aqasia' [2016] 2 Lloyd's Rep 10 (Commercial Court, Sir Jeremy Cooke)) because they required consolidation by stuffing them into a container in contrast to the examples of 'units' in the case law such as cars, large pieces of timber, tractors and generating sets. Accordingly, the Defendant said that only the containers themselves were the relevant 'units'.

The judge decided that the Hague Rules do not require any consideration of how the cargo could have been shipped if not containerised. He suggested that the container walls should be treated as 'transparent under the gaze of Article IV rule 5' and found that the only relevant question to ask is whether the individual physical items were in any way packaged together. He found that the cargo was a mixed cargo of 'packages' and 'units' with each bag being one package and each unpackaged tuna loin being one unit, since each was identifiable as a separate article for transportation within the container.

Assuming that the Hague-Visby Rules apply, is the container or the individual piece of tuna the relevant package or unit for the purposes of Article IV Rule 5 and in particular, are the individual pieces of tuna 'packages or units enumerated in the bill of lading as packed in such [container]' for the purposes of Article IV rule 5(c)

Having decided that each piece of fish constituted a unit for the purposes of the Hague Rules and the Hague-Visby Rules, the question then is whether or not such units were 'enumerated' in the bills of lading as packed in the container as required by Article IV, rule 5(c) of the Hague-Visby Rules. Until now there has been no English case law authority on this question and the only guidance has been from the Full Federal Court of Australia's majority judgment in 'El Greco'. In that case the Australian Court held that the expression 'as packed' meant that individual items 'enumerated in the bill of lading' will only constitute the relevant 'units' under rule 5(a) if it is clear from the bill of lading description that those items have been packed into the container directly rather than packaged up separately e.g. into cartons or bundles. In 'El Greco' the bill of lading referred to a container 'said to contain 200,945 pieces' when in fact the individual items (posters) had been bundled up together into 2,000 packages. In that case, the cargo was not correctly described 'as packed'.

The judge disagreed with the finding in 'El Greco' and decided that Article IV,5(c) merely requires that the number of units in a container is correctly stated on the bill of lading. As the sea waybills correctly stated that the containers contained a number of pieces of tuna, the waybills therefore 'enumerated' the number of units for the purposes of Article IV,5(c).

Whether the Hague Rules or the Hague-Visby Rules are applicable, is limitation to be calculated by reference to the cargo in all three of the containers collectively or individually per each container?

The judge dismissed the idea that a single liability limit should apply to the number of packages or units in all three containers, akin to a single contract price. He also rejected the idea that the Defendant's liability should be subject to an aggregate limit per container, calculated by reference to the number of tuna loins in that container. Instead, having first decided that each tuna loin was a 'unit' under both the Hague Rules and the Hague-Visby Rules, the judge decided that the limitation applied to each tuna loin separately, leaving no carry over of unused balances between units.

So, if the limitation amount is £100 per package or unit and two pieces of tuna (units) in a container suffered differing amounts of damage (one £200 and one £50) the recoverable claim will be limited to £150 not £200.


For the first time in English law we now have a clear judgment confirming the following:-

  • The Hague-Visby Rules will compulsorily apply when the contract requires the issue of a bill of lading, even if a sea waybill is in fact issued
  • The definition of 'unit' in the Hague Rules and the Hague-Visby Rules is the same and the large pieces of tuna in this case were "units" for the purpose of both.
  • To qualify as a 'package or unit enumerated in the bill of lading as packed in [a container]' (Article IV, Rule 5(c) of the Hague-Visby Rules), it is sufficient that the physical items of cargo are accurately stated in the bill of lading and there is no additional requirement that the physical items must be described 'as packed'.
  • The package or unit limitation in the Hague Rules and the Hague-Visby Rules should be calculated by reference to each individual package that has suffered damage.

Package Or Unit Limitation Under The Hague-Visby Rules

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions