BDW TRADING LTD v INTEGRAL GEOTECHNIQUE (WALES) LTD (2018)

Background

A local authority intended to sell land, which had previously been used as a residential education centre for development into housing. They commissioned the Defendant to provide a geotechnical report which was then used for marketing the site. The Defendant was going to provide collateral warranties in relation to this to the ultimate purchasers, but had not agreed to assign the benefit of the report to the purchaser of the site.

The Claimant was a national housebuilder who purchased the site. During clearing of the site it was discovered to include materials containing asbestos. The report had shown that there was a lesser risk of asbestos on the site then there actually was and thus the cost of remediating was higher than estimated. The Claimant wanted to recover these additional costs from the

Court action

Defendant although there was no contractual link between them; the Defendant was not the seller, he merely produced a report for the seller. The Claimant housebuilder therefore brought a case claiming the Defendant owed it a duty of care in relation to the report which had been negligently prepared. Had they known about the asbestos they would have negotiated a lower purchase price.

The court dismissed a professional negligence claim holding that the Defendant did not owe the Claimant a duty of care in circumstances where the consultant's appointment included an exclusion of third party rights and provided for the eventual purchaser of the property (as opposed to the builder/developer) to be afforded legal recourse by way of a formal assignment of the report or appointment.

Conclusion

This case highlights the importance of letters of reliance and collateral warranties and being certain as to who can rely on reports and take legal action when these reports are found to be defective. It will be relevant to those acquiring or selling land for development and illustrates what could happen when such collateral warranties, letters of reliance or an assignment of rights are not in place providing the legal basis for a claim to be made. Put simply if a third party wishes to rely on a report by a consultant they did not instruct they must ensure appropriate contractual arrangements are made to permit this.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.