UK: Further Encouragement From The English Courts To Pursue International Disputes There

Last Updated: 19 July 2019
Article by Andrew Hearn

The recent decision of the English Supreme Court in Vedanta Resources PLC v Lungowe and others provides a further example of the willingness of the English courts to assume jurisdiction over cases which have very little connection with England.

Between 2017 and 2018, 70% of litigants in cases brought before the English Commercial Court were not domiciled in the United Kingdom.1 In many cases, there will be no dispute between the parties as to whether the English courts provide the proper forum for the resolution of the dispute. Indeed, often the parties will have entered into a pre-existing arbitration agreement which either precludes or at any rate reduces the scope for any dispute about whether the English court has jurisdiction.

Where there is a dispute, though, the trend in recent years reveals a willingness in suitable cases to extend the arm of the English courts to cases where there was little or no connection between the parties, the underlying dispute and England. A recent decision of the English Supreme Court in Vedanta Resources PLC v Lungowe and others provides a further example of that trend.

Before looking at the trend and specifically that decision, a brief reminder of what a claimant wishing to bring its action in the English court must establish in the many cases where it will need permission to serve the proceedings out of the jurisdiction of the English court.

The requirements where permission to serve the proceedings out of the jurisdiction of the English court is needed

First, a Claimant will need to establish that the claim passes through one of the recognised jurisdictional gateways. Those gateways include demonstrating that the claim is:

  • made in respect of a contract which was made within the jurisdiction of the English court; or
  • made in tort where damage was either sustained within the jurisdiction or results from an act committed within the jurisdiction; or
  • for an interim remedy in support of foreign proceedings or an arbitration.

Secondly, it will need to establish that the claim has a reasonable prospect of success.

Thirdly, it will need to establish that England is clearly or distinctly the appropriate forum for the resolution of the claim. This entails identifying in which forum the case could most suitably be tried "for the interests of all the parties and for the ends of justice." It is the way in which the court has interpreted this third requirement which provides encouragement.

The continuation of a trend

An example of the trend towards welcoming non-English parties to litigate in England was the case of Cherney v Deripaska (on which we have reported previously). The court concluded that Russia, rather than England, was the natural forum for the dispute having regard to factors such as the subject matter of the dispute and where all the relevant events were said to have occurred (which, apart from the signing of the contract on which Mr Cherney relied, took place largely in Russia). Nevertheless the court was persuaded that Mr Cherney could not be expected to litigate in Russia because of evidence that he would not be prepared to travel there and that he would be unable to obtain a fair trial there. In those circumstances, the court concluded that the case should proceed in England in the interests of all the parties and the ends of justice.

A similar outcome was reached in AK Investment CJSC v Krygyz Mobil Tel Ltd. Proceedings had been commenced in the Isle of Man by a Kyrgyz judgment to enforce a Kyrgyz judgment against three Isle of Man companies. The Isle of Man companies counterclaimed and sought and obtained permission to add 13 additional defendants to the counterclaim and serve them outside the jurisdiction. Six of them challenged that decision. The Privy Council concluded that Kyrgyzstan was the natural forum for the dispute but that the practical reality was that if the Isle of Man companies were left to proceed there, they would be unable to pursue any of their claims. They were therefore allowed to proceed in the Isle of Man because that was the only way in which substantial justice could be achieved.

Although there have been cases which have gone in the other direction, with the English court declining jurisdiction, the decision of the Supreme Court in Vedanta shows once again the willingness of the English courts to assume jurisdiction over disputes even though the natural forum for the dispute would not be England where justice requires it.

The Vedanta decision

The Vedanta case was a group tort claim for negligence and breach of statutory duty which were said to have resulted in toxic emissions from a mine in Zambia. The claimants comprised nearly 2000 Zambian citizens who claimed that their health and farming activities had been damaged by the discharge of toxic matter from the mine. The two defendants were the owner of the mine, a Zambian company, and its parent company, an English company. All of the relevant events took place in Zambia and there was little to connect the claim with England beyond the fact that the mine operator's parent company was English. Unsurprisingly the Supreme Court concluded that Zambia would plainly be the proper forum for the litigation but that conclusion was qualified by the requirement that substantial justice should be available to the parties in Zambia.

Whilst it was not in doubt that Zambia had independent courts which would ensure a fair trial of the claim, there was a practical impossibility of the claimants funding the claim: all of them were in extreme poverty and would not be able to retain lawyers as they could not neither obtain legal aid nor access to alternative funding arrangements (those being unlawful in Zambia). In addition, there was an absence in Zambia of suitable legal teams to enable litigation of the size and complexity envisaged to be pursued there, especially given that it would be proceeding against a well-resourced defendant. In those circumstances the Supreme Court agreed that the action should proceed in England, again because such was in the interests of all the parties and the ends of justice.


Decisions of the English court on whether it is or is not the appropriate forum for the resolution of a dispute will always be fact specific. What cases such as those mentioned in this update demonstrate is that where the facts drive the court to the conclusion that England is, for whatever reason, the most suitable forum in the interests of the parties and justice, it will not shirk from taking a case which has very little connection with England.


1) Commercial Court Annual Report 2017 – 2018.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions