European Union: Publication Of The EU's Banking Package In The Official Journal And Recent Developments At The Eurogroup

Last Updated: 31 July 2019
Article by Michael Huertas and Holger Schelling

June  was a busy month, both for finalizing the appointments of presidents, commissioners and key policymakers across the EU's institutions but also for setting the future course of financial regulatory reform, be it in the Banking and Capital Markets Union projects but also in more international areas, such as completing the implementation of Basel III or the deepening of the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU i.e. the Eurozone) and making the EU's Single Rulebook for financial services more single.1

Surprisingly, despite some very vocal debates about the candidates for top EU jobs and the process in appointing these, the Consilium − i.e. the EU's "other" legislative body, which represents the executive governments of the EU's Member States - managed to push ahead a number of agreements in principle on institutional reforms relevant to the Eurozone and its Banking Union that aim to support the recent legislative reforms in the EU's Banking Package. With a new European Commission President and a raft of Commissioners set to take office and restart existing momentum on a number of priorities affecting market participants, this Client Alert looks at the extent and impact of these changes. 

At these June meetings one of the items that was high on the agenda was an agreement on a term sheet describing features of the Eurozone's budgetary plans – officially "a budgetary instrument for convergence and competitiveness for the Eurozone (BICC)" − which marks a tentative first step towards more of a Eurozone budget, something that not all EU Member States are supportive of. Areas where there is more support included revisions to the treaty on the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) to introduce a common backstop for bank resolution measures as well as the use of precautionary instruments. Other areas garnering support are necessary measures to respond to the International Monetary Fund's "Article IV Consultation" with the Eurozone on economic surveillance. Propelling Christine Lagarde to the head of the ECB as a replacement for outgoing chief Mario Draghi is perhaps not one of those official recommendations, but something that surprised markets, ECB-watchers and the electorate. 

Other Banking Union relevant institutional reforms included updates on the still much resisted (particularly in Germany) European deposit insurance scheme (EDIS) as the third pillar of the Banking Union. Discussions at the EU political level were echoed in a more technical format by EU and national policymakers on June 14, when representatives of different banks and institutions met at a conference organized by the Institute of Law and Finance in Frankfurt to discuss EDIS, NPLs, sovereign debt and safe assets. Some were of the opinion that the discussions around EDIS are reminiscent of the 2015 debate, namely that arguments are put forward on why it cannot work rather than focusing on the steps to implementing it. EDIS was nonetheless seen as a way of withstanding global competition and more importantly as an essential step to creating a functioning Banking Union. 

Against the backdrop of this institutional reform and plan making, June 27 also marked the date when Regulation (EU) 2019/876 (CRR II Regulation)2, Regulation (EU) 2019/877 (SRM II Regulation)3, Directive (EU) 2019/878 (CRD V Directive)4 and Directive (EU) 2019/879 (BRRD II Directive)5 entered into force, collectively the Banking Package, making amendments to, as opposed to replacing, the respective predecessor legislative instruments. All of these changes have an impact on the EU Single Market for financial services but also more specifically for those active in the Banking Union, especially given that the European Central Bank (ECB), in its role at the head of the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM), has indicated that it has its own supervisory expectations.

Stocktake from the Eurogroup meetings and the impact for the Banking Union

The planned changes to the ESM treaty dealing with the European Monetary Fund were approved by finance ministers and then a week later by the heads of state. This has started the revision of the ESM Treaty to allow the full package to be agreed by December 2019. Only then can the SRF backstop, in the form of a revolving credit facility, be introduced. The ESM reform is not subject to disputes amongst the members; EDIS, on the other hand, presents a few more problems. 

A High-level Working Group (HLWG) was established in January and it reported on its broader vision of what the key elements of the future "steady state" Banking Union could look like. In the words of Mário Centeno, Eurogroup president and chair of the board of governors of the ESM, "[c]ountries are not yet ready to take a decision on the next steps. More work is needed on this file and we have to define the sequence of the decision-making process. This should include the development of a road map towards beginning political negotiations on a European deposit insurance system (EDIS) and we have mandated the HLWG to report back again in December 2019. The result could then feed in the next institutional cycle." 

Therefore, while one can expect no ground-breaking news on EDIS over the next months the EU Commission is likely to be supportive of continuing to deliver this institutional third pillar to that of the SSM and the Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM), which the EU's Banking Package reforms seek to improve.  

Banking Package reforms

While the making of the Banking Package and the relevant reforms began in earnest in November 2016, the publication and entry into force of the various requirements mark an important milestone for legislative policymakers' delivery of international standards agreed by the Basel Committee, the Financial Stability Board (FSB) and the G20. These standards may be further revised and streamlined by the ECB-SSM. 

The main purpose of the BRRD II Directive and SRM II Regulation is to implement in the EU the FSB's total loss absorbing capacity (TLAC) standard.6 The BRRD II Directive revises the existing MREL regime, aligning it with the TLAC standard. It also advances reforms and amends some issues that have not worked so well such as the contractual recognition of bail-in, as set out in Article 55 of the BRRD, as well as introducing new moratorium powers for resolution authorities and requirements on the contractual recognition of resolution stay powers. The concepts of "resolution entity" and "resolution group" are also introduced. Resolution entities refers to the entities to be resolved, meaning the entities to which resolution actions could be applied, while resolution groups refers to the aforementioned entities together with their subsidiaries. 

As said above, the BRRD II Directive also allows resolution authorities to suspend certain contractual obligations of institutions and entities for a maximum of two days. Further, the Directive revises Article 55, so that it now addresses instances where it is impracticable for BRRD institutions to include contractual recognition clauses in liability contracts, i.e. the requirement for banks to include in their contracts governed by the law of a third country a clause by which the creditor recognizes the bail-in power of the EU authorities. For many firms this change may be very welcome, even if further clarity is needed from the EBA, as the authority mandated to specify the conditions under which it would be impracticable to include such recognition clauses. 

The SRM II Regulation introduces amendments such as changing the minimum requirement for the own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL) requirement for banks and globally systemically important banks (G-SIBs), to measure it as a percentage of the total risk-exposure amount and of the leverage ratio exposure measure of the relevant institution. As a brief recap, the BRRD and SRM require institutions to meet MREL at all times, which has to be determined by the resolution authority, in order to secure the effectiveness of the bail-in tool and other resolution tools. The European Banking Authority (EBA) developed regulatory technical standards for MREL, which were formally adopted by the European Commission in May 2016. While there are conceptual differences between TLAC and MREL, both standards are concerned with banks holding a sufficient amount of loss-absorbing liabilities to ensure a credible resolution of failing institutions. Also, under the BRRD II Directive, the Pillar 2 requirement will be maintained for non G-SIBs, to be extended to the institution-specific add-on for G-SIBs (if Pillar 1-MREL is not sufficient to absorb losses and recapitalize the G-SIB).

The CRR II Regulation and CRD V Directive on the other hand have other areas of focus. The CRR II Regulation contains reforms to the CRR relating to international prudential standards, particularly those set by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS), following on from the Basel III standards agreed in December 2010. It should be remembered that after the G20 summit in April 2009 the European Commission developed rules to strengthen the regulations of the banking sector using Basel III as a basis, meaning the ramifications from that still run deep. 
The CRR II Regulation contains provisions implementing the FSB's TLAC standard. To elaborate on the TLAC changes, a Pillar 1 MREL requirement for G-SIIs is introduced, in compliance with the TLAC standard. This contains a risk-based ratio and a non risk-based ratio. Under the new Article 141a CRD V Directive, breaches of Pillar 1-MREL and Pillar 2-MREL may lead to a breach of the combined buffer requirement and consequently trigger restrictions on discretionary payments to the holders of regulatory capital instruments and for variable remuneration purposes. The transitional TLAC requirement of the higher of 16% of RWA or 6% of the leverage ratio exposure measure applies immediately, while the higher requirement will come into effect at the beginning of 2022. It should also be remembered that earlier in the year7 a MREL subordination policy in several steps was revealed, where a new category of large banks with a balance sheet size greater than €100 billion was created. 

The CRR II Regulation also sets out more risk-sensitive capital requirements for market risk and introduces a binding 3% leverage ratio for all institutions subject to the CRD. The leverage ratio relating to public lending by public development banks, officially guaranteed export credits and the provision of central clearing services by firms to clients is further adjusted. The leverage ratio buffer for G-SIBs is also amended. The buffer is set at 50% of a G-SIB's risk-weighted higher loss absorbency requirements and must be met with Tier 1 capital. In the event that the G-SIB does not meet its leverage ratio buffer requirement, it becomes subject to capital distribution constraints. 

There are amendments made to the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) too. Credit institutions and systemic investment banks will now be required to finance their long-term activities with stable sources of funding. The CRR II Regulation sets the NSFR at a minimum level of 100%, meaning that an institution will hold enough stable funding to meet its needs over a one-year period both under normal and stressed conditions. 

In terms of market risk, the CRR II Regulation introduces the BCBS FRTB standards as a reporting but not a binding capital requirement. These standards relate to large exposures, exposures to central counterparties, exposures to collective investment undertakings, counterparty credit risk and interest rate risk. More specifically, the CRR II Regulation amends the CRR to introduce the standard approach to counterparty credit risk (SA-CCR) and introduces a simplified version of it for certain firms where the approach would be too complex or burdensome to implement. The new regulation also introduces the use of a single method for determining the own funds requirements for exposures due to default fund contributions. With regards to large exposures, the CRR II Regulation limits the capital that can be taken into account to calculate the large exposures limit to Tier 1 capital, and introduces the lower limit of 15% for G-SIBs' exposures to other G-SIBs.

We have already provided coverage8 on the CRD V Directive's changes for financial holding companies and mixed financial holding companies and the requirements for licensing and how to prepare for these9 but, as a recap, non-EU entities/groups that either qualify as a globally systemically important bank or which have EU firms with total assets in excess of €40 billion in their group are now required to set up an intermediate parent undertaking to allow for supervision of their activities.  Entities that meet the group asset value tests on June 27, 2019, will have until December 30, 2023, to set-up an appropriate permissioned EU-domiciled intermediate parent undertaking. 

The Banking Package also refines the reporting and disclosure requirements for small banks. The CRR II Regulation and the CRD V Directive also contain reforms to the CRR and the CRD IV Directive that do not relate directly to any international prudential standards. A number of these reforms reflect the findings of the Commission's review of the impact of CRD IV on banks' financing of the EU economy and its general call for evidence on the EU regulatory framework for financial services. The CRD V Directive also makes a specific mention of the anti-money laundering and combatting terrorist financing measures that competent authorities should take. The CRR Regulation lowered the capital requirements for credit risk on exposures to SMEs of up to €1.5 million by 23.81%. The CRR 2 Regulation keeps the percentage reduction but extends it to exposures of up to €2.5 million. The rise of sustainable finance is also taken into account as the EBA is mandated to report on how individual regulators incorporate environmental, social and governance risks into the supervisory process. 

As a whole, the legislative instruments aim to allow financial institutions to address long-term funding risk and reduce excessive leverage. The proportionality of the prudential framework for institutions is enhanced, and the loss absorption and recapitalization capacity of G-SIBs is increased. 


The long-awaited regulations and directives of the Banking Package, while now finally published, will start applying in 2020 and 2021. Whether they will have the desired effects remains to be seen, however one thing is certain, this legislative effort is a significant step in harmonizing the rules and closing the gaps exposed by the global financial crisis. These changes aim to support the EU's Single Market for financial services and beyond, but also push ahead implementation of the spirit of global principles, some of which have yet to be fully finalized internationally.

As always, firms are encouraged to keep a close eye on the ECB-SSM requirements and are reminded to track their progress through the implementation of policies and procedures in order to stay in "good graces" with regulators, especially as the ECB-SSM has indicated that its supervisory priorities over the 2019-2021 multiannual supervisory work program will continue to include scrutiny of compliance with the CRR/CRD IV chapters of the EU's Single Rulebook as well as adding its own twist.

Our Eurozone Hub lawyers are assisting a number of firms in understanding how these reforms, as well as specific requirements and expectations from the Eurozone's Banking Union, may affect their compliance requirements in documentation and non-documentation workstreams. If you would like to receive further analysis on any other issues raised herein, please contact one of our Eurozone Hub key contacts on the right. 


1 For further background information readers may turn to the following contributions from the European Parliament's Economic Governance Support Unit, which provides in-depth analysis to MEPs and is useful in terms of framing issues that MEPs are considering. These contributions show the policy directions that are likely to be set by the European Commission and DG-FISMA's priorities for the 2019-2024 legislative cycle:

  1. Banking Union: what next?
  2. Banking Union: Completing the Single Rulebook?
  3. Banking Union: Defusing the home/host state debate

2 See full text here.

3 See full text here.

4 See full text here.

5 See full text here.

6 See our dedicated coverage on MREL and TLAC from January 2019 here.

7 See coverage here.

8 Available here.

9 Available here.

Dentons is the world's first polycentric global law firm. A top 20 firm on the Acritas 2015 Global Elite Brand Index, the Firm is committed to challenging the status quo in delivering consistent and uncompromising quality and value in new and inventive ways. Driven to provide clients a competitive edge, and connected to the communities where its clients want to do business, Dentons knows that understanding local cultures is crucial to successfully completing a deal, resolving a dispute or solving a business challenge. Now the world's largest law firm, Dentons' global team builds agile, tailored solutions to meet the local, national and global needs of private and public clients of any size in more than 125 locations serving 50-plus countries.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions