UK: All In It Together - New Guidelines On Witness Hot-Tubbing

Last Updated: 14 October 2019
Article by Maurice Kenton and Sapna Jhangiani

The process of allowing experts or other witnesses to give their evidence together can be difficult to manage. We explore valuable new guidelines that should help counsel - and arbitrators - with this challenging task.

Earlier this year, the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators' (CIArb) Singapore branch published new guidelines and model directions on witness conferencing. This is a very welcome development, given the lack of materials on this subject up to now.

The guidelines take the form of a checklist with copious notes, and directions that are both general and specific. The general directions are intended for use mainly at the outset of proceedings, when it is not known how much evidence should be given in this form, or indeed whether witness conferencing should be used at all. The more detailed directions are for use when the suitability of the procedure has been established and the tribunal needs to decide the extent of any witness conferencing, and how it should be managed. The directions are also annotated fully, although here the guidance is likely of more use to newcomers, perhaps, than to experienced practitioners.

This technique of taking evidence from more than one witness in a 'conference', i.e. at roughly the same time, is not new or particularly revolutionary. From one point of view it is just the culmination of a long-term trend. Traditionally, parties presented sequentially (in English courts, at least), with the claimant arguing its case and putting forward all its documentary and oral evidence first, and the defendant doing the same after the claimant had finished. In a small or technically simple case, that might work well enough, but where the hearing takes weeks or even months to complete and/or the issues addressed in the evidence are more technical, it is obviously not helpful for the judge or tribunal to hear expert witnesses, in particular, several weeks apart. The traditional approach has therefore evolved gradually into a more flexible one, where parties' evidence is interleaved, and it is quite common now, even in the courts, for experts to be cross-examined in turn, issue by issue, so that a judge can compare directly what they have to say.

Multiple forms and names

When a tribunal orders witness conferencing, the precise way in which the tribunal deals with the experts depends partly on the arbitrators' preferences, but also on the nature of the evidence and how it relates to the dispute. The simplest approach is for the tribunal to take the lead and cross-examine experts from like disciplines together, with the experts also quizzing each other when appropriate and counsel asking a few mop-up questions at the end. However, other approaches are possible too, for example experts leading the session and asking the initial questions. Helpfully, CIArb caters for each of the main options with alternative, tailored directions.

The fact that the procedure takes different forms is part of the reason why it goes by several names: witness conferencing, concurrent witness evidence, and hot-tubbing. The latter term appears to originate in Australia, where the technique is used in the courts. Other countries whose courts have adopted it to a greater or lesser extent include the UK and Singapore.

In the English courts, witness conferencing was promoted by Sir Rupert Jackson as part of his costs reforms six years ago, although the procedure has not been used as widely as he hoped, despite the English Civil Procedure Rules providing for it in suitable cases (paragraph 11 of Practice Direction 35).

In Singapore there are no rules or guidelines that encourage or discourage witness conferencing in the courts generally. It is discretionary. However, in the Singapore International Commercial Court (SICC) the court is given a nudge in this direction. Paragraph 90 of the SICC Practice Directions states that "the Court may direct that the evidence of several experts be taken concurrently", and there is an added health warning that, where this procedure is adopted: "in general, a full cross-examination or re-examination is neither necessary nor appropriate". However, the Practice Directions make clear that the manner in which concurrent expert evidence is to be taken is always at the discretion of the court.

The term 'hot-tubbing' suggests a degree of informality but also, perhaps, that the expert is in some sense exposed. Not all witnesses cope well with the procedure; a hired gun can be easily rumbled, for example. If she is a seasoned professional expert, she may cope well with cross examination, but in discussion with another expert her bias may be clear. Experts can founder for other reasons too. The dynamic between two witnesses can be unhelpful, for instance, particularly where one is more senior and the other relatively junior. Then the young expert may not want to challenge the older one, and the latter may resent his authority being questioned. This is a particular problem in certain cultural contexts, and can be acute where the junior expert has studied under the more senior one (as has been the case in some well-known examples where witness conferencing has not worked well). Unfortunately this situation is sometimes impossible to avoid when the area of expertise is narrow and one's opponent has taken steps to conflict all obvious candidates for the expert role. This problem, and others like it, are explored fully in the new guidelines.


For the most part the guidelines are helpful without being particularly controversial - a compendium of good advice and model wording for all circumstances. However, they do contain a few surprises.

To start with, one would expect the drafting team to have banged the drum for witness-conferencing, promoting it as modern and cost-effective, and therefore a generally desirable way of taking expert evidence in arbitration. However, the opposite impression is often given. This is partly the result, no doubt, of CIArb taking into account practitioners' views, canvassed during a consultation that preceded publication of the guidelines. Many lawyers (the authors included) are ambivalent about the procedure. They may have seen it work well, but they have also seen it come off the rails, for example where the experts have different degrees of fluency in the language of the arbitration so that the procedure either doesn't work or is obviously unfair, or where an expert cannot cope with the procedure and undermines his client's case at the eleventh hour. It can also add to the costs of a case, since it is an additional procedure, not a substitute for the preparatory steps that have to be taken anyway.

The next surprise is the abundance of detail in the guidelines. This is impressive, but occasionally overwhelming.

Finally, there is an optimistic sense that when problems are identified, they can generally be dealt with adequately if they are anticipated far enough in advance and suitable preparations are made. However, it is worth bearing in mind that in some cases it is simply a bad idea to have witness conferencing, or at any rate it has a significant downside that cannot be avoided. For example, the procedure does not mix easily with video conferencing, where experts who are physically present have an advantage over those that are participating remotely. On the other hand, if all experts participate by video link, it is very difficult to achieve the fluid communication that is the hallmark of witness conferencing when properly done. That said, if a tribunal is determined to press ahead with the procedure, which is often the case, there is little counsel can do except prepare as best they can - and make sure their experts are prepared too.

Advice for arbitrators

CIArb should be congratulated on producing a valuable resource for the whole arbitration community. One key point that comes across clearly in the guidelines is the need for preparation in the part of the tribunal as well as counsel. Parties are encouraged to produce a schedule of issues (points the experts cannot agree on) and an agreed chronology drafted specifically for the witness conference hearing. However, there is no substitute for the tribunal reading all the key documents in a case rather than just the pleadings and the expert reports. Another key point is that tribunals should be aware when witness conferencing is not working, and be ready to call a halt to the procedure when appropriate. The guidelines flag both of these issues clearly. In fact, the advice aimed at arbitrators is arguably the most valuable element of the guidelines. It will be interesting to see to what extent it is followed.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions