UK: Without Prejudice Gone Barmy? Oceanbulk Shipping v TMT Asia

Last Updated: 17 February 2010
Article by Andrew Howell

The point is a simple one. When can without prejudice negotiations be used in evidence for the interpretation of a settlement agreement?

Or, as Ward LJ put it in his droll dissenting judgment in Oceanbulk Shipping v TMT Asia (15 February 2010): "Why on earth can you not use negotiations to establish the truth of what the concluded contract means? Not to do so would strike my mother as "barmy"."

Oceanbulk v TMT was a case about forward freight agreements (FFAs): effectively, contracts gambling on the state of the freight market as at a particular future date. Oceanbulk and TMT had entered into a large number of FFAs, as a result of which TMT owed Oceanbulk about US$40.5m. The parties then entered into a settlement agreement to determine the payment terms.

The dispute centred on a clause in the settlement agreement which referred to "co-operating" to close out positions. The question was whether this "co-operation" referred to closing out bi-lateral positions between Oceanbulk and TMT, or referred instead to Oceanbulk's liabilities to third parties on various back-to-back or "sleeved" transactions.

TMT, in support of its construction of the agreement, wanted to put in evidence of without prejudice discussions about the "sleeving". Following the House of Lords' recent judgment in Chartbrook v Persimmon Homes (2009), evidence of negotiations can be given to assist the interpretation of a contract where it is to establish that "a fact which may be relevant as background was known to the parties". TMT said that the pre-contractual statements about sleeving were just such a fact. The question was whether this evidence was admissible even though the statements had been given in the course of without prejudice negotiations.

The short answer was no, a majority of the Court of Appeal overturning Andrew Smith J's first instance judgment. Longmore LJ (with whom Stanley Burnton LJ agreed) gave the leading judgment, citing a number of reasons:

  • First, there were various exceptions to the rule of non-admissibility of without prejudice statements (Unilever v Procter & Gamble (2000)). So, without prejudice statements can be referred to in evidence where:
    • the issue is whether settlement negotiations have resulted in a concluded deal;
    • it is argued that an agreement should be set aside for misrepresentation, fraud or undue influence; or
    • there were clear statements in negotiations on which another party acted which may give rise to an estoppel. This case did not fall within those exceptions, however.
  • Secondly, as last year's House of Lords' judgment in Ofulue v Bossert (2009) made clear, there is clear policy in ensuring that parties should be able to speak freely in settlement discussions: to "negotiate openly without having to worry that what they say may be used against them subsequently".
  • Thirdly, the effect of previous authorities was not (as TMT argued) that once a settlement agreement had been made, any prior without prejudice negotiations became open and so could be referred to in any ensuing dispute.

This was no doubt a pragmatic result on the facts of this case. It is also true to say that the whole point of the without prejudice rule is that, in order to promote settlement, some relevant material will inevitably not be made available to the court. The arguments in some ways mirror those in Chartbrook as to the extent to which a court should bind itself from looking at background material in determining the proper meaning of a contract.

Nonetheless, there was force in the points made in Ward LJ's dissenting judgment:

  • Why should there be one rule for identifying a term of the contract (here, without prejudice material is admissible) but another for interpreting the terms of the same contract (where without prejudice material is inadmissible)?
  • On a rectification case (i.e., an argument that the settlement agreement should be re-written to accord with the parties' intentions), without prejudice negotiations are admissible to prove an agreement. Why should it be any different when interpreting the settlement agreement?
  • Further, if the purpose of clothing negotiations with privilege is to facilitate a compromise, why continue to wrap those negotiations in secrecy once the settlement has been agreed, at least between the parties themselves?

Either way, the practical pointers seem clear from the Oceanbulk decision. First, the premium on clear drafting is all the more important on settlement agreements where it will be that much more difficult to bring in evidence of pre-contractual negotiations. Secondly, much like Chartbrook, if a party wishes to bring in evidence on background discussions, rectification arguments are an obvious way of doing so.

The last word, however, went to Ward LJ, in an aside about an earlier judgment of one of his fellow Court of Appeal judges:

"I prefer the instincts of the youthful Stanley Burnton J before he became corrupted by the arid atmosphere of this Court. It goes to prove what every good old-fashioned county court judge knows: the higher you go, the less the essential oxygen of common sense is available to you."

A debate on the effectiveness of our appeal system, though, is perhaps one for another day.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions