On March 27, 2013 the Supreme Court reversed a class
certification by the Third Circuit in an antitrust case, holding
that a party seeking class certification must show a class-wide way
to calculate damages. Comcast Corp. v. Behrend, 133
S.Ct. 1462 (2013).
Plaintiffs were subscribers to Comcast's cable television
services. They filed a class action antitrust suit against
Comcast, alleging that Comcast monopolized Philadelphia's cable
market by "clustering" cable systems in the region by
swapping their own systems outside the region for systems located
in the region and then charging supra-competitive prices. The
plaintiffs proposed four theories of antitrust impact. The
district court rejected all but one—namely, that Comcast
deterred competition from "overbuilders" that would have
extended service to the Philadelphia area but for Comcast's
conduct. The district court certified a class of more than 2
million subscribers. The Third Circuit affirmed, refusing to
entertain arguments against the plaintiffs' damage model before
a hearing on the merits.
The Supreme Court reversed. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
23(b)(3) requires questions of law or fact common to class members
to predominate over any questions affecting only individual
members. Because plaintiffs' expert admitted that his
damage model calculated damages arising from the anticompetitive
conduct as a whole and did not isolate damages caused solely by
exclusion of overbuilders, the Court held that the plaintiffs had
failed to show that a common question of fact—the amount of
damages—was predominant. The Court held that the Third
Circuit erred in failing to consider challenges to the damage model
that bore on the propriety of class certification simply because
those arguments would also be pertinent to the merits
determination.
The decision will make it more difficult to obtain certification
of class actions because individual issues of damages that are not
amenable to class-wide resolution will defeat class
certification.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.